Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.
A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.
The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.
BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.
CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.
TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.
DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.
All participating candidates raise hands to indicate that as president they would veto a plan with a 10-to-1 ratio of spending cuts to revenue increases.
AMES — Tensions reached their apex Thursday night during the Fox News/Washington Examiner GOP presidential debate, sending Republican enthusiasm through the roof with less than 48 hours until the Ames Straw Poll gates open Saturday.
Debate topics were typical: conflict in the Middle East, American’s floundering economy, immigration, states’ rights, and of course, hot button social issues. Not to be missed were references to dog food and Mickey Mouse.
Atypical? How candidates came out swinging — at each other, at President Barack Obama and even at the debate moderators.
Twice, U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn), a Straw Poll favorite and tea party darling, and former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty traded heated words about the other’s political records and policies.
Poised and never appearing flustered, Bachmann deflected attack after attack fired by Pawlenty, including her compromise on raising Minnesota’s state tax on cigarettes in 2005. Pawlenty was then Governor, Bachmann, a state lawmaker.
Bachmann explained she initially opposed the tax, but later compromised upon learning of a provision in the same legislation that gave strong support to the anti-abortion community and platform.
“You can get money wrong, but you can’t get life wrong,” she said in the debate.
Pawlenty, who has been slow to gain momentum in the Hawkeye State, came back swinging, claiming the Congresswoman’s D.C. record was void of anything substantial.
“As to her record: she’s done wonderful things in her life, absolutely wonderful things, but it’s an undisputed fact that her record in Congress in nonexistent,” Pawlenty said. “She’s got a record of misstating and making false statements.”
“You’re killing us,” Pawlenty told Bachmann, drawing audible reaction from the audience.
The Congresswoman remained on point, countering the Governor by comparing his own record to Obama’s, stating: “You said the era of small business is over. That sounds a lot like Barack Obama if you ask me.”
Within the first hour of the debate, Bachmann and Pawlenty’s volleys almost overshadowed the other six candidates. Forty-five minutes passed in the debate with only a couple minutes from former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum, a Catholic Conservative from Pennsylvania. Finally, in the second hour, a frustrated Santorum called Fox News moderator Bret Baier out for not giving him the same face time as Bachmann and Pawlenty, raising his hand and declaring, “I haven’t gotten to say a lot.”
Santorum and U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) sparred over American intervention in Iran, with the long-time Congressman blaming the U.S. for hostilities in Iran.
“Anyone who says Iran is not a threat is not seeing clearly,” Santorum said.
The former Senator also had his chance to stand out late in the debate, when he gave an impassioned argument on why the debt ceiling had to be raised — a stance the other candidates, particularly Bachmann, have taken vehemently against. Santorum maintained while it had to be raised, it should have been done so with a balanced budget in place.
Prominent Atlanta businessman Herman Cain seemed to spend a significant amount of his face time clarifying past comments and telling America that it “needs to learn to take a joke.” However, Cain also touted his private sector experience in repairing the economy.
“It is imperative we get this economy going in the in next 90 days,” after the next president is inaugurated, he said. One of the foundations to that is making tax rates permanent and setting a maximum tax rate for corporations.
But when asked about the bipartisan legislation that raised the debt ceiling, Romney bluntly said, “I’m not going to eat Barack Obama’s dog food. What he served up is not what I would have done as President of the United States.”
Fellow candidate Newt Gingrich, who served as U.S. House Speaker in the 1990′s, was even more blunt, calling the super-committee borne from the debt ceiling drama “dumb,” and characterized debate moderator Chris Wallace’s questions as “playing Mickey Mouse games.”
Obama was the target of several political missals from the candidates, who admonished the President’s economic and fiscal policies, as well as his military strategies overseas.
Huntsman stood out from the other seven participants on stage: the practicing Mormon believes “in traditional marriage first, but also civil unions. Our country can do better when it comes to equality,” and added the issue of marriage should go to the states. Most of the other candidates who spoke on the issue, with the exception of Paul, support a federal amendment defining marriage between one-man-one-woman exclusively.
