Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Romney Jokes About Cheating in Poll

By Garance Franke-Ruta | 08.11.07 | 1:13 pm

Last night, at the pre-Straw Poll “Ronstock” concert at the Bali Satay House in Ames, a Ron Paul volunteer played back a recording of competing Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney joking about cheating in a State Fair popularity contest, stuffing the ballot box in Ames, and dodging questions across the state.

Dudley Brown, executive director of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, a group that has been shadowing Romney across the state, introduced me to Jeffrey Goines – which also happens to be the name of a character in the movie Twelve Monkeys — who had been entertaining a group of gun enthusiasts with a recording he says he made at the Mitt Romney pre-Straw Poll rally, also held that evening in Ames. Goines said he attended the event to pass out Paul fliers and was not an official tracker for the Paul campaign.

“Gosh, those Ask Mitt Anythings, how many of those did we have? 46? 47? Unfortunately, people took us for our word,” Romney joked, according to a sound clip on the digital recording device. “They asked me anything. There were some truly awful questions. But I, but I tried to dodge most of those. And I, I’ll keep on doing that as long as I can.”

Dudley, who described himself as “a different kind of gun nut” and carried an iPhone, was appalled by the joke, which he says was inappropriate given the administration’s obsession with secrecy. “This is America!” Dudley said. “The real story is him saying they’re dodging questions.”

Romney also joked about stuffing the ballot box at today’s Straw Poll. “At 7 o’clock they will count the ballots. We will stuff the ballot box, I hope,” he said on the recording.

And he joked about cheating in the Corn Poll, the bipartisan State Fair popularity contest in which attendees are asked to “cast your kernel” by placing a kernel of corn in a jar for their favored candidate to show their support. “I was a little dismayed because I saw Barack Obama — he had a lot of corn in that Mason jar,” quipped Romney. “But I was number one – so thanks for cheating!” The crowd applauded in the background.

Comments

  • Maezeppa

    Mitt's a lock I've been predicting for over a year that Mitt's the one who will be nominated.  All the Bush machine is quietly behind him.

  • peterson553

    Romney = Bush = Mitt Romney is just like George Bush.  I guess if you like a corrupt, rich resident in the White House, happy voting  actually, voting doesn't really matter, after all, it's the people (or technology) who count the vote that decide who is the president, not the people who vote. Guess who said that?

    Our country is looking more and more like Stalin's government with the surveillance and big, impending government.

    Why was surveillance and Communism so bad when it was Russian doing it but it's OK when Bush & Co and all their cronies do it?

  • EchoLaughter

    Push It Real Good So long as most people remain silent, the media mafia can continue to try getting away with their idea that Ron Paul doesn't exist. And once again they can say that the people are in control when all along the powers that be, they really made the choice for the next scheduled president years ahead of time.  It's the media and it's misplaced news shows that no longer matter. And they are having a really difficult time dealing with that.

  • looloo

    wondering the same thing I have wondered the very same thing- when I was a kid the newsmen would talk about the news in Russia, contrasting our open system with their control of their citizens. They would even say how the official news mouthpiece ,Tass, had spun the news to always support what the goverment said. No tolerance for dissent of any kind.  The implication was that we were better than that.  We now have a republican party that seems offended by the very notion of more than one party. The biggest scoundrels openly flaunt the law and completely twist the news. Where else could an ex-drug addict like Rush Limbaugh possibly be taken seriously when criticizing others and supporting every lame idea to come out of this white house? It is like some episode of The Twilight Zone.

  • Kyle

    Some joke Reminds me of GWB joking about no wmds while our boys are dying.

  • Ike Hall

    I respectfully disagree “Afghanistan” did not attack us. A few jihadists temporarily sheltered in Afghanistan did, and most of the folks on those planes were Saudi. However, this was a convenient excuse to roll in and change that inconvenient regime.

  • M

    PROTEST MEDIA STATIONS! GO RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Ad1

    “when I was a kid”- How come it's always the Russians who are manipulating the media? Here is filmmaker and journalist John Pilger on Russians who are amazed at OUR media control system:

    “One of my favorite stories about the Cold War concerns a group of Russian journalists who were touring the United States.

