Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Researchers: Ag producers have more to gain than lose in climate legislation

By Lynda Waddington | 12.23.09 | 3:51 pm

Researchers at Kansas State University have scrutinized recently released studies on the impact of climate change legislation for agriculture producers and came to the conclusion that most, but not all, producers will benefit from the package passed earlier this year by the U.S. House of Representatives.

The seven-member KSU team was lead by Bill Golden, an agriculture economist, and provided an analysis and comparison of earlier studies completed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Duke University, Texas A&M, the University of Tennessee, and the University of Missouri.

“We were approached by the American Farmland Trust [to do this comparative study],” Golden explained on KSU radio. “There are several studies out there that appear to conflict with one another, and our charge as a group was to approach the studies from an extension-type standpoint — look at the studies and try to relate [the findings] as if we were talking to an extension-type audience in Kansas.”

The group concluded that each study they reviewed suggested that there would be a small cost increase with the implementation of the Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, as passed by the U.S. House, and that consumers would be most likely to bear the brunt of that increase. But the studies offered different opinions on the prospects of revenue — specifically if revenues would be enough to offset the potential cost increases.

“The bottom line for production agriculture is that there looks like there will be a very small net cash revenue differences with or without the program,” Golden said. “Of course, that is assuming that there are provisions put in the bill so that we are not faced with an unlevel playing field with our foreign neighbors. … If our agricultural producers are faced with costs that our competitors are not faced with, it will definitely put us at a cost disadvantage.”

One of the most confusing aspects of the proposed legislation for producers is the creation of a carbon market where different entities could trade credits. For instance, a utility that produced an excess of adverse environmental impacts could purchase credits from producers or other environmental benefiting entities through the this market as a part of a “cap-and-trade” policy.

The studies released so far, according to Golden, have not provide a clear picture as to exactly what impact such a system would have on agriculture.

“Each study made different assumptions,” he said. “They each used a different list of possible offsets. They each used different prices for carbon. And, they each used different net receipts from carbon offsets to the producers. All of which are very important to determine just how much better off agriculture may be. Nobody really knows, which is why we see such a big difference in the assumptions among these studies.”

Some of the studies assume that producers will be reimbursed for converting to no-till, others assume that there would be carbon credits passed on to producers for growing bioenergy crops, converting cropland to pastureland or trees (aforestation), reducing field emissions of nitrous oxide and methane, or sequestering pastureland. Depending on the assumption taken in the specific study, the legislation is viewed as being more favorable to either crop or livestock producers, as it relates to land use.

“One of the things that we have to remember, and we stated this in our study — and I certainly hope that we didn’t offend any of the authors of the other studies — when you start predicting out 60, 70 or 80 years, the confidence interval around those predictions is pretty large,” Golden said.

“In our study we pretty well focused on the short run. We said that we believe that will really determine which way the impacts go. It isn’t that the land use is not a big issue, it’s simply that you have a very difficult time today predicting how individual producers are going to react over the next 80 or 90 years and, specifically, you really have a hard time understanding and predicting what type of technologies will come about in the next 100 years. We can look at examples, like the ethanol industry, that have just occurred over the past decade.”

The consensus of the Kansas State University group is that overall per-acre profitability may decrease slightly in the short-run, but longer term outlooks are more beneficial. That being said, Golden is quick to point out that while their overall conclusion might be good, it should not be taken to mean that all regional-specific and commodity-specific producers will fare equally well.

The economic impacts will vary regionally and by crop and livestock sub-sector. The impacts will depend on cultural and management practices and the farm-specific ability to sequester carbon and receive offset income. While on the national level agriculture appears to be positively affected, on a farm level some sub-sectors, such as rice production, appear to be worse off.

Overall, the research suggests U.S. agriculture has more to gain that lose with the passage of H.R. 2454. The bill specifically exempts production agriculture from emission caps, provides provisions to ease the transition to higher fertilizer prices and fosters the development of carbon offset markets which likely will enhance agricultural revenues.

“While on average agriculture might be better off,” he said, “not everybody will be.”

The full report from Golden and the KSU research team is available online.

Follow Lynda Waddington on Twitter


  • apowerleveling

    Cool heart, and shot on the mercy Dragonica Gold of, Ling Po crazy way to EVE Isk kill, he began to love the taste of blood, like to see these cowardly FFXI GIL monsters in front of him like the poor, like the thrill of the muscles across the Bing Ren … …

  • apowerleveling

    He entered the 49th floor, the Lineage 2 Adena iron front of the room was familiar. The middle of the Last Chaos Gold room there is an old man sitting there, is close their eyes meditatively. It Knight Online Gold seemed that the advent of Ivy Ling Po do not know.

  • apowerleveling

    Ivy Ling Po stood there quietly, he Flyff Penya has felt the old man out of a strong body radiates a gas, he stared at the old man: “When I first arrived someone asked EQ2 Gold me to defeat the forty-nine-story monster, now left This last layer of the, no one thought was a powerful human masters, could I then, he 2Moons Dil takes a fight? “Ivy Ling Po Zi Cun,” Although I experienced 48 times the fighting, but also learn many new moves can be With my present strength, but also far behind him, it appears was a World War II had.

  • lvinn

    Cheng Wen ffxi gil Yan startled c9 online gold Meixi stood up, took wow gold one look at the Tashang runescape gold Tears of Bangladesh knight online gold will be on him said: “Bangladesh will, you metin2 yang take a good eve isk rest here, I have to go maple story mesos out a long journey, you can maple story mesos do in the Plum Court temporarily recuperate . “

Switch to our mobile site