<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election Verification Funding &#8216;Redundant,&#8217; Says Latham Spokesman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowaindependent.com/2218/election-verification-funding-redundant-says-latham-spokesman/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2218/election-verification-funding-redundant-says-latham-spokesman</link>
	<description>Iowa politics, news, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:46:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2218/election-verification-funding-redundant-says-latham-spokesman/comment-page-1#comment-11385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/2218/election-verification-funding-redundant-says-latham-spokesman#comment-11385</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Latham misleads us again&lt;/strong&gt; The bill he opposes could have helped Iowa.&#160; But Democrats control Iowa, so maybe he doesn&#039;t want to help anymore.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bill is not redundent.&#160; It offers states a solution to problems that HAVA created.&#160; It is typical &quot;clean up&quot; legislation, that fixes errors of the original HAVA or advances HAVA in specific ways.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no billion dollar surplus that we can draw on.&#160; Some states (NY) have not yet spent their original money from HAVA, but we can&#039;t get that money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Latham has never been engaged on this issue and still seems to be ignorant after all these years.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Latham misleads us again</strong> The bill he opposes could have helped Iowa.&nbsp; But Democrats control Iowa, so maybe he doesn&#39;t want to help anymore.
<p>The bill is not redundent.&nbsp; It offers states a solution to problems that HAVA created.&nbsp; It is typical &#8220;clean up&#8221; legislation, that fixes errors of the original HAVA or advances HAVA in specific ways.</p>
<p>There is no billion dollar surplus that we can draw on.&nbsp; Some states (NY) have not yet spent their original money from HAVA, but we can&#39;t get that money.</p>
<p>Latham has never been engaged on this issue and still seems to be ignorant after all these years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/2218/election-verification-funding-redundant-says-latham-spokesman/comment-page-1#comment-5404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/2218/election-verification-funding-redundant-says-latham-spokesman#comment-5404</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Latham misleads us again&lt;/strong&gt; The bill he opposes could have helped Iowa.&#160; But Democrats control Iowa, so maybe he doesn&#039;t want to help anymore.&lt;p&gt;
The bill is not redundent.&#160; It offers states a solution to problems that HAVA created.&#160; It is typical &quot;clean up&quot; legislation, that fixes errors of the original HAVA or advances HAVA in specific ways.&lt;p&gt;
There is no billion dollar surplus that we can draw on.&#160; Some states (NY) have not yet spent their original money from HAVA, but we can&#039;t get that money.&lt;p&gt;
Latham has never been engaged on this issue and still seems to be ignorant after all these years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Latham misleads us again</strong> The bill he opposes could have helped Iowa.&nbsp; But Democrats control Iowa, so maybe he doesn&#8217;t want to help anymore.
<p>
The bill is not redundent.&nbsp; It offers states a solution to problems that HAVA created.&nbsp; It is typical &#8220;clean up&#8221; legislation, that fixes errors of the original HAVA or advances HAVA in specific ways.</p>
<p>
There is no billion dollar surplus that we can draw on.&nbsp; Some states (NY) have not yet spent their original money from HAVA, but we can&#8217;t get that money.</p>
<p>
Latham has never been engaged on this issue and still seems to be ignorant after all these years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