    On the final day of their visit, they were asked by the host for their impressions.

    “I have to tell you,” said the spokesman, “that we were astonished to find after reading all the newspapers and watching TV day after day that all the opinions on all the vital issues are the same. To get that result in our country we send journalists to the gulag. We even tear out their fingernails. Here you don't have to do any of that. What is the secret?”

    What is the secret? It is a question seldom asked in newsrooms, in media colleges, in journalism journals, and yet the answer to that question is critical to the lives of millions of people.”

    In the same talk, John Pilger also reminds us of:

    “Edward Bernays, the so-called father of public relations, wrote about an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. He was referring to journalism, the media. That was almost 80 years ago, not long after corporate journalism was invented.”

    read the whole speech at

    http://www.democracy…

  • Gary Conner

    Kernal of truth Well, comedy is only possible if there is a little truth involved with the story.

    Reckon there is a “kernel” of truth in the theory that he was thanking folks for “cheating?”

    After all, he said it.

    Cheating isn't really a funny matter when it comes to our Constitution.

  • themike

    Romney is back! did any of you guys know its was Mitt Romneys Daddy who ran against
      Barry Goldwater and beat him,

    bet you didnt know that

    there back!

  • mikal214

    i agree….but. the plans did originate from there and even though the world abhorred our behavior in iraq, it supported our action in afghanastan.  we shouldn't have stopped until we got bin laden, even if we had to go to pakistan to get him.  and we certainly have no business in iraq which we've turned into a al queda factory.

    we will not recover from bush's folly for some time.

    how any republican running for president can defend such stupid foreign policy will be interesting to watch. 

     

  • SteveSavage

    Of course Romney can Buy the nomination! This is the GOP we're talking about here.  The RNC isn't there to nominate the people's choice, its just a tool of the powerful elite to decide who we get to vote for in 2008.

  • Bob

    Romney the Frat Boy Very Interesting Comments,Hasn't everyone by now been swindled enough?Aren't you sick enough yet of all of it.
      This obviousy is not the person,this Country needs.Sorry.

    But if you people out there in Iowa Don't wake up and smell the Larceny.And say something about how your Straw poll operated.And the Voting Machines used in this ganglang operation

  • shadowrox

    Put it on youtube If this is true and you in fact have a recording, it must be made available to the public ASAP! It will spread like wildfire and the MSM won't be able to do a damn thing about it. No more stolen elections. We CANNOT afford to have another corrupt neo-con slip into office!

  • strbrite

    Mitt's a Twit I think it was in really poor taste when Romney commented about how he supports his sons who haven't served their country and how his one son is “serving his country” by supporting him for president.  Bet that made all the parents feel really warm and fuzzy who have lost kids in the war.

    Ron Paul 2008!!!

  • Barrister

    The pragmatists vs. the ideal

    Ben, your comment:

    “Romney looks like the best chances for both the nomination and general election from where I sit,” sums up for me one side of the race for the R nomination.  It seems to me, as an observer over my 45 years, that the biggest impediment to nominating a *real* conservative is the propensity of the R base to nominate the candidate they perceive is the best odds to win in the general election and not for who best represents their views.  The problem with this thinking is, that you get nothing for picking the winner (and the media influences the thinking).  Winning with a pragmatist politician, who looks good and will say whatever is necessary to win, is that you end up with much the same result as a Democrat.  Whether he's got an R or a D by his name does not really matter, if he's a pragmatic politician who is just trying to stay on top. 

    As I see it, on the R side in this election cycle, it's a fight between the idealists who want to put up a *real* conservative versus the pragmatists who just want to win.  I say:  quit thinking about the end game and start voting for your principles, if you ever want those principles to find expression in the political realm.

    Its the election of RINO's (republican in name only) that has, and is, killing our party and its majority power position.  Too many vote for the guy who looks and talks conservative, like Romney, but who does not walk the walk.  Like George Bush.  The news media has tried its best to portray him as a right winger, but the reality is, he's been anything but.  His growth of government during his 8 years makes that plain. 

