<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Iowa Independent &#187; Presidential Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowaindependent.com/tag/presidential-debate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowaindependent.com</link>
	<description>Iowa politics, news, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:51:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In final debate, McCain swings past target, exposes himself</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/7107/in-final-debate-mccain-swings-past-target-exposes-himself</link>
		<comments>http://iowaindependent.com/7107/in-final-debate-mccain-swings-past-target-exposes-himself#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willam Ayers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=7107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> McCain was like the kid who jumps out from behind a bush and yells "boo" to scare you on the way to school -- after jumping out from the same bush and yelling "boo" each day for the past two weeks. As Dionne Warwick would say, you just walk on by.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a sense Sen. John McCain was a political Rocky Balboa in Wednesday night&#8217;s debate. After weathering punch after punch in the form of polls and economic indicators and the dead weight of the Bush Administration to which he is tethered with a 90 percent voting record, there is still fight in this GOP warrior.</p>
<p>But in the movie, Sly Stallone&#8217;s iconic character pulls himself from the mat while the audience is still in suspense, waiting to find out what will happen.</p>
<p>With three weeks until the election, this very real American drama is far from over, but both McCain and Sen. Barack Obama showed signs of end-game strategy, with McCain gleefully going for gusto, and Obama comfortable with allowing McCain&#8217;s old lines of attack to continue.</p>
<p>Many analysts are surely all over cable and the Net now giving McCain the debate on points. The only trouble with that is this: he lost the forest through the trees. Obama talked past McCain to the American people.  McCain seemed more interested in winning a fight with Obama.</p>
<p>The Arizona senator tossed in 1980s-style attacks on Obama that seemed tired (e.g., liberal tax-and-spender) and ridiculous comparisons, such as the one he trotted out seeking to link Obama to Herbert Hoover.</p>
<p>McCain used the debate to continue his backfiring line of attack that Obama started his campaign in the &#8220;living room&#8221; of a terrorist, William Ayers. But for two years, Obama has appeared in our living rooms, through the TV or, for some Iowans, literally.  The suggestion that he&#8217;s a stalking horse for dark forces is an eye-roller.</p>
<p>McCain was like the kid who jumps out from behind a bush and yells &#8220;boo&#8221; to scare you on the way to school &#8212; after jumping out from the same bush and yelling &#8220;boo&#8221; each day for the past two weeks. As Dionne Warwick would say, you just walk on by.</p>
<p>Swinging for Obama with haymakers, McCain made the classic mistake of the barroom brawler who, intoxicated with anger, forgets that such long reaches leave the thrower exposed. McCain&#8217;s attempts to hook Obama to certain ghosts of the Vietnam War haven&#8217;t worked because people are too busy fighting their own contempotary day-to-day battles. And we don&#8217;t care that Obama hasn&#8217;t traveled to South America, something for which McCain actually chided the Illinois senator with a snide line that just seemed mean &#8212; like something you&#8217;d hear from a 9-wood-wielding 72-year-old yelling at the 82-year-old he&#8217;s trying to play through on an Arizona golf course.</p>
<p>McCain, so fired up over Ayers, forgot to study his health care plan or develop a clear way to explain it. So on this real-world issue, one that&#8217;s scary stuff on Maple Street, the debate left the distinct impression that McCain&#8217;s plan could eliminate your employer-based coverage and replace it with a nebulous $5,000 credit &#8212; a situation that could leave older workers with a far worse deal.</p>
<p>Obama showed superior command of the details, leaving McCain with a weak retort of seeking to pin the supposed woes of &#8220;Joe the plumber&#8221; on Obama.</p>
<p>McCain made a miscalculation with his tax-and-spend attacks on Obama as well. Americans aren&#8217;t so worried about high taxes right now because the government can&#8217;t tax what they don&#8217;t have. They want some stability in their lives, someone to take charge and stop the hemorrhaging.</p>
<p>Even McCain&#8217;s best line of the night will come back to haunt him. &#8220;I&#8217;m not President Bush,&#8221; McCain said. &#8220;If you wanted to run against President Bush you should have run four years ago.&#8221;  Anytime George W. Bush&#8217;s name is mentioned it is a loser for McCain, and it is he, not Obama, in all those pictures hugging and consorting with W.</p>
<p>Here in western Iowa, we were treated to another slap in the face as McCain, with the universe of federal spending to choose from when asked a question about where he may make some cuts, went right for the throat of ethanol. Some Republicans in recent days here in Carroll have told me they don&#8217;t like McCain&#8217;s position on ethanol but they view his comments as rhetorical. The cuts couldn&#8217;t make it through Congress so his statements are irrelevant, they argue. Considering what ethanol has meant to the farm economy of this part of Iowa, that&#8217;s a gamble most aren&#8217;t willing to take.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, on the energy front, McCain is proposing the construction of 45 new nuclear plants &#8212; not exactly a boon for western Iowa which will benefit if wind, solar and other renewable forms of energy are placed at the top of the nation&#8217;s energy strategy &#8212; as they are with Obama.</p>
