Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Former DNC Chairman Expects Strong Finish for Clinton in Iowa

By John Deeth | 08.31.07 | 10:12 am

Former Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe, now heading up Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, said Thursday his candidate is the most electable Democrat and predicted a strong Iowa caucus finish – whenever the caucuses happen.

McAuliffe delivered a high-energy talk to two-dozen supporters — mostly students — on campus Thursday afternoon. Clinton is ahead in polls in 33 of the first 36 primary and caucus states, he said.

“The only states we’re not up in, we’re tied for the lead in North Carolina against Edwards, we are 3, 4 points behind Obama in Illinois and the same thing against Richardson in Michigan,” said McAuliffe.  “Besides that, she’s doing great.” 

Still, he doubts Iowa polls that show Clinton in the lead. “We’re probably in second place behind Edwards and moving.” McAuliffe emphasized the amount of time Edwards has spent in Iowa since his 2004 presidential and vice-presidential campaigns.“Iowa and New Hampshire will stay first, no matter how they have to move it,” McAuliffe told reporters after the speech.  “Nobody wants to go into `07.  It doesn’t impact us as much as it impacts some of the other candidates who don’t have as much resources.  They’re trying to decide, `Do I go to Florida? Do I go to Michigan?  Where do I go? And when do I go?’”

Noting that that very afternoon, the Michigan House of Representatives had joined the state’s senate in moving to Jan. 15, he added,  “they need to get some finality to this calendar.”

Looking ahead to the next cycle, McAuliffe said wider reforms in the nomination process are needed.

“Once this is done, whoever wins, hopefully it’s us, we’ve got to get the Democrats and Republicans together in a room early and work this out jointly together.  I don’t know if regional’s the answer, a lot of people recommend that.  I do know that people don’t want it to go too early.  People want broad representation in the process.  Next time around people have got to know ahead of time where those states are going to be.  The issue comes down to Iowa and New Hampshire.  And there are many people, everybody knows (Michigan Sen.) Carl Levin and he’s got every right to say what he likes.  He just doesn’t think, and he’s very vocal; he doesn’t think Iowa and New Hampshire should go first.  I believe Iowa and New Hampshire have a special place, I’m of the idea that you’ve got to do things like this (event); you’ve got to go to the living rooms.  They put you through the grinder with questions, which I think is a good process.”

Nonetheless, McAuliffe said, “We will deal with whatever calendar is given to us. We are competing everywhere.”

“It is over the evening of February 5,” McAuliffe told the audience. "There are too many delegates at stake on the same day.  Could be 60 percent.  In five months this is over.”  While he was not overconfident, McAuliffe seemed to draw a picture of inevitability as he rapidly cited 20- and 30-point Clinton leads in large states. 

With the nomination in hand, McAuliffe looked ahead to the general election and attacked the electability question that has hovered around the Clinton campaign. “Hillary today is the only candidate who wins the general election against every single Republican.  She’s the only one who beats Rudy Giuliani in New York and California," he said.  "If we’ve got to compete in two of our blue states, like California and New York, that’s trouble if we got to spend tens of millions of dollars defending what should be true blue states.  We’ve got to win Ohio.  Hillary today walks away with a double-digit lead in Ohio.  Today we win Florida against every single Republican.  We are ahead in Iowa today in the general.  We are now tied for the (general election) lead in the state of

Comments

  • Anonymous

    Terry McAuliffe is one of the reasons I’ve quit the Democratic Party not once, but twice while he was chair of the DNC. At yesterday’s event in Iowa City, McCauliffe also said that the Republicans “stole” the elections in 2000 and 2004, thus relinquishing himself from the responsibility of playing a significant role in losing the elections. Sorry folks, but there’s no excuse for losing to Bush. Those elections were Gore’s and Kerry’s to lose, not the Republicans to steal or Naders to spoil.

    The second time I quit the party was when I discovered how much money the DNC was spending in an effort to thwart Ralph Nader’s presidential bid by challenging his ballot access in key states. Consequently, a great deal of Nader’s campaign funds, not to mention time, were tied up in courts trying to gain ballot access. Instead of focusing on why people should vote for Kerry, the DNC spent efforts on why not to vote for Nader and Bush.

    The first time I quit was when I found out the DLC, no direct relationship to the DNC was throwing money at candidates running against Howard Dean, namely Kerry and Gephart. Again, how undemocratic is this. Interesting how Dean is now the chair of the DNC and his 50-state strategy of challenging candidates at all levels on the campaign trail vs. in the courtroom proved succesful.

    Now the DNC and the DLC have merged under HRC, Inc. and it’ll be interesting to see how this plays out behind the scenes during the next 6 months…

  • desmoinesdem

    Terry McAuliffe–the last person any Democrat should be listening to when it comes to strategy.

    The Clintons greatly contributed to our losing Congress in 1994, and neither they nor Terry McAuliffe had any clue of how to get us back to a majority position. The only priority was whatever was good for the Clintons personally.

    The Clintons specialize in courting large-dollar donors and the “run-the-table” strategy toward federal elections. They and McAulifee were openly contemptuous of Dean’s strategy of rebuilding the state parties and competing with the Republicans everywhere.

    If McAuliffe were still running the DNC we would be in a much worse position in Congress. Quite possibly we would still be in the minority.

    Which red states can Hillary turn blue except for, possibly, Arkansas? She puts several blue states at risk of turning red.

    But never mind what’s good for down-ticket candidates or the party as a whole. It’s all about the Clintons.

  • Anonymous

    Terry McAuliffe is one of the reasons I've quit the Democratic Party not once, but twice while he was chair of the DNC. At yesterday's event in Iowa City, McCauliffe also said that the Republicans “stole” the elections in 2000 and 2004, thus relinquishing himself from the responsibility of playing a significant role in losing the elections. Sorry folks, but there's no excuse for losing to Bush. Those elections were Gore's and Kerry's to lose, not the Republicans to steal or Naders to spoil.

    The second time I quit the party was when I discovered how much money the DNC was spending in an effort to thwart Ralph Nader's presidential bid by challenging his ballot access in key states. Consequently, a great deal of Nader's campaign funds, not to mention time, were tied up in courts trying to gain ballot access. Instead of focusing on why people should vote for Kerry, the DNC spent efforts on why not to vote for Nader and Bush.

    The first time I quit was when I found out the DLC, no direct relationship to the DNC was throwing money at candidates running against Howard Dean, namely Kerry and Gephart. Again, how undemocratic is this. Interesting how Dean is now the chair of the DNC and his 50-state strategy of challenging candidates at all levels on the campaign trail vs. in the courtroom proved succesful.

    Now the DNC and the DLC have merged under HRC, Inc. and it'll be interesting to see how this plays out behind the scenes during the next 6 months…

  • desmoinesdem

    Terry McAuliffe–the last person any Democrat should be listening to when it comes to strategy.

    The Clintons greatly contributed to our losing Congress in 1994, and neither they nor Terry McAuliffe had any clue of how to get us back to a majority position. The only priority was whatever was good for the Clintons personally.

    The Clintons specialize in courting large-dollar donors and the “run-the-table” strategy toward federal elections. They and McAulifee were openly contemptuous of Dean's strategy of rebuilding the state parties and competing with the Republicans everywhere.

    If McAuliffe were still running the DNC we would be in a much worse position in Congress. Quite possibly we would still be in the minority.

    Which red states can Hillary turn blue except for, possibly, Arkansas? She puts several blue states at risk of turning red.

    But never mind what's good for down-ticket candidates or the party as a whole. It's all about the Clintons.

Switch to our mobile site