    All this aside, I take issue with pragmatists than any pro-war R candidate can atually win in 2008.  Think it through.  Why did R's lose the Congress last election (by slim margins across all races)?  Where's public sentiment likely to be a year from now, with the occupation in it's sixth year?  Truly, our best hope to really win, is with an anti-war candidate.  And fortunately, we have one.  A *real* one, with proven credentials consisting of many years of public speeches and interviews.  His name is Ron Paul. Check him out thoroughly, because in his case, you actually can.  And you will know him, because he does not change.  He's unlike any “politician” most have ever known, because he's more of a statesman; he cares about principle, not just winning.

    Paul Velte

    Attorney at Law

    Austin, TX

  • strbrite

    Serving their county….HA Romney and his boys all served the LDS church (going on missions) instead of serving their country.  This guy is BAD news.  He has already lied to the people when asked about his religion.  Ask Mitt Anything…except that.  He will lie every time.  Haven't we had enough lies?  Do we really want another possible 8 years of lies?

    Why does he have to lie about his religion?  Because it's a cult, a false religion.  Not the same god or jesus of the Bible.  He not only wants to be president, he is looking forward to being a god of his own planet some day.

    I'm so happy that I don't have to lie about my faith.

  • strbrite

    Right on!!!! Yes, indeedy, RON PAUL 2008!!!!

  • srbrite

    Ron Paul… Why not register as a Republican and support Ron Paul?  You stated that you felt we should get behind candidates such as Paul.

    I can find nothing good in any of the other candidates.  Ron Paul wants to get back to the constitution, which Bush has left in tatters.  Smaller government, get rid of the illegal IRS.

    Let's upset the old apple cart and get Ron Paul in office.  It upsets me greatly that Ron Paul wins ALL of the internet polls by huge margins but barely registers with the main stream media.  And then we have the likes of ABC who changes the results.

    I think they are actually afraid of Ron Paul.  This is the first time in years that I have felt like I have a candidate I can get behind rather than the lesser of two evils.

    I have been handing out Ron Paul Liberty Cards (google it) everywhere I go.  I even leave them laying around for others to find.

  • Ben

    A Man Can Be Both Hey Paul.  I practice law in California, but I went to high school in Austin, Texas, so we have that in common.  I love the city and all the concerts I was able to see there as a teenager.  My father was Air Force, so I spent my childhood moving around.

    I agree with your point that too many nationally are favoring someone who they think will win (specifically Rudy) versus the people who really match their values (shrink government, really reduce the abhorrent killing of babies, give states back their choice in creating laws, protect the constituion, solve the financial problems and the debt issues and save our country from broken entitlement programs, etc.)

    But you have Romney wrong if you think he isn't the one who stands for all of those things.  And unlike Ron Paul, he has proven time and again that he can actually get it done on a massive scale!

    What an incredible opportunity with Mitt Romney to have someone who the social conservatives, fiscal conservatives, libertarians, fair tax advocates, and those who distrust the size of government and assumption that government can run your life better than you can can ALL get behind and support.  We have a rare opportunity in what appears to be a man who can do three critical things simultaneously: (1) actually win the nomination and general election by energizing the base in a way Rudy cannot, (2) actually match my ideals almost exactly, in the way Reagan did, and (3) actually succeed at implementing and leading in exactly the way he has outlined, with proven competence turning around distressed, scandal rocked security nightmares like the olympic games right after 9/11 or the bluest of the blue states, not to mention time and again in private business, turning record losses into record surpluses and restoring faith, respect, and trust in the organizations again at the same time.

    Ron Paul may have #2 for a lot of us, but he is missing #1 and perhaps more importantly, #3.  Fortunately, in this situation, one can have it ALL, in the form of Mitt Romney.

    Give Romney some more thought, Paul.  You seem like a bright guy who won't be mislead by mischaracterizations.

