Comments on: Leach for VP?

By: Alexjr

Alexjr — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 06:21:38 +0000

Obama our president!!

By: Alexjr

Alexjr — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:21:38 +0000

Obama our president!!

By: geezer

geezer — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:12:15 +0000

While respect Leach for standing his ground against Bush and Co. how about Caroline Kennedy?

By: Steel Medic

Steel Medic — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:28:07 +0000

I think Obama has really gotten many Republcians onto his side because he represents a new way of thinking. In ways he really reminds me of Ronald Regan. This election will be decided by “Obama Republicans”.

By: Steel Medic

Steel Medic — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:28:07 +0000

By: B W

B W — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:19:35 +0000

No, both parties are not indistinguishable. The neo-cons have destroyed the Republican Party with their anti-gay, anti-abortion, pro-war, and borrow-and-spend policies but they continue to pursue their reckless agenda of domestic neglect. The idea that you can ignore infrastructure needs and always cut taxes has run its course. Americans aren't buying it any longer.
-
The Democrats are trying to bring some pragmatism back to the process. If we don't want a Minneapolis-style bridge collapse, then we have to pay for inspections and repairs or replacements. We should also be paying with short term bonds so don't mortgage our children's future.
-
'Divide and conquer' or 'pragmatic and pay-as-you-go'. Which would you rather be?

By: B W

B W — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:19:35 +0000

No, both parties are not indistinguishable. The neo-cons have destroyed the Republican Party with their anti-gay, anti-abortion, pro-war, and borrow-and-spend policies but they continue to pursue their reckless agenda of domestic neglect. The idea that you can ignore infrastructure needs and always cut taxes has run its course. Americans aren’t buying it any longer.
-
The Democrats are trying to bring some pragmatism back to the process. If we don’t want a Minneapolis-style bridge collapse, then we have to pay for inspections and repairs or replacements. We should also be paying with short term bonds so don’t mortgage our children’s future.
-
‘Divide and conquer’ or ‘pragmatic and pay-as-you-go’. Which would you rather be?

By: Susan

Susan — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:59:14 +0000

I would love for McCain to pick that sanctimonious, duplicitous, dishonest weasel. The Democrats hate him, the Republicans don’t like him much, (which is how the Democrats felt about him in 2000), and he would be constantly telling McCain what to do in front of the cameras, making McCain look like he needs a minder. Plus there’s that face, which seems far more sensitive to gravity than most basset hounds. Yeah, that would really be the ticket that screams change you can believe in.

By: Susan

Susan — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:59:14 +0000

I would love for McCain to pick that sanctimonious, duplicitous, dishonest weasel. The Democrats hate him, the Republicans don't like him much, (which is how the Democrats felt about him in 2000), and he would be constantly telling McCain what to do in front of the cameras, making McCain look like he needs a minder. Plus there's that face, which seems far more sensitive to gravity than most basset hounds. Yeah, that would really be the ticket that screams change you can believe in.

By: daddysteve

daddysteve — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:20:27 +0000

“Rising above partisanship”? More like both parties are indistinguishable in philosophy and action.