Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Virginia Tea Party Convention - Day 2

King to take aim at birthright citizenship when GOP assumes control of Congress

By Jason Hancock | 11.22.10 | 9:00 am

U.S. Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) says he will quickly move a bill aimed at denying citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants who are born in the United States once he becomes chairman of the congressional subcommittee that oversees immigration in January.

Those children are currently automatically granted citizenship at birth under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which says all person “born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

In an interview with Douglas Burns for Cityview, King said he plans to pass a law concerning birthright citizenship and wait for opponents to challenge the bill in court. If the court sides against him, King said he would then move to amend the U.S. Constitution to change the statute.

From Cityview:

King went on to say that automatic citizenship, which results in what he called “anchor babies” for illegal immigrant parents, is a “habit of the heart so to speak.”

“The framers did not consider the babies of illegals when they framed the 14th amendment because we didn’t have immigration law at the time so they could not have wanted to confer automatic citizenship on the babies of people who were unlawfully in the United States,” King said.

It’s important to note that children can’t sponsor their parents for citizenship until they turn 21. And since undocumented immigrants have to return home for 10 years before applying to come back to the U.S., having a baby to secure citizenship is an extremely long and uncertain process.

And as Robin Templeton reports at The Nation, having an “anchor baby” doesn’t do much as far as garnering federal benefits.

Federal welfare reform passed in 1996 disqualified most immigrants, including most legal permanent residents, from receiving almost all forms of public assistance and imposed a five-year waiting period on applications for assistance on all future immigrants. Researchers estimate that these new restrictions accounted for more than half of the vaunted savings during the first year of welfare reform.

An estimated 340,000 of the 4.3 million babies born in the United States in 2008 were the children of undocumented immigrants, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data by the Pew Hispanic Center done last year. Of those children, 85 percent of the parents had been in the country for more than a year, and more than half for at least five years.

Follow Jason Hancock on Twitter


Comments

  • Anonymous

    This proposed change to the 14th amendment Is wrong and unnecessary. It will do nothing to stop illegal immigration and will only, eventually allow for the further erosion of the rights of citizens. One of the most important rights under the 14th amendment is the right to equal protection under the law. This is the right that grants children of immigrants, weather they were born in this country or not the same access to fundamental services such as public education and social services. Changing the child’s citizenship status will not change that right. If King want’s to change the Equal Protection clause, he risks undoing the basis for all civil rights decisions in federal courts, including Brown v. Board of Education. Do we really want to go back to the 1950s in this regard?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TLKMYXNEHVHKSQW5MYPEPCEJXA Morgan's Spot

      “Do we really want to go back to the 1950s in this regard?”

      That is *exactly* what they want to do! Do not doubt it for a minute!

      • Anonymous

        The 50′s rocked. It was pre liberal. Their were expectations. People knew their parents and knew God. No kids holdin their pants up, droppin f bombs, droppin out, gettin welfare, and a man like Obama would have been rightfully laughed off the stage, not given a pass for having brown skin.
        No generations on welfare. No political crrectness.
        50′s were a great time in America.

        • Anonymous

          I agree – let’s turn back the clock to a time when people had jobs with insurance, earned their own money and paid ther own way without welfare. What was the national debt back then – a hundred million dollars or so?
          All this “cheap” immigrant labor is very expensive in terms of social spending. Why do you think our national debt now is 15 Trillion dollars and immigrant-rich states like CA a broke as a joke?

    • Anonymous

      Yes. That is point! Not a Citizen – no rights to any social services. This removes their incentive to come to the utopian welfare state that we are headed to. And that welfare state will only result in mutually assure d poverty for all. Including you.

  • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

    Steve King, ah, Steve King: Iowa’s contribution to bigotry. Here he goes off again looking for ways to squash people he doesn’t like — foreigners, liberals, gays, non-Christians, non-whites.

    And once again attempting to introduce a bill that has zero chance of clearing committee, let alone becoming law. I suppose he can do what he wants, tilting at windmills he imagines are threats. But why do the people in his district think he is representing their best interests? Surely there is some other conservative out there that could be useful instead?

