Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Nader files for Iowa ballot

By John Deeth | 08.07.08 | 5:03 pm

Ralph Nader’s campaign has gathered twice the required signatures and filed for a place on the Iowa ballot Friday. Democrats are still seething at Nader over his “spoiler” role in Florida in 2000, but a look at election returns show that he has not made the difference in Iowa between Democrats and Republicans in his three previous races.

Nader campaign)

Ralph Nader (Source: Nader campaign)

The Nader campaign submitted 3,000 signatures to the Iowa Secretary of State’s office, twice the required 1,500. In 2004 Nader’s petitions were challenged in many states, including Iowa. “Any challenge would be doomed to failure,” said Scott Knight of the Iowa Nader campaign.

The campaign had planned to file on Thursday and hold a morning news conference, but a delay in a FedEx package carrying documents with Nader’s signature led to the rescheduling.

As the Green Party nominee, Nader drew 0.5 percent of the Iowa vote in 1996, when Bill Clinton easily beat Bob Dole. But despite the widespread spoiler argument (are you listening, Leonard Boswell?), Nader’s 29,374 Iowa votes as a Green in 2000 weren’t enough to keep Democrat Al Gore from winning Iowa by 4,000 votes.

Further undercutting the spoiler argument, Nader’s percentage in 2004 collapsed to 0.4 percent, yet Iowa flipped from blue to red. Nader’s 5,973 votes were less than George Bush’s 10,000 vote margin over John Kerry.

Nader ran in Iowa as an independent candidate in 2004, and some of his 2000 support shifted to Green nominee David Cobb. This year, the competition for the Nader niche may be fiercer, as the Greens have nominated a higher profile candidate, former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney.

A four-way national Associated Press-Ipsos Poll released Tuesday showed Nader at 3 percent and Libertarian Bob Barr with 2 percent. McKinney was not included in the survey, which had Democrat Barack Obama ahead of Republican John McCain, 47 percent to 41 percent.

Nader filed in Iowa as the “Peace and Freedom Party” candidate. That ballot label has been used for 40 years as a catch-all left party in California, dating back to the 1968 Eldridge Cleaver campaign. In other states, Nader is running as an independent or as the candidate of the “Independent Party.”

“Our chances in the fall really depend on our ability to get into the debates,” Knight told Iowa Independent. “If Nader is allowed in the debates the sky is the limit on how well we could do in November.” Only two third party candidates have participated in fall debates. Ross Perot debated Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush in 1992. John Anderson debated Ronald Reagan in 1980, but Jimmy Carter boycotted the debate.

“If Nader is not in the debates, then we are hoping to get the Peace and Freedom Party permanent ballot status in Iowa,” said Knight. That would require Nader to reach 2 percent in Iowa, the level he reached in 2000.

Nader joins Gloria LaRiva of the Party for Socialism and Liberation on the Iowa ballot. The filing deadline is August 15.

Comments

  • Nigel T. Gully

    Wonderful work, Iowa Nader/Gonzalez team! Congrats on your victory! I’m very glad that more people will have their American rights bolstered by being able to vote for more than two candidates.

    I still do not understand this “spoiler” concept that some people latch onto. If you think about it, either we’re all spoilers, taking votes away from each other as competitors, or none of us are spoilers (again, we’re competitors). To label someone as a spoiler is something of political bigotry. If someone is working hard to bring about the change they want to see in their beloved country, all while doing it fairly with the American ideal of democracy in mind, why would you demonize them for trying to serve you so passionately and sincerely? Nader, for example, has served the entire U.S. population for decades with such landmark legislation as the Clean Water Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and laws protecting the safety of coal miners. Take a moment to ask yourself, amidst the wanning Obama craze, what on earth Barack has done that deserves any kind of great merit?