<p>Finally, and perhaps most devastating for McCain, was a comment he made about abortion as he literally poo-poohed the idea of a &#8220;health of the mother&#8221; exception in a theoretical late term abortion ban. No matter how this spins, it still stings McCain and will be a deal-killer with independent suburban &#8212; and even rural &#8212; women, not all of whom have picked a candidate yet.</p>
<p>In fact, McCain&#8217;s opposition to the health exception was the only major new position to emerge during the course of the debate, and it will weigh heavily on certain undecided voters&#8217; minds.  One could make the case that the other 89 minutes and 45 seconds of the debate meant nothing politically for either man.</p>
<p>McCain may find himself playing defense among female voters all the way through Election Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iowaindependent.com/7107/in-final-debate-mccain-swings-past-target-exposes-himself/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain hits pitch but Obama makes sale</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/6194/mccain-hits-pitch-but-obama-makes-sale</link>
		<comments>http://iowaindependent.com/6194/mccain-hits-pitch-but-obama-makes-sale#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=6194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>COMMENTARY:</strong> In Friday night's debate, McCain was like a Buick salesman who did a better job pitching his car than the Toyota guy. Great on points, but we know who gets the sale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can make the case that Sen. John McCain won the presidential debate Friday on foreign policy, but if it is victory, it is hollow, as McCain was in something of the position of selling yesterday.  His references to the  bombing in Lebanon and Somalia and Kosovo showed he understands the history of foreign policy, but he appeared tethered to it when the nation clearly wants a new course.</p>
<p>Sen. Barack Obama made a change of direction &#8212; getting out of Iraq more quickly than McCain and focusing on Afghanistan and other incubators of terror &#8212; sound safe in his hands.</p>
<div id="attachment_6205" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6205" title="obama-mccain-debate" src="http://iowaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/obama-mccain-debate-300x195.jpg" alt="Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama shake hands before the first debate of the 2008 general election (Photo: Flickr - David Katz/Obama for America)" width="300" height="195" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama shake hands before the first debate of the 2008 general election (Photo: Flickr - David Katz/Obama for America)</p></div>
<p>In the end, McCain was like a Buick salesman who did a better job pitching his car than the Toyota guy. Great on points, but we know who gets the sale.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obviously our foreign policy over the last eight years has not worked,&#8221; Obama said.</p>
<p>The Illinois Democrat showed a presidential command of foreign policy issues and went after his rival in a strong, respectful manner &#8212; a more Midwestern approach, if you will.</p>
<p>McCain flexed large foreign policy muscles, but he detracted from that with personal attacks on Obama, calling him naive and inexperienced. At times, the presidential debate at the University of Mississippi seemed like a contest between confidence in the form of Obama and arrogance itself with McCain.</p>
<p>It is a subtety not lost on Midwesterners.</p>
<p>Both candidates successfully articulated highly nuanced foreign policy positions, effortlessly getting the challenging names of world leaders correct (mostly), and weaving through complexities with no hiccups. No one lost the debate tonight as Obama, 47, showed the bearing for the Oval Office and McCain, 72, demonstrated sufficient vigor.</p>
<p><strong>How will it play in the Iowa?</strong></p>
<p>For those in Iowa looking for specific personal financial reasons to pick a candidate, McCain may be the only one who has provided us one &#8212; and it is not good for him in this state.  McCain made it clear one of the casualties of the potential Wall Street bailout should be ethanol.</p>
<p>Supporting ethanol might be debatable on a national level, but it is N.I.M.B.Y. around here.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d eliminate ethanol subsidies,&#8221; McCain said flatly. &#8220;I oppose ethanol subsidies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those are likely deal-killing words for farmers and others in rural America who have made investments and business decisions based on ethanol.</p>
<p>Iowa’s ethanol industry has resulted in more than 47,000 new jobs in Iowa.  Production of ethanol puts $1.7 billion into Iowa consumers’ pockets each year, according to the Iowa Corn Growers Association.</p>
<p>In neighboring Nebraska, ethanol is big business, too, and because the Cornhusker State bases three of its five electoral votes on how presidential candidates do in individual congressional districts, McCain&#8217;s ethanol blast only serves to help Obama&#8217;s already aggressive efforts in Omaha.</p>
<p><strong>Candidates on offense</strong></p>
<p>McCain had his strongest moments of the night in challenging Obama&#8217;s long-stated and controversial declaration that he&#8217;d meet with certain world leaders without preconditions.</p>
<p>Actually using the word &#8220;Holocaust,&#8221; McCain attempted to paint a picture of Obama sitting down with Hitler-like figures bent on Israel&#8217;s destruction. A mere meeting, McCain argues, confers legitimacy on thug rulers.</p>
<p>&#8220;It doesn&#8217;t mean we invite them over for tea,&#8221; Obama shot back.</p>