Huntsman also has not publicly presented an economic development plan. However, he stated Thursday he would repeat the policies implemented in his native Utah.
“I’m going to do exactly what I did as Governor. It’s called leadership,” he said. “We cut taxes historically and created the most business-friendly environment in the country.”
And to those who are still flirting with a 2012 bid? Bring it on, candidates said.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry — expected to join the fray this weekend — and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin have not officially declared candidacy, but should they choose to, their would-be opponents are ready to welcome them to the field.
Mitt Romney is scum.Indiana is a republican state, but there is no chance in hell the GOP will get the Republican’s votes here if Mitt Romney is their candidate on the ballot.Not the man to represent our country.We won’t forget what you did here Mitt, and we damnsure won’t “forgive” you by electing you into our nation’s highest office just so you can do it to the rest of America.
Anonymous
what did he do to you?
Anonymous
I’m not sure but I heard a story recently on Mitt’s old company and it’s practice of buying companies, firing all it’s employees to make it’s bottom line look good, and resell it for a huge profit. The story I heard cited a company in Indiana that got this treatment.
I could be wrong
Anonymous
I wouldn’t be surprised. Activities like that should be criminalized.
http://www.facebook.com/jamesjvalko Jim Valko
Fox News Poll Who won the debate?
Over 24,000 votes had been cast with Paul at 11,359, followed by Newt
Gingrich who has 4,885. Herman Cain 2,564; Mitt Romney 1,940 and Michele
Bachmann 1,907
http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556
Let’s assume for the moment that the Bush tax cuts will expire at the end of 2012. (There’s no way an extension of the cuts will pass the Democratically-held Senate nor Obama a 2nd time, methinks.)
Therefore, isn’t it easy for these candidates to voice their opposition to raising taxes, knowing that they will be raised anyway? They get to look self-righteous about taxes and at the same time benefit from the additional revenue the taxes will generate for America.
Whoever wins or loses in 2012, they are going to have more money to work with.
Anonymous
Why was Rep. Michele Bachmann exempted from being asked
questions on illegal immigration? Her stance on this issue is far above the
rest who stood behind their dais in Ames, Iowa? Was this leaving Bachman out of
this social issue premeditated? Whether this was the case or not, she strands
strong as this uncontrolled illegal immigration invader problem has been
ignored by administrations for years. Bachmann
will not tolerate any form of Amnesty as President. Every Sanctuary City and state that does not comply by cutting of these
ordinances will lose federal funding. It’s been said many times before, that
American cannot afford to subsidize Mexico, Central America, Europe, Pacific
Rim or other nation; its inhabitants impoverished and desperate illegal
immigrants anymore? This illogical
problem is crippling America’s economy by the massive payouts for families,
which have migrated illegally across our sovereign border.
Of course open
border disciples, business lobbyist will deny the obvious, that this illegal incursion
is drowning us in debt—with no end in sight. (FAIR) American Federation
of Immigration Reform that of 2009, reported that overall costs to subsidize
the illegal alien household was calculated through, federal, State, County and
Municipal sources that it was a $113 Billion dollar problem. Federation for American Immigration Reform
issued a report in which they estimate the total annual costs of illegal
immigration at the federal, state and local level is estimated to be $113
billion combined. The states are bearing the burden of the costs; while the government
share is nearly $29 billion, it escalates to $84.2 billion at the state and
local level. The annual outlay that illegal aliens cost U.S. taxpayers is an
average amount per native-headed household of $1,117. The state-by-state
breakdown begins on page 4 of this report at: http://www.fairus.org/site/DocServer/USCostStudy_2010.pdf?docID=4921
Education for the children of illegal migrants and immigrants constitutes
the sole largest outlay to taxpayers, at an annual price tag of nearly $52
billion. Virtually all of those expenses are absorbed by state and local
governments. At the federal level, only about one-third of outlays are matched
by tax collections from illegal aliens. At the state and local level, an
average of less than 5 percent of the public costs is allied with the illegal
immigration occupation and recouped through taxes collected from illegal nationals.
