Former GOP lawmaker: Marriage equality consistent with conservative principles

Pretending that marriage is somehow legitimate if extremely incestuous below the level of biological dysfunctionality, (a.k.a.”gay marriage”) is a convenient delusional tactic that serves ulterior motives.  The ulterior motives, like trying to supplant the word ”perverted” by a more respectable contrivance such as “gay,” are to dress up homosexuality in the guise of something positive.  If people can be hypnotized to think perversion is ok because it’s swallowed as ’gay,’ and then perverted pseudomarriage is ok because it’s swallowed as ‘gay marriage,’  then of course the next step is to milk the taxpayers and private employers for spousal benefits.  The homosexuals have already snookered their way to special legal protections that everyone else doesn’t have– unless you can find a prosecutor who will prosecute a homosexual for discriminating against a heterosexual.  Lots of luck with that, especially when my experience in Johnson County is precisely otherwise, wherein a guy like former County Attorney Pat White would rather protect a lesbian lying blackmailer and her felonious misconduct than enforce the Code of Iowa.  We aren’t suppposed to add 2 + 2 and realize that when lesbian Anne Cleary did the same type of blackmail a few years later it was the last straw precipitating an already unstable Lu Gang into shooting dead 5 people at the University of Iowa (cf. the book “Deadly Scholarship” by Edwin Chen).  Beyond special privileges for a homosexual racket that has already taken over state institutions like the “University” and as many local governments as they can infiltrate, beyond expecting tax dollars to support entitlements for alleged spouses who contribute nothing to society, beyond expecting fringe benefits for ‘spouses’ from private industry, and beyond prejudicial laws and whatever freebies can be wheedled, only time will tell what pretexts are contrived next by homosexual racketeering along the stepping stone path of selfish incremental invention– but only if homosexual ‘marriage’ can be successfully peddled on the way.  Likely the next targets will include more pushing into the schools.  This is already being done very openly in Massachusetts (www.massresistance.org) where they advertise for school principals in homosexual magazines.  As the Family Research Council disclosed last month:  ((Start quote>>   For years, groups like FRC have been making compelling arguments against same-sex “marriage.” And this week, a homosexual activist may have made the best one of all. “Recruiting children?” writes Daniel Villarreal. “You bet we are.” After accusing voters of overreacting to the dangers of same-sex “marriage,” one homosexual confessed that parents are right to be worried. “Can we please just start admitting that we do actually want to indoctrinate kids?” he says on Queerty. (Warning: link contains obscene language.)”[Conservatives] accuse us of exploiting children and in response we say, ‘NOOO! We’re not gonna make kids learn about homosexuality, we swear! It’s not like we’re trying to recruit your children or anything.’ But let’s face it–that’s a lie. We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it… Why would we put anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?” << end quote for now.  FRC item has extra detail, omitted for space considerations here ))
The only thing that is unusual is that one homosexual racketeer named Daniel Villarreal feels strong enough to come out into the open with admitted facts that close observers have known about for years, even though this homosexual agenda racketeering was widely denied previously, and often is still. That's the nature of criminal conspiracies– they don't want society to know about their creeping lies, infiltrations, espionage, sabotage, and endless conniving distortions until they think their racket has built up sufficient strength.  Until then, they don't come out into the open but instead rely heavily on secret society tactics including endless denials– just as the Cosa Nostra Mafia did until Joe Valachi started singing.  What is publicized meanwhile is propaganda contrived to appear palatable, if only the target audience can be properly anesthetized first.  What isn't publicized  by the actors in the racket is documentation of homosexual racketeering such as can be found at http://www.johnnygosch.com thanks to stories from victims of the racket.  Facts derived from the Gosch family experience are of course hidden and denied as much as possible in proportion to the fact the guilty know they are guilty, and they don't want to be held responsible for doing what they know they are responsible for doing.  If you don't know, you won't do anything to expose or slow down the racket, and that is exactly what any racket wants.
 
