Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Flickr Photo by  Iowa Democratic Party
Flickr Photo by Iowa Democratic Party

Harkin: Ag whistleblowers shouldn’t be penalized

Iowa House votes 65-27 to criminalize undercover stings in agriculture
By Lynda Waddington | 03.17.11 | 10:34 am

Moments before members of the Iowa House voted to institute new criminal penalties for those involved in undercover sting operations at agricultural facilities, U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin cautioned that such penalties don’t appear to be in the public’s best interest.

Harkin, who has not studied the specifics of the bills before Iowa and other state lawmakers, said at first blush the proposals sound like something that would not be good public policy.

“Thankfully, because of whistleblowers and others doing undercover work, we are finding out about a lot of the abuses that are taking place in animal agriculture — and some of those abuses have just been awful,” Harkin said during a conference call with reporters.

“[Such abuses] should not be allowed to continue, but a lot of the time they are done in isolated places [where] people don’t know about it.”

The Iowa House measure, House File 589, which was introduced and floor managed by state Rep. Annette Sweeney, a north-central Iowa rancher, prohibits individuals or groups from “interfering with an animal facility or crop operation.” Such interference, as defined in the bill, would include audio and visual recordings and their distribution. Those found guilty of interference would be prosecuted for an aggravated misdemeanor crime on a first offense and of a class D felony on any subsequent offenses.

In addition, the bill makes it a crime (fraud) for an individual to gain access to an animal facility or crop operation under false pretenses. First offenders would face an aggravated misdemeanor charge and subsequent offenses would garner felony prosecution.

In Iowa, conviction on a class D felony would subject an individual to a maximum of five years in prison and a fine of up to $7,500. Convictions on charges of aggravated misdemeanor carry a term of up to two years in prison, and a fine of up to $6,250.

A similar bill, Senate File 431, was introduced in the Iowa Senate by Sen. Tom Rielly (D-Oskaloosa). It will likely remain stagnant as members of the Senate take up the measure already approved by the Iowa House.

Whistleblowers, often affiliated with animal rights organizations, have often gone undercover at agricultural operations throughout the nation. Their reports, which are often in video format, have documented serious abuses and, many times, have prompted state and federal officials to further investigate the facility or plant.

“I’d have to take a look at the proposal, but I’d not, in any way, want to make it criminal for someone to be able to disclose to the public these types of abusive practices,” Harkin said.

Before approving a final version of the bill, Iowa House members included two amendments — H1278 and H1375. The amendments clean up language in the bill and exclude certain operations (animal shelters, boarding kennels and pet shops).

Follow Lynda Waddington on Twitter


Comments

  • Anonymous

    If your business operation can’t stand public scrutiny and you’re afraid to be exposed, then you shouldn’t be in business.

    What’s next, criminalizing the posting of comments opposed to the Stalinist stupidity of Annette Sweeney and Tom Rielly?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

      Let me copy and paste what farmer_scratch wrote about this:

      The “whistleblowers” are in the wrong when they do not report the alleged abuse IMMEDIATELY to their supervisor or farm owner. That is what this law is all about. It is about people possibly inciting animal abuse, filming it, sometimes over the course of weeks, instead of stopping the abuse immediately. They are not interested in stopping the abuse. They are interested in making farmers look bad.

      Some of them have even signed paperwork upon being hired that they will report abuse immediately. Then they DO see some and do not report it. This is wrong.

      • Anonymous

        Please provide verifiable examples of people “inciting” animal abuse in order to film it. I’m sure you’ve already reported such miscreants to law enforcement for appropriate action.

        While we’re waiting for your evidence, let’s ponder this: Why do you suppose the documented abuses are found so many times, in such egregious, sickening degrees? For the same reason that a few self-interested people want to cover up the evidence: They want to make money without the food-consuming public knowing the facts of how animals are treated in such facilities.

        Let me copy and paste what I wrote about this: If your business operation can’t stand public scrutiny and you’re afraid to be exposed, then you shouldn’t be in business.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

          If I were you and I wanted an answer to this question I would contact individuals in the livestock industry. You know, give them some public scrutiny and determine if they are afraid to be exposed. I think most people take care of their livestock and that you are using the examples from the worst offenders to punish the vast majority of those who don’t abuse animals.

          • Anonymous

            In other words, you have no such evidence, as I suspected from the beginning.

            I’m not interested in punishing “the vast majority” who don’t abuse animals. I’m interested in getting the existing abuse stopped and the violators prosecuted and held accountable. Hiding the abuse from public view behind a curtain drawn by one’s buddies in the Iowa Legislature sure as hell isn’t going to do that.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

            I never claimed to have any “evidence” of what you are looking for but I think farmer_scratch would agree when I say that this issue does not reflect the majority of those in the livestock industry. If you want to root out animal abuse, don’t put regulations into place that have the potential to harm the business of those who do not abuse animals. Go after the abusers without trying to screw those who don’t habitually abuse.