  • James

    Romney a family man? I'm guessing the main reason Romney is such a “family man” is because it's a mormon belief that you get a higher place in heaven if you have a big, nice, creepy family.  Which of course is something the Bible talks a lot about.  Common people, Romney is a neo con puppet, ready to do the bidding of a bunch of fascist dictators.  His cult thing may or may not be a distraction, I have no clue.  As for the right person to vote for, I'm sure that Ron Paul is your guy.

  • Ben

    I don’t know about that implication Isn’t Mitt a Mormon?  I think people recognize he doesn’t condone cheating.  Out of all the marriages in America where no one has ever cheated, I’m willing to bet 95% were Mormon couples, based on the ones I’ve known . . .

    It seems like he is the target of all the other candidates (as the frontrunner usually is, I suppose), but he speaks ill of none (except the occassional insightful jab at Obama).  He even avoids criticizing Bush, who is the easiest target in the world!

    I think he is the best of the bunch, and certainly the only one with proven leadership, turnaround of massive organizations, reducing waste, fighting for principles in hostile territory, and all on the scale that would make him really the only candidates who is even QUALIFIED, let alone the clearly best choice for the nomination and the presidency.  It is no surprise to anyone that he is doing so well today.

  • Ben

    Why do they need to enlist, exactly? I’m not sure how I ended up being the one defending the guy, but the criticisms of him all seem totally irrational in the face of his dominance in every debate and remarkable credentials.  Mitt Romney is the most qualified candidate in my entire lifetime, that’s for sure.

    Don’t we have a volunteer military?  Hasn’t Romney (and others) fought for the military to stay that way?  Those who want to serve and want the benefits join the military.  It is a great career for some and a fantastic, easy income in the reserves for others.  And they are doing some of the most noble work possible.  Sure the thinking might be different in times of serious conflict when those who favor terror and evil and try to destroy the good and the principles of freedom are out there waging a bloody conflict, but if you sign up to serve, you go when the stability of the world and threats to the rule of law and peace globally require action abroad.  You go for a whole host of reasons: to keep America safe, to make the world a better place, and because you AGREED to serve and took all the benefits of the military during the times of peace.

    How can you fault a few boys with families of their own for not signing up even if they feel that work is also noble, when there are so many other noble causes and the military is VOLUNTARY?

  • BobBruman

    Gay Grandpa He won’t send his sons or daughters or grandson or daughters, but he will send ours. No doubt and no care are true Republican once again. Just what this fricken’ country needs more elites sending our sons and daughters to die.

  • misterbone

    Huh? You can tell alot about a person by their sense of humor, especially by what they poke their jokes at.  Think about it.

  • peterson553

    Romney = Bush = Mitt Romney is just like George Bush.  I guess if you like a corrupt, rich resident in the White House, happy voting  actually, voting doesn’t really matter, after all, it’s the people (or technology) who count the vote that decide who is the president, not the people who vote. Guess who said that?

    Our country is looking more and more like Stalin’s government with the surveillance and big, impending government.

    Why was surveillance and Communism so bad when it was Russian doing it but it’s OK when Bush & Co and all their cronies do it?

  • Ben

    Yes, do think about it . . . I agree that a sense of humor is very revealing, but it seems like Mitt is poking fun at himself.  I admire the way he doesnt’ take himself too seriously and can joke that it took a few cheating on his behalf to win a casual corn kernal poll (whether or not anyone actually tossed in an extra kernal!)

    Don’t you like his humility?

  • Gary Conner

    Kernal of truth Well, comedy is only possible if there is a little truth involved with the story.

    Reckon there is a “kernel” of truth in the theory that he was thanking folks for “cheating?”

    After all, he said it.

    Cheating isn’t really a funny matter when it comes to our Constitution.

  • Ben

    What do you mean by shill? I’m a lawyer in Southern California and interested in politics.  I will almost certainly vote Republican, and Romney looks like the best chances for both the nomination and general election from where I sit.  Does that make me a shill?  I’m certainly not paid, but I suppose I do have something of a personal interest: I would like to see the Republicans win the Election, fix the mess that Bush made, and not do it at the expense of my children through more debt and broken entitlement programs or reverse the bits of good that Bush did here and there fighting for the rights of infants (pro-life) and the sanctity of marriage.  Romney looks to me like the only one who can get that done, and I do like what the guy stands for, so feel free to call me an unpaid shill who wants to see the best candidate win.

