Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Huckabee on Farm Policy: Subsidies ‘Not About Farmers’ but Cost of What’s in Your Grocery Cart

By Dien Judge | 08.13.07 | 10:37 am

Mike Huckabee is just as comfortable chatting about agriculture as he is about the Fair Tax.

As the former governor of Arkansas was busy campaigning in Des Moines Friday in the closing hours before the Ames Straw Poll, he stopped for a few moments to talk farm policy with Iowa Independent.


The Republican candidate has a keen interest in the issues involved with agriculture and the 2007 Farm Bill, and he provided a fresh and different perspective on farm subsidies than other candidates in the race.

"A lot of people in urban areas don't understand," said Huckabee. "The farm subsidies are not about the farmers. They're about the consumers. It's about making sure the farm prices are stable enough and substantial enough, so that the cost of what comes to our table remains what it is."

The average family in America only spends 9 or 10 percent of its annual budget to purchase food, he said, and if it were to become more than that, it would bring drastic harm to the economy. To put it simply, that's money we wouldn't have to spend for other products and services.

"What it would mean is we would be just driving our whole economy down and changing the base of the economy," he said.

Huckabee said the stability in the farm markets provided by farm programs help to "give us the level of freedom and health that we enjoy in this nation."
He told Iowa Independent and echoed in his speech at the Ames Straw Poll that he is concerned about maintaining that stability in an increasingly globalized food marketplace.

"What worries me is that we are moving rapidly toward this concept of letting foreign importers bring more and more food in. I have a problem with the safety and quality of that food. And I also have a problem with the possibility that that food isn't produced in the same kind of standards that ours is, and that it begins to change our marketplace. I've said to many people, if you think that we have a problem with foreign oil, wait till we depend upon foreign food. That should never happen in this country. We've got to feed ourselves and fuel ourselves and fight for ourselves to be free."

One issue that has been a hot topic in Congress in the midst of writing the 2007 Farm Bill is mandatory country-of-origin labeling for food products.
Asked if he supports full implementation of the country-of-origin law, he answered quickly, "I do."

Mandatory country-of-origin labeling for retail food products was passed by Congress in 2002 but was never implemented. A provision to implement the law was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on July 27, but special interest groups are continuing to work toward weakening the law.

"I want to know where this food comes from," said Huckabee. "I have a lot more confidence in catfish farmers in Arkansas than I do in the Vietnamese who are selling me something that they're saying is catfish when it isn't. I have more confidence in our rice farmers in Arkansas and in your corn farmers than I do in somebody who is producing food in a foreign country. I don't know what kind of conditions, I don't know what issues they're dealing with, with pesticides and herbicides. I have no idea, and, frankly, their government probably doesn't either and probably doesn't care as long as they're shipping it out."

Huckabee said he was pleased with most of what he's seen going into the 2007 farm bill so far, particularly in the areas of health and nutrition.
"I like the fact that we're putting some more money into fruits and vegetables. That's something I think we need to do, to encourage consumption of fruits and vegetables, particularly among kids."

Comments

  • Jerry

    Talking points Dien uses the Republican talking term “Fair Tax” instead of the more descriptive, neutral term that calls it what it is:  sales tax.

    That’s not very independent of you.

  • desmoinesdem

    if Huckabee wants to fight the obesity epidemic Then he should oppose the subsidies that have led to thousands of processed foods containing high-fructose corn syrup.

    This sweetener is implicated in a lot of health problems, but current farm policy strongly pushes food manufacturers to use it.

  • Anonymous

    Amen to that last point Dien

  • Jerry

    Talking points Dien uses the Republican talking term “Fair Tax” instead of the more descriptive, neutral term that calls it what it is:  sales tax.

    That's not very independent of you.

  • Anonymous

    Nope Sorry, but I have to disagree.

    “National sales tax” wouldn't cut it in this reference. It's not descriptive enough.

    Huckabee has received a big push by a special interest group called FairTax.org. It is their specific tax plan that he always talks about, and it is their organization that has been credited with giving him the boost he needed to place second in the Ames Straw Poll.

    My use of the term was as much a reference to their organization as it was to their proposal.

  • desmoinesdem

    if Huckabee wants to fight the obesity epidemic Then he should oppose the subsidies that have led to thousands of processed foods containing high-fructose corn syrup.

    This sweetener is implicated in a lot of health problems, but current farm policy strongly pushes food manufacturers to use it.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, but Subsidies may lead to consumption of more processed foods, but only indirectly. The fact is, the United States can't produce enough sugar to satisfy the people's sweet tooth.

    As I see it, we basically have three choices: deny Americans their soda and chocolate and sweets (seriously doubt if that would work out too well); import more sugar from foreign nations (I don't like that idea at all); or find alternative sweeteners like corn syrup.

    Changing the nation's diet is not going to be easy, but it can be done. But let's not start blaming farmers for growing what is in demand.

  • Anonymous

    Amen to that last point Dien

  • Ad1

    2 choices “three choices: deny Americans their soda and chocolate and sweets (seriously doubt if that would work out too well)”

    you're right, it would not work out so well-

    in fact is it even fair to call this a “choice”?

    What if the choice was: people must pay fair market price for sugar and imported sweets?

    No one's blaming farmers for “growing what is in demand” …

    We're blaming the effect that crop subsidies have on the so-called “free-market”

  • Anonymous

    Fair enough Why don't you go ahead and get started working on getting all of the other nations of the world to eliminate their ag subsidies so we can eliminate ours. See you in Doha?

  • Anonymous

    Nope Sorry, but I have to disagree.
    “National sales tax” wouldn’t cut it in this reference. It’s not descriptive enough.

    Huckabee has received a big push by a special interest group called FairTax.org. It is their specific tax plan that he always talks about, and it is their organization that has been credited with giving him the boost he needed to place second in the Ames Straw Poll.

    My use of the term was as much a reference to their organization as it was to their proposal.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, but Subsidies may lead to consumption of more processed foods, but only indirectly. The fact is, the United States can’t produce enough sugar to satisfy the people’s sweet tooth.

    As I see it, we basically have three choices: deny Americans their soda and chocolate and sweets (seriously doubt if that would work out too well); import more sugar from foreign nations (I don’t like that idea at all); or find alternative sweeteners like corn syrup.

    Changing the nation’s diet is not going to be easy, but it can be done. But let’s not start blaming farmers for growing what is in demand.

  • Ad1

    2 choices “three choices: deny Americans their soda and chocolate and sweets (seriously doubt if that would work out too well)”

    you’re right, it would not work out so well-
    in fact is it even fair to call this a “choice”?

    What if the choice was: people must pay fair market price for sugar and imported sweets?

    No one’s blaming farmers for “growing what is in demand” …

    We’re blaming the effect that crop subsidies have on the so-called “free-market”

  • Anonymous

    Fair enough Why don’t you go ahead and get started working on getting all of the other nations of the world to eliminate their ag subsidies so we can eliminate ours. See you in Doha?

Switch to our mobile site