Nearly all illegal aliens do not pay
income taxes; only those who do, much of the revenues collected are refunded to
the illegal immigrants when they file tax returns. Many are also claiming tax credits resultant in payments from the U.S.
Treasury. Please note this is not a static expenditure, but these dollars amounts
are raising all the time.
Ask yourself, why the Grand Canyon State of Arizona
had not choice, but to clamp down against the massive dollar amounts spent to appease
illegal alien homesteads How can a small South Western state that is mostly
desert, afford to pay out $2 Billion dollars annually for foreigners? Then
again– how can Leftist legislators in Sacramento, California, justify taking taxpayer’s
money and giving it to illegal aliens when these persons truly don’t exist,
other than in ICE enforcement records or Homeland Security? HAS ANY READER THOUGHT OF CHECKING THEIR STATES
PAYOUT TO FOREIGN NATIONALS? Although they come here through the magnet of
jobs, welfare and each year bring their children. The estimates of 300.000 babies enter via a broken, intermittent border
fence, that can no-way be fully enforced without the deployment of troops. Instant
citizen for babies is above most payments, is an incredulous cost forced on
taxpayers by Liberal judges legislating from their gavel.
Because entering America without papers is
not a—FELONY—it is essentially a giant hole in the wall, which imports
not only
millions of illegal aliens, but a massive population of criminals;
bringing
death, mayhem and ID theft on the unsuspecting citizens and residents.
As I said in my commentary yesterday, the only way to sever the
incentive of
jobs (which I never thought I would admit) is issuing every citizen and
legal
resident a government ID CARD. This could be used to get employed US
workers. (8
million illegal aliens have stolen jobs from mostly low income
Americans
according to reputable sources.) The same official ID card could be
presented
for voting; instead of the mess we have now, with convicted felons,
deceased
and illegal aliens, fraudulently using the election process to alter an
elections direction.
You would also use this federal ID CARD to be checked
against other data bases, official birth records to see if you have the right
to be issued a driver’s license, vehicle insurance, welfare or other Public
entitlements. I shouldn’t gloat over the welfare payouts in California, but it
is a self inflicted wound caused by the Liberals in the capitol. California,
the Godfather of Sanctuary State has a $19 Billion dollar budget gap, with a
staggering cost of $21 Billion $ according to the National Conference of State
Legislators in 2009. We must wonder how the welfare costs have escalated in two
years in the once Golden State?
I’m voting for Ron Paul this time. No more posers, and liars. The lessor of two evils is STILL EVIL.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_J6K37DAH5SHYQQ5Y77FKNJYFBM Rodolfo V.
This was not a debate, It was a love-Hate fest on President Obama! What the TEA party said was they were going to bring jobs to America in 2010! They Lied! They went in and tried to cut the funding for all the legislation passed by the 111th Congress. See the falseness of the rhetoric! Rick Perry and his TEA party are the ones to blame for the downgrading the USA in the eyes of the world! The down grading was a political move based on inferred logic amassed with prejudice against the president of the United States! No one should consider Perry the “Architect of Texas’ Miracle” because there is “Miracle in Texas.” Perry’s 34 billion dollar budget deficit smacks of liberal appointments to state agencies for his closest benefactors while throwing Texas’ children under the school bus! 17.2% living below the poverty line and first in illiteracy while paying teachers the lowest wages in the country. This career politician became a millionaire on the quarter of the Texas tax payers. Recent data shows he was a C+ cheer leader in college and forces his warped narrow-minded religious belief onto Texas women to get a Sonogram if pregnant. No one has the right to tell any one to get a health procedure except a physician. No one has the right to legislate bedroom privileges or rights anywhere in Texas or America! But this Yahoo and the radical extremes in Texas have done just that! Congress controls the purse string of America and the TEA party swayed their way into Congress promising to bring jobs to America! THEY LIED!