<p>Obama generally found success when he sought to connect McCain with George W. Bush, leaving the Arizona Republican with little but ridiculous deflectors. McCain went so far as to give himself different nicknames in the debate. First he said some people call him &#8220;sheriff&#8221; because of his alleged efforts to attack waste, fraud and abuse. I wonder what Charles Keating called McCain back in the 1980s? Sheriff &#8212; of Mayberry, maybe.</p>
<p>McCain then called himself a &#8220;maverick&#8221; as if plucking that word from his first life would save him in a second as he faced a withering assault on the links to Bush.</p>
<p>The Arizonan never adequately answered the charge that 90 percent of his political DNA comes from W.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s well known I have not been elected Miss Congenialty,&#8221; McCain repeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iowaindependent.com/6194/mccain-hits-pitch-but-obama-makes-sale/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton&#8217;s Debate Dominance Flips Script: Why Hasn&#8217;t a Woman Been President?</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/627/clintons-debate-dominance-flips-script-why-hasnt-a-woman-been-president</link>
		<comments>http://iowaindependent.com/627/clintons-debate-dominance-flips-script-why-hasnt-a-woman-been-president#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube/CNN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/627/clintons-debate-dominance-flips-script-why-hasnt-a-woman-been-president</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Commentary] Hillary Rodham Clinton&#8217;s dominating CNN/YouTube debate performance tonight flipped the script on America. Or it should have.

No longer should the question be: Can a woman be president? With her fourth in a series of crushing Democratic debate performances, the question everyone in America should be asking themselves: What have we been missing by eliminating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[Commentary] </strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton&rsquo;s dominating CNN/YouTube debate performance tonight flipped the script on America. Or it should have.
<div></div>
<div>No longer should the question be: Can a woman be president? With her fourth in a series of crushing Democratic debate performances, the question everyone in America should be asking themselves: What have we been missing by eliminating more than half our population from the&nbsp; application process for this job since the late 18th century?</div>
<p><span id="more-627"></span>
<div>Much will be made of the differences in foreign policy answers between Clinton and U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Il. When asked whether they would take on one-one-one sessions with a series of dictators,&nbsp;evil-doers, if you will, Obama noted that President Ronald Reagan spoke with Soviets at the same time he was calling their nation an &ldquo;evil empire.&rdquo; Of course, that&rsquo;s back when we were playing against nation-states &mdash; and under what amounts to Marquis of Queensberry Rules compared to today&rsquo;s foes.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Clinton answered next, saying that she wouldn&rsquo;t agree to the premise of the question, that she&rsquo;d sure not promise (to someone on YouTube) to meet with any leaders within a year. She&rsquo;d send &ldquo;high-level envoys&rdquo; and work &ldquo;back channels&rdquo; first, and not allow backwater dictators even a hint of sunlight for &ldquo;propaganda purposes.&rdquo; It was the sort of nuanced answer from someone who has been in the room, knows how to play the game. In other words, HRC&rsquo;s answer was devastatingly competent.</div>
<div></div>
<div>But her best stage work&nbsp;came in response to just the sort of question that her detractors love to use. Not even bothering to conceal his contempt for Clinton, a YouTube questioner asked her how she could deal with Muslim nations and other patriarchal places in the world that discriminate against women.</div>
<div></div>
<div>She quickly noted that she&rsquo;s been to more than 80 nations as a senator and former First Lady. Again, in the room.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&ldquo;I believe there isn&rsquo;t much doubt in anyone&rsquo;s mind that I can be taken seriously,&rdquo;&nbsp;said Clinton, who seized&nbsp;the No. 1 ranking in this debate.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Then, for good measure, she again flipped the script on the cad who asked this question. It is entirely appropriate for the United States, in fact, even preferable, to have a woman president dealing with Muslim nations and woman-subjugating locales. Brilliant.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Clinton had one of the better policy responses as well, suggesting that $50 billion in big-oil subsidies go to green energy R&amp;D.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s time we started acting like Americans again,&rdquo; Clinton said. </div>
<div></div>
<div>When asked the dynastic question, the Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton scenario, she recognized what most reasonable Americans do: One of the bulbs in the post-1988 POTUS string of lights is a burnout. In a letter: W.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&ldquo;I think it is a problem that Bush was elected in 2000,&rdquo; Clinton said. &ldquo;I actually thought someone else was elected.&quot;</div>
<div></div>