    I think Ralph has some great ideas, such as aggressively pursuing solar energy for a sustainable energy source. I think everybody wins with this stance: the leftists get clean, green, renewable energy while the conservatives get a brand new industry which demands well educated workers and, in turn, creates tons of new jobs. The U.S. would finally get that huge “math & science” education kick-start that has, up until now, been tepid and, sadly, keeping us behind in the global marketplace against the likes of Asia and Europe. There’s no doubt we can compete, given our vast amount of raw skills. Plus, with the green energy, we avoid health problems for the public (which affects EVERYONE–rich, poor, middle class) caused by pollution.

    If you’re looking for the same old, same old, then check out Obama or McCain. But, if you’re looking for the “Experience” & “Hope” hybrid, then look no further than Nader. After all, why support a candidate who doesn’t support you?

    Nader/Gonzalez ’08

    http://www.VoteNader.org

    Best,
    Nigel

  • Nigel T. Gully

    Wonderful work, Iowa Nader/Gonzalez team! Congrats on your victory! I'm very glad that more people will have their American rights bolstered by being able to vote for more than two candidates.

    I still do not understand this “spoiler” concept that some people latch onto. If you think about it, either we're all spoilers, taking votes away from each other as competitors, or none of us are spoilers (again, we're competitors). To label someone as a spoiler is something of political bigotry. If someone is working hard to bring about the change they want to see in their beloved country, all while doing it fairly with the American ideal of democracy in mind, why would you demonize them for trying to serve you so passionately and sincerely? Nader, for example, has served the entire U.S. population for decades with such landmark legislation as the Clean Water Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and laws protecting the safety of coal miners. Take a moment to ask yourself, amidst the wanning Obama craze, what on earth Barack has done that deserves any kind of great merit?

    I think Ralph has some great ideas, such as aggressively pursuing solar energy for a sustainable energy source. I think everybody wins with this stance: the leftists get clean, green, renewable energy while the conservatives get a brand new industry which demands well educated workers and, in turn, creates tons of new jobs. The U.S. would finally get that huge “math & science” education kick-start that has, up until now, been tepid and, sadly, keeping us behind in the global marketplace against the likes of Asia and Europe. There's no doubt we can compete, given our vast amount of raw skills. Plus, with the green energy, we avoid health problems for the public (which affects EVERYONE–rich, poor, middle class) caused by pollution.

    If you're looking for the same old, same old, then check out Obama or McCain. But, if you're looking for the “Experience” & “Hope” hybrid, then look no further than Nader. After all, why support a candidate who doesn't support you?

    Nader/Gonzalez '08

    http://www.VoteNader.org

    Best,
    Nigel

  • Gary Rabetoy

    Nigel,

    You are absolutely correct. Compared to Ralph Nader, the two major party candidates put together have not even come close to the service provided for the American people. Similarly, Ralph Nader offers a strategy with real solutions, not meaningless slogans about change when all we have seen for many years now is just more of the same. Anyone who wants to know more about Ralph Nader should get a copy of the video “An Unreasonable Man” and watch it. If one is looking for a competent, intelligent person with real integrity, one needs to look no further. Furthermore, if one thinks that the USA is a model of democracy, excluding someone like Ralph Nader from debating in a nationally televised debate should make one think otherwise.

    Best wishes,

    Gary Rabetoy

  • Gary Rabetoy

    Nigel,

    You are absolutely correct. Compared to Ralph Nader, the two major party candidates put together have not even come close to the service provided for the American people. Similarly, Ralph Nader offers a strategy with real solutions, not meaningless slogans about change when all we have seen for many years now is just more of the same. Anyone who wants to know more about Ralph Nader should get a copy of the video “An Unreasonable Man” and watch it. If one is looking for a competent, intelligent person with real integrity, one needs to look no further. Furthermore, if one thinks that the USA is a model of democracy, excluding someone like Ralph Nader from debating in a nationally televised debate should make one think otherwise.

    Best wishes,

    Gary Rabetoy

Categories & Tags: Elections/Campaigns| |

Switch to our mobile site