  • jesrf

    It’s easy…. It’s easy not to cheat when you can have two wives………

  • looloo

    mitt’s sons   The point about Mitt’s sons is that the Republicans have harped and hyped this war in the direst possible terms. The perception is that the Republicans get all misty-eyed about patriotic chores for other people’s kids .Matching actions and words used to be a well understood symbol of integrity.  Making a war attractive and inevitable with your words is a damnable thing if it costs you nothing.
    Mr. Mitt is not a better man for not speaking ill of Bush- he has the comfort of knowing that his words will not put his family in danger. Someone else’s kids will pay the price for every bad decision, every lack of courage from our politicians.  Of course the sons can choose not to serve. It is just that it seems to be a pattern that the biggest boosters of war have so little personal time to give to it.
      Take a look at the You Tube video that Max Blumenthal did at the Young Republicans convention. The same young men who acted like Mr. Macho about the war whined about their asthma and bad knees when asked if they intended to enlist.

  • Tom

    ???? What good bits did Bush do???? Abortion is still legal, welfare is still out of this world, and we’re off on some “nation building” mission s around the world….. Not to mention Gas was $1.45 when he ran in 2000, now its $3.00!!!

    I’m as Republican as they come, I voted for Pat Buchannan back in the day, Reagan (twice) Bush I, Dole and Bush II twice. I won’t be fooled again. I’m going with Ron Paul, if you’re really a Republican Bill, you would too…..

  • looloo

    new concept Your children will certainly pay for the damage done to our Constitution by the lying of this administration.  I am personally ready for men to take a break from women’s issues and the sanctity of marriage- take a couple of decades off will you? Work on yourselves for a change! Maybe everyone’s children will be better off if you do!

  • mikal214

    bush v. romney and why should we think that your new pick for president will be any better than your last pick for president? 

    i’m sure you were singing bush’s praises in ’00 and ’04… you were wrong then so why aren’t you wrong now? 

  • Rucka

    Mitt was a nightmare Having actually survived the Mitt years here in MA, I can tell you he is all flash and no substance. He weasel-worded his way through his supposed stance(s) on abortion (pro-choice 1994, pro-life 1998, pro-choice 2002, pro-life to the extreme in 2004 due to a chat about stem-cells. He actually claimed he would be better for the gays in 1994 than Teddy K, then jumped way to the right and demonized them in 2002. Instead of calming the populace to not over-react and that all would be investigated and fixed when an accident occured in the Big Dig tunnel, Mitt used the death as a political device for his own gain. The result is that a family who initially planned to settle, is now suing for billions. He realized in 2002 that an educated tree stump could beat him for re-election and disappeared from the state. He did return to take credit for a ground-breaking health care plan, showily signing a bill crafted by the democratic state legisalature as if he did any real work on the subject.

    He decimated the MA GOP (that had held the Governorship for almost 2 decades). They are now almost a fringe party here. As head of the Republican Governors Association they lost many, if not most, of the GOP Executive Branch under contention in the last election.

    If Multiple Choice Willard Mitt Romney is your guy, I feel sad for you. We got duped in 2002. Don’t make the same mistake we did, Ben. Then again maybe you should. With Mitt as your guy in 2008, he finish the job 43 is doing and completely the GOP once and forever. 

  • Tom

    Sorry Should have said “Ben”.

  • Barrister

    The pragmatists vs. the ideal
    Ben, your comment:

    “Romney looks like the best chances for both the nomination and general election from where I sit,” sums up for me one side of the race for the R nomination.  It seems to me, as an observer over my 45 years, that the biggest impediment to nominating a *real* conservative is the propensity of the R base to nominate the candidate they perceive is the best odds to win in the general election and not for who best represents their views.  The problem with this thinking is, that you get nothing for picking the winner (and the media influences the thinking).  Winning with a pragmatist politician, who looks good and will say whatever is necessary to win, is that you end up with much the same result as a Democrat.  Whether he’s got an R or a D by his name does not really matter, if he’s a pragmatic politician who is just trying to stay on top. 

