Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Culver opposes federal plan to define birth control as abortion

By Lynda Waddington | 08.13.08 | 2:08 pm
Chet Culver

Chet Culver

Iowa Gov. Chet Culver today voiced his displeasure with President George W. Bush’s proposed rule change that would redefine birth control as abortion.

“Redefining certain forms of birth control as abortion is an unreasonable interpretation of basic contraception and family planning,” Culver said. “Over 98 percent of all American women will use contraceptives at some point in their lives. Assuring access to safe, affordable and reliable forms of family planning is sound public policy.”

In a letter sent Aug. 6 to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt, Culver called for a block of the proposed Bush Administration rule change.

… Thirty-four states, including Iowa, have enacted laws and policies that would be jeopardized due to the proposed definitional change. These state-based legal protections ensure women’s access to: birth control, including contraceptive equity in insurance, emergency contraception for sexual assault victims in the emergency room, and birth control at the pharmacy.

As Governor of the State of Iowa, I am very concerned with the federal government’s efforts to impose upon our state’s rights. This attempt at overturning legitimately-enacted laws focused on increasing access to basic health care and family planning is wrong. I strongly urge you not to proceed with this rule change and to prevent its formal introduction.

Iowa is among 27 states that have laws or policies that require insurance providers that cover prescriptions to provide coverage of the full range of FDA-approved contraceptive drugs and devices.

The proposed regulation change defines abortion as “any of the various procedures — including prescription, dispensing, and administration of any drug or the performance of any procedure or any other action — that results in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation.” The definition could be interpreted to sweep in birth control, including emergency contraception, intrauterine devices (IUDs) and other forms of hormonal contraceptives. This expanded definition is to be applied based on the providers’ beliefs and could allow any provider who wants to deny women birth control pills to claim protection based on a personal belief that such pills fit the regulatory definition of abortion. Up to 34 states, including Iowa, would be subject to changes in existing law.

Culver joins a growing coalition of Iowa elected officials who are opposed to this new rule. Federal office holders Tom Harkin, Leonard Boswell, Bruce Braley and Dave Loebsack, all Democrats, have all voiced their opposition to the proposed rule change based on the impact it could create for women in Iowa and across the nation.

“Without consulting doctors or relying on sound science, the Bush Administration is deciding to change the definition of birth control for all Americans,” said Jill June, chief executive officer and president of Planned Parenthood of Greater Iowa. “It’s ludicrous, and people in Iowa and across the country will not buy it.”

Follow Lynda Waddington on Twitter


Comments

  • daddysteve

    States rights? What a novel concept. I can remember a recent presidential candidate expressing these sentiments and it didn’t seem to go over so well in Iowa. I guess these ideas are just naive and quaint until they affect someone directly. BTW- how long has the Iowa Independent been around because I’m from Davenpit and I’ve never heard of it. Of course I don’t get around much.

  • daddysteve

    States rights? What a novel concept. I can remember a recent presidential candidate expressing these sentiments and it didn't seem to go over so well in Iowa. I guess these ideas are just naive and quaint until they affect someone directly. BTW- how long has the Iowa Independent been around because I'm from Davenpit and I've never heard of it. Of course I don't get around much.

  • rtia friest

    Thank you!!!!! I believe women and their Drs. are very capable of making decisions pertaining to womens health care. This would set women and basic human rights back years if Bush were able to pass this.

  • rtia friest

    Thank you!!!!! I believe women and their Drs. are very capable of making decisions pertaining to womens health care. This would set women and basic human rights back years if Bush were able to pass this.

  • Diane E.

    I question Bush’s right to do this without stepping in a legal mess. Of course, this back-channel behind the scenes surprise governance is a tactic that he has used repeatedly to get what he wants. Example – His lawyers find language in the Constitution that may be open to interpretation. Then they come up with a specious legal argument to support extraordinary rights of the Executive branch to do anything. Bush then uses this argument as cover to enact whatever agenda he favors (such as using torture). Those who disagree with his right then must fight the legality in Congress and/or deal with protracted court proceedings. In the meantime, Bush gets his way. If Bush does get this through, I would insist that my state representatives fight back HARD. It’s time for Congress to immediately enact legislation to protect us from overreaching executives attempting to make changes to rules or definitions that infringe on legislative prerogatives pertaining to this or any other subject. This is not an authoritarian government and one man’s view of what the “rules” should be on ANY subject must not take precedence over the peoples’ consent. America must be better than that.

  • Diane E.

    I question Bush's right to do this without stepping in a legal mess. Of course, this back-channel behind the scenes surprise governance is a tactic that he has used repeatedly to get what he wants. Example – His lawyers find language in the Constitution that may be open to interpretation. Then they come up with a specious legal argument to support extraordinary rights of the Executive branch to do anything. Bush then uses this argument as cover to enact whatever agenda he favors (such as using torture). Those who disagree with his right then must fight the legality in Congress and/or deal with protracted court proceedings. In the meantime, Bush gets his way. If Bush does get this through, I would insist that my state representatives fight back HARD. It's time for Congress to immediately enact legislation to protect us from overreaching executives attempting to make changes to rules or definitions that infringe on legislative prerogatives pertaining to this or any other subject. This is not an authoritarian government and one man's view of what the “rules” should be on ANY subject must not take precedence over the peoples' consent. America must be better than that.

Switch to our mobile site