          • Anonymous

            So now you’ve gone from (1) adopting another person’s assertion that there are people inciting abuse to (2) denying that you adopted such an assertion to (3) asserting now that it’s “regulations” that concern you.

            Keep going, you’re helping your side a lot.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

            That’s quite imaginative. I didn’t do any of that.

          • Anonymous

            And just exactly what part of “Let me copy and paste what farmer_scratch wrote about this:” are you disavowing? Those of us who can read English are perplexed.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

            I copied and pasted a comment. You imagined that I was “adopting another person’s assertion.” I suggested that you contact folks in the livestock business but you continue to make snippy comments that don’t aid stopping animal abuse.

          • Anonymous

            Okay, I’ll try this once, for my own amusement.

            WHAT EXACTLY DID YOU INTEND TO COMMUNICATE BY COPYING AND PASTING THAT COMMENT, IF NOT TO ADOPT ITS ASSERTIONS AS YOUR OWN?

      • Anonymous

        Please provide verifiable examples of people “inciting” animal abuse in order to film it. I’m sure you’ve already reported such miscreants to law enforcement for appropriate action.

        While we’re waiting for your evidence, let’s ponder this: Why do you suppose the documented abuses are found so many times, in such egregious, sickening degrees? For the same reason that a few self-interested people want to cover up the evidence: They want to make money without the food-consuming public knowing the facts of how animals are treated in such facilities.

        Let me copy and paste what I wrote about this: If your business operation can’t stand public scrutiny and you’re afraid to be exposed, then you shouldn’t be in business.

  • Citizen Kane

    Gotcha reports will never be pretty, but just because I don’t like what is being reported or feel it is offensive, can I say it is wrong to catch someone in an act that offends, and some small group of people can disagree with the justice in the topic? I think not. Even a wrong committed against a few individuals beliefs, is a wrong. The decision if the few are just in their belief is up to our judicial system to sort out.
    I am sure “To catch a predator” is offensive to pedophiles and is very hard to watch for all of us, but it does do a service for our children if it stops a single act against our loved ones.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

      So you like gotcha reports? You should write about Eric.

  • Anonymous

    We have traffic cams, ATM cams, business security cams, all to make sure individuals aren’t doing criminal things (like speeding, oh noes!)…but individuals can’t do their own recording of criminal acts perpetrated by industry? Did I miss the vote to make corporations our superiors, allowed to influence politics and law, but exempt from repercussions? Because that’s a vote on rights I would really love to have.

    • Anonymous

      The supreme court voted for us in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

        I’d like to know who “us” is.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

        I’d like to know who “us” is.

        • Anonymous

          Not you.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

            I know, that’s my point.

  • Anonymous

    The “whistleblowers” are in the wrong when they do not report the alleged abuse IMMEDIATELY to their supervisor or farm owner. That is what this law is all about. It is about people possibly inciting animal abuse, filming it, sometimes over the course of weeks, instead of stopping the abuse immediately. They are not interested in stopping the abuse. They are interested in making farmers look bad.

    Some of them have even signed paperwork upon being hired that they will report abuse immediately. Then they DO see some and do not report it. This is wrong.

    • Anonymous

      Please provide verifiable examples of people “inciting” animal abuse in order to film it. I’m sure you’ve already reported such miscreants to law enforcement for appropriate action.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XEFGEOUH52QNNSCD233KGH7UE4 Wendy Peterson

        If I were you and I wanted an answer to this question I would contact individuals in the livestock industry. You know, give them some public scrutiny and determine if they are afraid to be exposed. I think most people take care of their livestock and that you are using the examples from the worst offenders to punish the vast majority of those who don’t abuse animals.

      • Anonymous

        Well I did say Possibly inciting animal abuse. Some of the jerks that they have “caught” have been true jerks but I think there was at least one case where the people filming it incited the abuse. Do you think it is right that they hold the film for a month before using it? Do you think it is right not to point out that an employee is abusing a farmer’s animals TO THE FARMER SO HE CAN STOP IT???????? That is what they are doing. They just want to push their vegan agenda and this is as offensive to me as shoving meat down their throat (this would be offensive to me also.) We do not shove meat down their throat. We do not force anyone to consume anything they do not want. They want to take away my right to consume animal protein and that is not right either. Vegans are free to be vegans but they should leave the rest of us alone.

    • Anonymous

      Please provide verifiable examples of people “inciting” animal abuse in order to film it. I’m sure you’ve already reported such miscreants to law enforcement for appropriate action.

Switch to our mobile site