    As I see it, on the R side in this election cycle, it’s a fight between the idealists who want to put up a *real* conservative versus the pragmatists who just want to win.  I say:  quit thinking about the end game and start voting for your principles, if you ever want those principles to find expression in the political realm.

    Its the election of RINO’s (republican in name only) that has, and is, killing our party and its majority power position.  Too many vote for the guy who looks and talks conservative, like Romney, but who does not walk the walk.  Like George Bush.  The news media has tried its best to portray him as a right winger, but the reality is, he’s been anything but.  His growth of government during his 8 years makes that plain. 

    All this aside, I take issue with pragmatists than any pro-war R candidate can atually win in 2008.  Think it through.  Why did R’s lose the Congress last election (by slim margins across all races)?  Where’s public sentiment likely to be a year from now, with the occupation in it’s sixth year?  Truly, our best hope to really win, is with an anti-war candidate.  And fortunately, we have one.  A *real* one, with proven credentials consisting of many years of public speeches and interviews.  His name is Ron Paul. Check him out thoroughly, because in his case, you actually can.  And you will know him, because he does not change.  He’s unlike any “politician” most have ever known, because he’s more of a statesman; he cares about principle, not just winning.

    Paul Velte
    Attorney at Law
    Austin, TX

  • mikal214

    humility i especially like the humility mitt showed the other day he quipped that all his sons had declined military service but “one of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I’d be a great president.” 

    is this guy for real? 

  • mikal214

    romney fights to keep military volunteer. of course romney and others have fought to keep the military volunteer.  they don’t want to send their own kids off to the mess they’ve made in iraq.  if we had a draft we wouldn’t even be in iraq.  one thinks a little more carefully about starting a war when one’s own children might actually be hurt. 

    and no….afghanastan and iraq are two entirely different situations.  one attacked us, one did not. 

    i would hope that the agreement between the enlisted and the military would also include our leaders not starting a “pre-emptive” war with no clear objectives or exit strategy.  there are obligations on both sides. 

  • strbrite

    Serving their county….HA Romney and his boys all served the LDS church (going on missions) instead of serving their country.  This guy is BAD news.  He has already lied to the people when asked about his religion.  Ask Mitt Anything…except that.  He will lie every time.  Haven’t we had enough lies?  Do we really want another possible 8 years of lies?

    Why does he have to lie about his religion?  Because it’s a cult, a false religion.  Not the same god or jesus of the Bible.  He not only wants to be president, he is looking forward to being a god of his own planet some day.

    I’m so happy that I don’t have to lie about my faith.

  • mikal214

    magic underpants when you wear magic underpants it’s not cheating.

  • Maezeppa

    Mitt’s a lock I’ve been predicting for over a year that Mitt’s the one who will be nominated.  All the Bush machine is quietly behind him.

  • looloo

    wondering the same thing I have wondered the very same thing- when I was a kid the newsmen would talk about the news in Russia, contrasting our open system with their control of their citizens. They would even say how the official news mouthpiece ,Tass, had spun the news to always support what the goverment said. No tolerance for dissent of any kind.  The implication was that we were better than that.  We now have a republican party that seems offended by the very notion of more than one party. The biggest scoundrels openly flaunt the law and completely twist the news. Where else could an ex-drug addict like Rush Limbaugh possibly be taken seriously when criticizing others and supporting every lame idea to come out of this white house? It is like some episode of The Twilight Zone.

  • Ike Hall

    I respectfully disagree “Afghanistan” did not attack us. A few jihadists temporarily sheltered in Afghanistan did, and most of the folks on those planes were Saudi. However, this was a convenient excuse to roll in and change that inconvenient regime.

  • Ad1

    “when I was a kid”- How come it’s always the Russians who are manipulating the media? Here is filmmaker and journalist John Pilger on Russians who are amazed at OUR media control system:

    “One of my favorite stories about the Cold War concerns a group of Russian journalists who were touring the United States.

    On the final day of their visit, they were asked by the host for their impressions.