Jeff Angelo is most likely wheedled and anesthetized to the point he can see only the Emerald City colors his homosexual handlers have rigged for him via his homosexual Land of Oz spectacles.  What a person doesn't know won't bother them as they are being exploited as a useful tool of the propaganda campaign.  One of the biggest scams is the focus on homosexual pseudomarriage, when that "issue" (under the contrived label "gay marriage') is merely another incremental stepping stone point on the pathway of the homosexual agenda.  "Gay marriage" is just a small calculated distraction from the real larger issue, which is the obsolete nature of homosexuality itself.  Why waste time being distracted by the red cape when the real issue is the matador's sword?  Homosexuals don't want normal people noticing homosexuality, when the gullible can be distracted into keeping their heads bowed down to stare at myriad contrived irrelevant sideshow amusements.  "Gay marriage" fits the bill quite nicely for serving the distractive irrelevancy objectives of the homosexual agenda.  But only if the gullible and anesthetized can be manipulated into not noticing that atrocious obsolete irrelevance of homosexuality which is itself the larger issue.
 
Once a person has seen the selfish and vicious nature of homosexual racketeering in a place like Iowa City, or any other setting, it makes one wonder as to the larger picture of homosexuality itself:  how can it be that such dysfunctional individuals and networks would come into existence and occur across the planet?  Considering how selfish, egotistical, narcississtic, and pathological homosexuality is, it is amazing it wasn't long ago eliminated to extinction by the ordinary evolutionary processes of Darwininan natural selection. Although homosexuality is rare in the animal world it is seen more often in humans.  Why?  It's because our children have prolonged vulnerable juvenile phases and need extra layers of protection. 
 
During most of historic time throughout the evolution of Homo sapiens, our ape and caveman ancestors had to live marginally as migrating tribes of highly competitive hunter-gatherers.  The average tribe consisted of about 100-150 individuals because fewer couldn't support and defend themselves well in most parts of the world, and a larger tribe tended to overgraze the local ecological niche to the point of starvation. Population density was about one person per square mile in any temporary hunting territory of about ten or twelve miles by about ten or twelve miles– the area that could be patrolled, used, and protected against intruding caveman competitors. The core of each tribe was about a dozen guys bred to go off on hunting and warring trips.  This is reflected in the modern fascination with watching about a dozen muscle-bound maniacs chase some kind of ball or another in the face of another dozen or so adversaries.  That type of thing used to determine who hunted down food and who starved, plus who did the slaughtering in battle over hunting territory vs. who was slaughtered, so to this day we are hard-wired by the results of Darwinian selection to be interested in contests of a dozen on this team vs. a dozen on that team.  A much smaller number has a hard time cornering and spearing antelopes or deer and defending against rival tribes, and a much larger number is hard to direct for stealthy hunting or keeping under one strongman's rule.  For similar practical reasons of achievement, stealth, command, and control, an Army squad is about a dozen soldiers as a further reflection of what evolution has selected for human vs. human competition as to effective unit size.  
 
For hundreds of thousands of previous years, and for most of the thousands of years since the latest version of our species has come into existence, male mortality was so high from daily hunting and combat that for each adult male there were about three or four adult females.  This in modern times is reflected in that a modern woman will be fertile for only about a third of any given month because her current newly-matured egg will live for only about 11 days.  Also, this is why during the infertile menstrual period, when women cannot become pregnant anyway, it is good for the species for the non-impregnable women to be behaviorally obnoxious and thus drive the caveman and his sperm cells off in the direction of other women who might be in the fertile phase of the month.  There is a reason why, when a woman is temporarily infertile and low on her essential estrogen, it is good for the species for her to act as (not like) a bitch on a rag.  
 