    • Anonymous

      ‘Zero’ chance of clearing committee? With the GOP in charge of it? Doubtful. And 12 MILLION illegals (three times the population of Ireland) is not an ‘imaginary’ threat, egc…and that is PATHETIC, trying to make opposition to foreign invasion about being ‘white’ or ‘Christian.’ FYI I’m from Iowa myself, and I support King completely…and I’m not a Xtian, not a Repub, and not even a Tea Partier. In fact, I’m a former union member, my great-great grandfather fought for the North under Sherman, and my family are Jewish — which in itself will probably get on your nerves, since you are a typical ‘tolerant, broad-minded’ progressive, and we know what they generally think about the Jews (virtually indistinguishable from the Klan). So before you fake concern for minorites and pretend the conservative majority is ‘against’ them (don’t tell Marco Rubio, New Mexico’s new governor Susana Martinez, Bobby Jindal, Nikki Haley (both of Asian descent) or new black Congressman Tim Scott of South Carolina) — and therefore by default YOU are ‘for’ them — please look in the mirror, because YOU are bigoted yourself — quite extremely, against anyone, anywhere who dares disagree with YOU. Don’t play that ‘pro-minority’ sh-t with me or anyone else, fella. You’re our ENEMY, not our friend.

      And there’s no excuse for backing illegal aliens. You’re on the losing side of that issue, too.

      • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

        Such hate. Sad, sad, sad.

        And such errors too: (1) I’m not Christian, I’m Jewish; (2) I don’t care what your great-great-grandfather did — that doesn’t give you a pass to your bigoted views today; (3) Just because an immigrant is here illegally doesn’t make him a “threat” — most illegal immigrants are productive to America; (4) King’s actions aren’t aimed at the illegal immigrants, they are aimed at the immigrants’s children… so all your “threat” arguments are aimed at children. CHILDREN.

        Open your eyes. King and his ilk (you?) are bigots.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DP7AIXGQJ6G57BRIZBMGJUXUJA Rodney Green

    Has anyone challanged King’s citizenship or that of the members of his family? If he is not native American then his birth was that of an illegal alien in this land.

    • Anonymous

      Wrong, Rodney. King’s ancestors…like yours, like mine, came here LEGALLY. Besides, all those people in the days of the cowboys and Indians are long DEAD. Any wrongs then do not make it right (for illegals), now. This is an irrelevant matter, which will get you nowhere.

    • Anonymous

      Another Ignorant statement. A child should only be a U.S. citizen if one of the parents is 100% a U.S. Citizen.

      • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

        Well, you’ve got a problem then. Because many, many, many, many of “100% U.S. Citizens” are descendants of illegal immigrants. If you want to unwind the citizenship of the past 234 years you’ll have few people left who can match your criteria. Shall we start with you? Shall we require you to produce the documentation of citizenship for all of your ancestors?

        At some point we have to just live with the FACT that the illegal immigrants are here, and they aren’t going away, and we’re not capable of finding and deporting them all. Once you accept that FACT, then you can begin to form a policy that somehow incorporates them and/or their descendants into America’s main-stream.

        Until then, taking swipes as illegal immigrants is useless at best, and bigoted at worst (which is how I read Steven King.)

        • Anonymous

          If you think we should just give up and let them vote Democrat dictators like Obama in once 20 million of them now outweigh real americans at the polls who have earned their citizenship and paid their taxes get lost. This will politically change America and shortchange our way of life and i say Hell no. You move to Mexico if you like them so much.

          • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

            I didn’t say give up. I said face facts.If you have a plan to find and round up all the illegal immigrants, propose it. What’s the budget? Who is going to pay for it? Shall we raise taxes to do that? How much man-power is needed? Can we create jobs for legal citizens by putting them to work in deporting illegals?You don’t want to give up? Then fine… what are you going to do besides post messages?Any proposals based on actual facts?Anything at all?Going once… twice….

          • Anonymous

            Substantially fine any businesses that hire illegal aliens. Draft legislation that denys welfare benefits to illegal citizens. Empower State and local officials (not like the feds did in Arizona) to legally question immigration status and deport as well as audit local and state businesses to check status. If we make it too much of hastle to get employment they will not come. If we do not do somthing this will eventually become a banna republic with a dictator who cannot be voted out by the taxpayers. Or is that why the government purposely ignores it.

          • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

            Oh, and by the way, I DO like immigrants. They’ve made America what it is: rich, diverse, open minded, and a beacon of hope for the unwanted, hated, and oppressed of the world.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6G7SCCHDV645DUNIX2KDVDO32I William

          Try taking a trip to East Oakland or East and South LA, maybe Phoenix, North Vegas, Portland and many other fine cities DESTROYED by the southern invader. I dare you to walk down the streets not in the middle of the night but HIGH NOON! And they will skin your lily white rear-end alive. It seams to me sir that you speak of matters you have no clue about. Tell you what, send your daughter or your wife or your mother. These people you defend are nothing more than animals who are here to reconquer and that is no joke.

          • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

            It didn’t take long for the bigots to appear. “These people .. are nothing more than animals” indeed.

  • Anonymous

    Those that don’t live in CA are clueless. CA is going into the trash from illegal immigration. Your turn is next Iowa. News flash: It is illegal for social workers here to ask or inquire in any way if someone is here illegally. I had a Mexican girlfriend that thought I was a bigot and that I was crazy for complaining about illegals until she got a social services job and saw all the tax money the illegals are sucking up through social services. Most lie about their real income. You won’t hear this on the news since I know it’s not politically correct to say it, but its the illegals that have bankrupted CA and it’s only going to get worse unless bills like this are passed.

    • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

      Ask your girlfriend what would happen if the illegals were made legal. Wouldn’t they start to pay taxes? Wouldn’t they stop hiding their real income? Wouldn’t they then compete for jobs on the same footing as other citizens, instead of taking lousy below-minimum-wage jobs that only an illegal would accept?

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KBP2YETWTPAJGEDGL4AJIUYJNE Big

        Again, you are a fool. Illegals, and their LEGAL children, are already taking good jobs from legal Americans. Maybe you’ll wake up the day the child of an illegal takes your job.

        • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

          Nope. Wrong facts. viz: http://www.factcheck.org/2010/05/does-immigration-cost-jobs/

          “But most economists and other experts say there’s little to support the claim. Study after study has shown that immigrants grow the economy, expanding demand for goods and services that the foreign-born workers and their families consume, and thereby creating jobs. There is even broad agreement among economists that while immigrants may push down wages for some, the overall effect is to increase average wages for American-born workers.”

        • Anonymous

          Maybe you’ll wake up the day the child of an illegal takes your job.

          The child of an illegal that is an American citizen has the same rights to any job that he or she is qualified for as you or I.

  • Anonymous

    In the days of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruin and the kingdom itself will not be passed on to any other people;he will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms and it itself will stand to time indefinite. Daniel 2 : 44 so do not worry, your time is very very limited. Matthew 24 : 14

    • Anonymous

      God Botherer

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Domingo-Arong/1294475381 Domingo Arong

    Rep. King should copy the words used in the original Naturalization Act of 1790 so that the opening line of the clause would now convey his true hidden intentions:

    “All free white persons born or naturalized in the United States …”

    • Anonymous

      That would help. It would reduce crime, poverty and increase our test scores.

      • Anonymous

        Racist

    • Anonymous

      This is ignorant. It doesn’t matter what race or nationality they are. The fact that over 20MM illegals are sucking the life out of our social systems is what matters.

  • Anonymous

    He is so not conservative. A real conservative will not deny the American born babies citizenship, but take them from their illegal parents and give them legal American guardians and throw the illegal immigrant parents out and deny them access to their American children until they go through the hassle of becoming legal citizens.

  • Anonymous

    THE ARTICLE IS A LIE..THE PARENTS OR PARENT OF THE ANCHOR BABY USES HIS LEGALLY APPLIED FOR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO SECURE FOOD STAMPS WELFARE HOUSING VOUCHERS FREE MEDICAL ETC ETC. AND THE PARENTS OR PARENT STAY AND WORK IN JOBS STOLEN FROM AMERICANS USING THEIR FAKE OR STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY CARD WHICH CAN BE PURCHASES ANYWHERE ON THE STREET FOR 50 TO 100 DOLLARS AND MOST EMPLOYERS DONT BOTHER TO CHECK TO SEE IF ITS A GOOD NUMBER BECAUSE THEY WELCOME THE CHEAP LABOR, THE WHOLE THING IS A SCAM ENABLED BY UNCLE SCAM AND THE WASHINGTON TRAITORS.