    “I have to tell you,” said the spokesman, “that we were astonished to find after reading all the newspapers and watching TV day after day that all the opinions on all the vital issues are the same. To get that result in our country we send journalists to the gulag. We even tear out their fingernails. Here you don’t have to do any of that. What is the secret?”

    What is the secret? It is a question seldom asked in newsrooms, in media colleges, in journalism journals, and yet the answer to that question is critical to the lives of millions of people.”

    In the same talk, John Pilger also reminds us of:

    “Edward Bernays, the so-called father of public relations, wrote about an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. He was referring to journalism, the media. That was almost 80 years ago, not long after corporate journalism was invented.”

    read the whole speech at

    http://www.democracy…

  • mikal214

    i agree….but. the plans did originate from there and even though the world abhorred our behavior in iraq, it supported our action in afghanastan.  we shouldn’t have stopped until we got bin laden, even if we had to go to pakistan to get him.  and we certainly have no business in iraq which we’ve turned into a al queda factory.

    we will not recover from bush’s folly for some time.

    how any republican running for president can defend such stupid foreign policy will be interesting to watch. 

     

  • strbrite

    Mitt’s a Twit I think it was in really poor taste when Romney commented about how he supports his sons who haven’t served their country and how his one son is “serving his country” by supporting him for president.  Bet that made all the parents feel really warm and fuzzy who have lost kids in the war.

    Ron Paul 2008!!!

  • strbrite

    Right on!!!! Yes, indeedy, RON PAUL 2008!!!!

  • srbrite

    Ron Paul… Why not register as a Republican and support Ron Paul?  You stated that you felt we should get behind candidates such as Paul.

    I can find nothing good in any of the other candidates.  Ron Paul wants to get back to the constitution, which Bush has left in tatters.  Smaller government, get rid of the illegal IRS.

    Let’s upset the old apple cart and get Ron Paul in office.  It upsets me greatly that Ron Paul wins ALL of the internet polls by huge margins but barely registers with the main stream media.  And then we have the likes of ABC who changes the results.

    I think they are actually afraid of Ron Paul.  This is the first time in years that I have felt like I have a candidate I can get behind rather than the lesser of two evils.

    I have been handing out Ron Paul Liberty Cards (google it) everywhere I go.  I even leave them laying around for others to find.

  • Ben

    A Man Can Be Both Hey Paul.  I practice law in California, but I went to high school in Austin, Texas, so we have that in common.  I love the city and all the concerts I was able to see there as a teenager.  My father was Air Force, so I spent my childhood moving around.

    I agree with your point that too many nationally are favoring someone who they think will win (specifically Rudy) versus the people who really match their values (shrink government, really reduce the abhorrent killing of babies, give states back their choice in creating laws, protect the constituion, solve the financial problems and the debt issues and save our country from broken entitlement programs, etc.)

    But you have Romney wrong if you think he isn’t the one who stands for all of those things.  And unlike Ron Paul, he has proven time and again that he can actually get it done on a massive scale!

    What an incredible opportunity with Mitt Romney to have someone who the social conservatives, fiscal conservatives, libertarians, fair tax advocates, and those who distrust the size of government and assumption that government can run your life better than you can can ALL get behind and support.  We have a rare opportunity in what appears to be a man who can do three critical things simultaneously: (1) actually win the nomination and general election by energizing the base in a way Rudy cannot, (2) actually match my ideals almost exactly, in the way Reagan did, and (3) actually succeed at implementing and leading in exactly the way he has outlined, with proven competence turning around distressed, scandal rocked security nightmares like the olympic games right after 9/11 or the bluest of the blue states, not to mention time and again in private business, turning record losses into record surpluses and restoring faith, respect, and trust in the organizations again at the same time.

    Ron Paul may have #2 for a lot of us, but he is missing #1 and perhaps more importantly, #3.  Fortunately, in this situation, one can have it ALL, in the form of Mitt Romney.

    Give Romney some more thought, Paul.  You seem like a bright guy who won’t be mislead by mischaracterizations.

Categories & Tags: |

Switch to our mobile site