Beyond the dozen cavemen and forty or so cavewomen were the children, produced at the rate of about one per woman per year but with a very high rate of child mortality depending on weather, starvation, and diseases as simple as diarrhea, as seen in modern impoverished nations.  Cavemen and their harems were self-sufficient and producing the next generation about age fifteen, which means that once they got to about age thirty and their children had grown to fifteen, the "anyone over thirty" crowd was, to the evolutionary needs of the species, obsolete, discardable, and just plain basically in the way of the younger crowd who needed whatever food the ecological niche could supply.   This is why we are evolved to start falling apart past the age of thirty– for thousands of years anyone older than that hasn't been essential to the severe demands of Darwin's survival of the fittest.  More specifically, our immune systems are controlled by the T-cells from the thymus.  These are the cells specifically attacked by the AIDS virus, and when they are taken out the immune system falls apart to the mortal danger of the human so afflicted.  When we are born our thymuses are at their apogee of size and they slowly wither or involute as we develop through childhood.  By age twenty-five little of the thymus is left, and about age thirty nothing functional is left of the thymus– only perhaps some wasted wisps of useless tissue residue.  Who needs an immune system to stay alive in the Stone Age past 30 or 35 when you are just an aging cripple who is in the way of those members of the species bearing fresh new combinations of DNA? So, very few in that harsh world made it to the ripe old age of even 39. (Note:  the last T-cells produced in the late 20's can if pampered survive in the blood for another thirty years or so, which is why modern humans with cushy lives supported by agriculture and technology can survive ordinarily until our 60's.  After that, we irrevocably fall apart at an increasing rate as the remaining T-cells decline in number rapidly, and can therefore no longer protect us from infectious, degenerative, and malignant disease processes.) 
 
To avoid starvation, the tribe's men had to frequently take their squad off hunting and patrolling the manageably-sized hunting territory, as well as prospecting for new areas to hunt when the current game supply was depleted or migrated away.  Who would be left during hunting to guard the women and children from enemy tribes and hungry beasts meanwhile?  Enemy tribes survived best if they destroyed competing broods such as yours.  They loved to plunder, rape, and pillage– carrying off the most desirable women and booty to their own harems.  Just look at modern soliders run amok and exhibiting the uncivilized behavior of apes.  There were also roving wolves, cave bears, and other ferocious beasts who had their own young to feed at your expense.  So, who would be left to guard the women and children back at the cave when the men were off hunting?  The tribes that evolved homosexual males had an advantage in evolutionary competition.  They were functional eunuchs who could be trusted back home to not impregnate the harem, yet they had the muscular strength of men for defending the cave even if they preferred painting it or killing time in theatrical performances with costumes done up in the latest B.C. fashion.  If a homosexual male were killed defending the cave in exchange for food, his death didn't cost the life of a father who had a greater survival interest in his own children.  
 
At the same time, if a few women hated to engage in reproductive frolicking and/or were too ugly to be alluring, it would be an evolutionary survival advantage to have a few lesbians around to help with the time demands of childcare.  Human babies need a lot of attention, and so without grandparents surviving to old age past 30 or 40 to help with defense or childcare, the lesbians could help the species survive by babysitting in the caves while mama got some rest or went foraging.  The lesbians were also expendable foragers themselves, since if a predator bagged one instead of mother it wouldn't be a risk to baby's survival. 
 
That's the way it was thousands of years ago, when there was a Darwininan caveguard and babysitting use for homosexuality.  The tribes doing things that way prospered, and those that didn't tended to be outcompeted.  Similarly, those who practiced murder and rape and stealing prospered at the expense of those who didn't.  In the absence of law, the only rule was by muscle and fang.  Then we evolved enough in various places around the world about 6,000-8,000 years ago that we could develop agriculture, and later some technology, so we could settle down in fixed locations for a stable food supply and easier lives.  People could live commonly rather than rarely past the age of 30, so surviving grandparents and their accumulated wisdom toward law, government, science, history, techology, and writing became possible. That wisdom accumulated from experience became an asset in Darwininan selection favoring the tribes that possessed it.  Population density and the frequency of venereal disease became more common, particularly leading to taboos about previously unregulated sexual behavior.  These taboos were expressed in newly evolved law, religion, and religious laws.  Population density, proximity, and interdependency made murder, rape, and stealing deleterious to a society that had previously not existed, and villages that were harmonious and responsibly governed prospered in Darwinian competition against villages that could not cooperate amongst the inhabitants under any system of laws observed in common.  
 