<div>Ranking the rest of the candidates is particularly challenging tonight because of two reasons: the gulf-like difference between Clinton and the pack and the wild format of the &ldquo;debate&rdquo; in which not all candidates answered each question or received equal time. That said, one can make the case for the following rankings of the debate:</div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span">2. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>Some of this has to do with expectations. He&rsquo;s been just plain awful in earlier debates. I&#39;ve seen kids look less awkward at spelling bees than Richardson in those last debates. But tonight he showed some of what those of us in Iowa have seen on the stump. On gays in the military, Richardson strongly said that men and women who are putting their lives on the line shouldn&rsquo;t get a lecture on sexual orientation. He connected with the anti-war crowd (in other words, most of the nation now) with a strong answer on Iraq &mdash; getting out in six months&nbsp;with no residual troops. &lsquo;No politics, get it done.&rdquo; The minimum wage for teachers idea &mdash; 40K &mdash; good; and the plan to verify &ldquo;paper trails&rdquo; with voting surely should resonate with Dems.</div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span">3. Senator Christopher Dodd.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>The Connecticut veteran just looked comfortable up there. All of his answers were solid, and for being in his 60s, Dodd seemed to embrace the New Age debate format and roll with it as well as anyone. Powerful answers on Katrina response. Strongest specific plan on global warming: corporate carbon tax and 50 mpg standards. Missed Opportunity: when asked what family members have served in the military, Dodd should have noted (even though a bit off the question) that his father, Thomas Dodd, prosecuted Nazis at Nuremberg. No one in the field can top that, and that connection is actually one of the most admirable things about Dodd. A man whose dad was nailing these guys at Nuremberg has to have some of the right stuff, right?</div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span">4. John Edwards</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>The former U.S. senator from North Carolina conducted himself with grace and dignity. The crowd shots to his wife were big winners. He seemed genuinely outraged by poverty and some of the health-care nightmares and concerns people talked about in videos presented during the debate.</div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span">5. Barack Obama</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>Obama is playing not to lose. He&rsquo;s like a golfer laying up on&nbsp;a par 5 going for a sure par when he&rsquo;s down. As someone said to Sergio Garcia as he approached the 18th hole in the British Open Sunday: go with the driver already, Barack. Sure, with the fund-raising success he&rsquo;s having, it&rsquo;s way, way, way too early for major risks. But mix it up a little. He started to when a You-Tuber asked an obnoxious question about whether he is black enough. Obama started in on this line about getting cabs, how well, you know &#8230; and then he went Rotary Club nice, saying he believed in the &ldquo;core decency&rdquo; of the American people and that we all really do want to get along. Who didn&rsquo;t want to see Obama take this guy&rsquo;s virtual head off in his answer? Obama&rsquo;s A. Phillip Randolph-like dignity is admirable. Still &hellip; </div>
<div>Obama&rsquo;s answer on gay marriages is the best among&nbsp; the candidates and one that will sell in America. Government can call relationships between gays a civil union, turn it into a paperwork thing for hospital visits and property rights. It&rsquo;s churches that should decide whether a union of two people deserves to be called a marriage.</div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span">6. Joseph Biden</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>The veteran U.S. senator from Delaware showed strength and courage of conviction, to be sure. But he gets the last slot of the legitimate candidates because of his dismissive attitude toward the freewheeling YouTube format. Yes, senator, I agree, some of the questions like the last one, where you were asked to look to the person to your left and say what you liked best and least, were crazy exercises, demeaning to a serious process in a most serious time. Biden clearly appeared to believe that he is above the carnival nonsense of this YouTube format. Which he is. He&rsquo;s also perhaps above the moder<br />
n-day process for running for president. He could hold his own in a Senate floor debate on slavery in the 1850s, though &mdash; back when people actually read books and carried extensive vocabularies. Can we set up a computer-generated debate between Biden and Henry Clay of the Whigs? Great defense of his vote to fund troops in Iraq: Some of the money would go to armor for vehicles that could save lives.</div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span">7. Dennis Kucinich</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>He just looked so happy with himself when Anderson Cooper was showing his campaign ads on the big screen. He&rsquo;s clearly an attention addict. The campaign would be better off if he switched to heroin and headed to the alleys of Cleveland.</div>
<div></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span">8. Mike Gravel</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>&nbsp;In past articles and debate analysis pieces I&rsquo;ve given this former U.S. senator from Alaska credit for his work in releasing the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War and in raising awareness about the ludicrous war on drugs.&nbsp;He&rsquo;s earned a place in history. But his childish finger-pointing at Obama and Clinton tonight should earn him a trip off the stage and back to a life of relative obscurity. A &ldquo;South Park&rdquo; send-up would be a nice parting gift.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iowaindependent.com/627/clintons-debate-dominance-flips-script-why-hasnt-a-woman-been-president/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