  • Anonymous

    Until we can control our borders this makes sense. We also need to end any jurisdiction in the US allowing non citizens the vote.

    • Anonymous

      Ahhhh, a non citizen can’t vote, because they are not a citizen. Did you take civic’s in junior high?

    • Anonymous

      What a maroon and the 9 people that “Liked” that comment as well. Non-citizens don’t vote.

      • Anonymous
        • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

          Thanks for posting this; I wasn’t aware there was any effort to allow illegal immigrants the right to vote in school board elections, so they could have more input into their (legal citizen) child’s education. I’ve learned something today.I’m not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, the illegal immigrants are, by definition, criminals… and the punishment is deportation. So why are they able to vote at all?On the other hand, the children are legal citizens of the United States. What, then, is in the best interest of that American child? Shall we separate the parent from the child, deporting the parent and making the child a ward of the state? Shall we deport American children until they are adults?So we have separate problems: 1. What to do with the parents/children already in this situation; and 2. How do we prevent this situation from arising in the future?For 1, I don’t know how disenfranchised the illegal parents are. Is it really going to make that much of a difference if they are allowed to vote? I suspect that in some communities there are A LOT of illegal parents with legal children in the schools… maybe a majority. That is a lot of disenfranchisement and the community should decide for themselves what they want to do. I don’t see why the federal or state government should prevent the communities from deciding for themselves.2. Prevention: this depends on what you already believe. If you think our immigration policies are allowing too many illegal immigrants to come into America, I suppose you would want to rescind the 14th amendment so the children would be illegal too. But I think our immigration policies are too severe. I want to make it far, far, easier for these immigrant parents to become legal. The only difference between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants is an arbitrary number that some bureaucrats in Washington have decided should be “legal.” Why not raise that arbitrary number by 20 million and let all the immigrants in legally?

  • Anonymous

    The sooner, the better !

  • Anonymous

    Repealing the part of 14th amendment that gives any baby born on U.S. Soil is the first and most important step in stopping the invasion. Write to your senators and house rep. And demand this action be taken now.

  • Guest

    I am a home health nurse in texas, and all I can say is that I see day by day by day the fraudulent abuses committed by Illegal aliens. From selling food stamps, from renting their kids social security numbers for tax claims, from hiding income from social services to get their rent paid, medicaid, food stamps. Obtain id’s to work illegally and last but not least just having babies they can’t afford without even giving it a second thought. Why should they have to the government hands out money, right? Schools in the cities are so overpopulated that so many kids have to study in trailers, and we pay high taxes for those kids to go to school. Why are we even paying for that. A report came out this week that only 50% of Hispanic children even graduate for HS. So what are we doing here? If we didn’t have the anchor baby law, I believe people would think about having children indiscriminately and expect the tax payers to pay for them. If we didn’t have anchor babies, maybe, just maybe we wouldn’t have invaders claiming things that they are not owed. My parents were immigrants, LEGALLY, through hardship, and they love this country not for what they thought they could suck out of this great nation; but the opportunity that was given to them to provided a better life to their kids. New immigrants are not that thankful and they just look to see what they can get out of this country. I hope this bill makes it through all the way!

    • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

      You can look at the same facts in reverse. The immigrants are hiding income, selling food stamps, etc BECAUSE they are treated as criminals (“illegal immigrants”). If we gave them a practical path to legality then they too would pay taxes and come out from the shadows.

      These people ARE ALREADY HERE. If we continue to act as if they aren’t, or that we don’t need to incorporate them into our society because they are “illegal”, we will continue to push them into a permanent underclass. Is that what America is about?

      Unless you or King or anybody addresses the reality that the immigrants are here already and there is no practical way to find and deport them, then we must — MUST — develop policies that allow them and/or their children to become full citizens. King’s policies are exactly the opposite of where America should be going.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KBP2YETWTPAJGEDGL4AJIUYJNE Big

        Why do you put illegal in quotes? Is there something about unlawful entry into the United States that you don’t understand? If you can’t even understand the most fundamental part of this, then anything else you have to say on the matter is irrelevant.

        • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

          I put “illegal immigrants” in quotes instead of using I.E. If the quotation marks offend you, then simply ignore them. Does this mean you have no objection to my main points, only to my punctuation?

  • Anonymous

    Go Steve Go!! I will do all possible to help you make this become a reality. The Commie Democrat Hispanics think this is a right that they are entitled to. Who the hell decided the 14th Amendment applied to the illegals ? This needs to become reality now. No more anchor babies. No more illegals.

    • Anonymous

      Go Steve Go!! I will do all possible to help you make this become a reality. The Commie Democrat brown ni&&ers think this is a right that they are entitled to. Who the hell decided the 14th Amendment applied to the brown ni&&ers ? This needs to become reality now. No more brown ni&&ers babies. No more brown ni&&ers.

      There now everyone knows exactly what you meant to say.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6G7SCCHDV645DUNIX2KDVDO32I William

    ‘In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.’

    Theodore Roosevelt 1907

    Enough said.

    • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

      Hmmm…. nothing there about illegal immigrants. In fact, before the late 19th century there were NO laws banning immigrants. We in the US have gone back and forth on illegal immigration since 1907 — sometimes wanting any immigrant (braceros, mainly) for their cheap labor, sometimes wanting deportation to eliminate competition with “real Americans.”

      If we want “American, and nothing but an American” then we should improve the path for immigrants to become American. Starting with a more realistic immigration policy that faces the facts: millions of immigrants have come here illegally, despite our existing laws and despite the hardships they face every day.

      Deporting them all is not a realistic solution.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6G7SCCHDV645DUNIX2KDVDO32I William

        Deportation IS a realistic solution it has been done before and has been successful. They come here and the majority have no allegiance to this country. They demand we accept and assimilate their culture when it is we who should demand that they assimilate to us.

        This Country has become so divided because we have lost our sense of identity and a Country’s identity is defined by its language, culture and borders.

        It is apparent that you and I disagree on this topic but you need to ask yourself a question I asked of myself long ago. Are we the dream that is the proverbial melting pot or have we become a bowl of salad?

        • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

          We are, and have always been, a bowl of salad. Our diversity is part of our strength. America is dedicated to the proposition that all are created equal. Not “made equal once they get here and act like the majority already does”, but already equal, made so by their creator.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HQWIKYSYL5TONCCU767UWZ3GT4 Coog30

        Love that idea, egc. Except it doesn’t at all address the fact that few illegal immigrants want anything to do with identifying themselves as Americans. Even the children of illegal aliens, born in America and are by current law Americans, choose to identify themselves as another nationality first. Article I wrote on the subject can be found here:
        http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/05/poor_old_glory.html

        • http://www.eddiecaplan.com/ egc52556

          “few illegal immigrants want anything to do with identifying themselves as Americans” What???? This isn’t a fact; this is a belief. I challenge you to produce statistical evidence to back up this claim.Second, what does it mean to be “American”? That the people must Ignore their ethnic heritage? Does that mean the Irish who celebrate St. Patrick’s Day in Boston (including a parade) every year aren’t “American”? Or is that OK because they are of European descent?Third, your Poor Old Glory article distorts what the issue at the high school was really about. The issue was that Mexican-American students were celebrating Cinco De Mayo with displays of Mexico’s flag. Non-Mexican-American punks wore American flag clothing to insult the Mexican-Americans and “prove” they (the non-MAs) are “real” Americans. Then when they are called on it, they act shocked — shocked! — that their little stunt would be interpreted as it was. And then had the gall to hide behind “patriotism”. Their message was loud and clear: Latinos are not “real” Americans.This is all just plain old-fashioned bigotry.The world is made up of many different people and America isn’t immune. Americans have always met new waves of “different” immigrants with hostility: Catholics, Jews, Asians, Latinos, Muslims. Blacks didn’t even have the privilege of coming here voluntarily; Americans hated them from afar and forced them to come here so they could be treated with hostility more conveniently. (OK, my rhetoric is getting away from me. Sorry.)Steve King and his ilk are unable to see that America isn’t just White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Heterosexual non-RINO Republicans. To them anything “different” is a threat and UnAmerican. This attitude cannot survive in an increasingly-heterogenous America and in a world decreasingly dominated by America.

Switch to our mobile site