Homosexuality evolved to serve the Darwininan competition needs of Stone Age and earlier bonobo-level primate existence.  But once we progressed out of the Stone Age, homosexuality became obsolete particularly as to the tendency toward avoidable diseases originating in the homosexual males.  With grandparents, babysitters, and occasionally police now available to protect children, the utility of homosexuality has become an obsolete atavism.  Other atavisms include the monkey tail our ancestors used to need.  It  has withered to the vestigial coccygeal bones, which are seen protruding like a monkey's tail only among a few babies born with that atavism. Treacher-Collins and Pierre-Robin Syndromes are atavisms harkening back to the days when our ancestors were fish and needed gill slits to survive.  Lanugo seen on some babies born a few days early is another atavism that reflects the fact that not too long ago our ancestors were hairy apes.  Behavioral atavisms include the Moro reflex, a harkening back to baby monkeys surviving best when falling if they reach out and grab passing tree branches.  Another behavioral atavism is the instinct to cough when the ear canal (a relic of ancient fish gill slits) is cleaned with a Q-tip, harkening back to fish wanting to keep their gill breathing apparatus cleared of debris. 
 
Homosexuality is just another obsolete atavism, and we are fools if we allow those exhibiting it to pose as dictatorial leaders of other humans when homosexuality was evolved as an accessory function for tending to the harem and the brood.  Homosexuals by their actions exhibit their evolved unfitness for leadership in the modern world, just as they were subservient in the prehistoric world.  And by tending to congregate around the young for purportedly educational purposes they further illustrate the ends to which they were designed by evolutionary processes.  The job of homosexuals is to serve rather than direct society, and the job of society is definitely not to serve the selfish agendas of homosexuals no matter how intricate their guile may be.  Homosexuality although formerly useful has evolved to become irrelevant, and imaginary pseudomarriages based on an obsolete irrelevancy are likewise irrational.

Liberality – In 2007 the FDA said it would change its policy if given data that show doing so wouldn’t pose a “significant and preventable” risk to blood recipients. That was 4 years ago already so why hasn’t the law been changed? If you want to see the reality of what is coming to Iowa go to: http://www.massresistance.org and see for yourself. Don’t just read the information take time to actually look at the pictures and see what our Iowa cities will be subjected to shortly. Jeff Angelo is another Mitt Romney Republican who didn’t have an understanding of this matter to begin with and caved to the special interests of gays in Mass. There’s nothing worse than a RHINO in office!

Sorry ladies but Iowa will eventually follow all 31 previous states that voted down gay/lesbian marriages in a public vote. The battle is just getting started in Iowa!  I’m not here to judge your sexual choices but I will petition my government to protect marriage between a man and woman and in the end you will be defeated. I’m sure that in the meantime you will both continue to call for a culture of hedonism and chaos, you will support hate crime legislation to have your opponents illegally arrested, you will continue to trash your country because of your heart of ungratefulness and freedom is already yours, you will continue to hurl your vulgar insults and diversions at anyone who stands in your way to promote anarchy. Your all the motivation I need to redouble my efforts to fight to save our culture from ruin.

Blah, blah, blah. get some real information from some real sources. It’s very telling how you have yet to truly answer any of the questions posed to you. You make insulting, wild accusations, but never cite any recognized research correlating gays being given their civl rights, that you so cavalierly enjoy, to your dumbass claims. Then you actually have the gall to claim you are the victim. You act like you walk the path of the righteous, yet you are absolutely the opposite. You want to know why religion has failed? It is because of hypocrites like you who PRETEND to be virtuous Christians but are nothing of the sort. Every hateful thing you spew is incompatible with you PROFESSED Christian beliefs. You conveniently forget things like “love thy neighbor” and “though shall not judge” and “we are all God’s children” to serve your vile, ignorant, simpleminded, spoon-fed view. Religion is supposed to be inclusive. It is supposed to be about spreading love and caring about the well-being of your fellow man; things you continue to prove you know nothing about. It is you and people like you who are responsible for the suicide of many young people. IT IS YOU WHO HAS BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS. I haven’t worked and spent billions to keep you from being able to determine the health care of a loved one, or tried to keep you from receiving your partner’s benefits. you want to deny us marriage because of the economic cost?!?! Really ?!?! How very Christian of you, you amoral hypocrite. I dare you to answer with SOUND logic or CREDIBLE research from a recognized institution. Don’t give bullshit responses based on your religion (of which I am still certain you know nothing about). Your religion is not the institution upon which this country is governed (you know, that little thing call “separation of church and state”). Your religion has no authority over our government.  Don’t tell me our law and constitution are based on the principles of your bible. Had the architects of this country intended the bible to be the governing authority of this nation, they would not have bothered to create an independent document called the Constitution. It is interesting that not once have you attempted to refute or even acknowledge the basic tenets of the Constitution, such as the aforementioned separation of church and state, all men are created equal and ALL MEN ARE ENTITLED to LIFE, LIBERTY, and the PURSUIT of HAPPINESS. You also have not been able to defend how you’re attempt to deny gays equal treatment under the law is not in conflict with the Constitution. I understand. It is the same reason the Obama administration has stated it will not defend DOMA, because it is indefensible. Except in the minds of the easily deluded. So, once again, utilizing actual credible research, answer these very pertinent questions, which you have thus far been unable to do. Exactly how is YOUR marriage endangered by MY gay marriage (or any marriage, for that matter)? The divorce rate for heterosexuals is over 50%. How has DOMA helped that? If straight marriage is so sacred, how come you can get drunk and go get married 5 minutes after you get your unappreciative ass to Vegas? Sixty percent of married couples cheat on their spouses, yet truly committed and faithful couples aren’t legitimate families? Do you even understand the difference between the civil marriage we seek and your religious one? What entitles you to vote on the civil rights of ANYONE else? What makes you or your religion the moral authority in a nation based on a separate, independent document which is universally acknowledged as the governing document of this nation? Why are you entitled to the civil benefits of MY tax dollars but I am not, remembering that marriage does not belong to religion? This is no different than taxation without representation. I doubt you’ve heard of that. Funny how gay tax dollars also pay for your spawns’ education, and the social security benefits YOUR family would be entitled to, but not mine, thanks to heartless people of ilk. Then you have the gall to complain about covering us in MA. Equally funny is how you have probably benefitted from the care of a gay physician, or inventions and innovations of gay scientists or artists, or had your food prepared by a gay chef. You’ll claim that this is nothing but an assault on your character. Try fighting for your very existence and let’s see you you respond. We will no longer stay in the closet just so that you can live comfortably with your hateful, bigoted views. We will never stop fighting for justice. More and more will continue to rise and we will one day have equality because truth and justice will always prevail in the end. Stop your insidious, despicable, and ludicrous claims about how allowing gays their equality will bring about the demise of the world. I don’t know a single person who wants to marry a goat or a turtle (and people who jump right to that from gay marriage are the sick and f*cked up ones, I say). Although, there seems to be plenty of “good Christians” who want and CAN marry their first cousins (how many arms do you need?) And all those other dumbass claims you made, there are already plenty of straights in jail for committing them. Now, go raise your little haters. Just think, all that time you wasted cut and pasting you could have spent doing some actual good in the world. I will post a link to a video just for you. Maybe you’ll allow yourself to learn something, anything! Maybe you will understand empathy, though I doubt it. Whether you watch it or not, I don’t care. I doubt you have the balls or the integrity to even see the error of your ways. I’m done trying to enlighten someone so obviously afraid of the truth. You need not respond because I won’t bother to look at any more cutting and pasting of text. I know the legacy I will leave behind when I am dead and gone (excited about that prospect? I bet you are!) and I can face the person in the mirror. And I will show you more compassion than you as such a “good Christian” has espoused for others in your comments. I pity you and your ugly soul. May your god also take pity because, if there is a Hell, you’ve got a first-class ticket.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL-G8A34U14&feature=youtube_gdata_player