Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Election Verification Funding ‘Redundant,’ Says Latham Spokesman

By Lynda Waddington | 04.17.08 | 9:05 am

A spokesman in Congressman Tom Latham’s office says the lawmaker voted against incentives for election verification because the bill would be a “costly redundant federal program.”

The Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008 (HR 5036) encourages states to conduct verifiable elections by converting to a paper ballot system, offering emergency paper ballots, and conducting hand-counted audits. Two weeks ago, the legislation passed the House Administration Committee with unanimous and bipartisan support.

“Congressman Latham believes it is important to ensure the integrity and accuracy of our nation’s election process,” said spokesman Fritz Chaleff. “To accomplish this, he also supports the concept of providing voters with verification of their ballot choices. To that end, he applauds the State of Iowa for already addressing this by enacting legislation on April 1, which provides uniform voting technology to all 99 counties in the state that will make available voter-marked paper ballots that could be recounted by hand if necessary.”

The state legislation that Chaleff cites requires Iowa’s county auditors to replace existing touchscreen voting machines with systems that use a paper ballot. The federal legislation that Latham and Congressman Steve King — Iowa’s two Republican Congressmen — voted against this week would have provided reimbursement to the state for the cost of replacing the touchscreens.

“This bill would represent a real step forward in our effort to protect the accuracy, integrity and security of the November elections,” said Rep. Rush Holt, a New Jersey Democrat and one of the bill sponsors. “The bill that the House leadership scheduled for a vote today is the same one that passed two weeks ago without the objection of a single committee member. There is no reason why this should be a partisan issue, but the Republicans evidently have chose to make it so. The White House issued a statement opposing the bill and 176 of 203 Republicans voted that way.”

Chaleff contends the objection to the proposed legislation centered around cost and redundancy.

“Congressman Latham also believes in the importance of protecting Iowa taxpayers’ wallets from costly, redundant federal programs,” Chaleff said. “HR 5036 creates a new federal program that is redundant with an already existing law — the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), which was signed into law in 2002. Among other reforms, HAVA set minimum requirements for voting systems used in federal elections, created a new federal agency to assist in the administration of federal elections, and authorized billions of dollars in election-related grants to states to upgrade their voting systems. To date, approximately $3 billion in federal grants have already been provided to states to upgrade their voting systems. And, the fund still contains more than $1 billion in unspent funds, which remain available to states. Creating a new and redundant federal program at an additional cost to taxpayers of over a half a billion dollars (CBO scoring sets the bill

Follow Lynda Waddington on Twitter


Comments

  • Jerry

    Latham misleads us again The bill he opposes could have helped Iowa.  But Democrats control Iowa, so maybe he doesn’t want to help anymore.

    The bill is not redundent.  It offers states a solution to problems that HAVA created.  It is typical “clean up” legislation, that fixes errors of the original HAVA or advances HAVA in specific ways.

    There is no billion dollar surplus that we can draw on.  Some states (NY) have not yet spent their original money from HAVA, but we can’t get that money.

    Latham has never been engaged on this issue and still seems to be ignorant after all these years.

  • Jerry

    Latham misleads us again The bill he opposes could have helped Iowa.  But Democrats control Iowa, so maybe he doesn't want to help anymore.

    The bill is not redundent.  It offers states a solution to problems that HAVA created.  It is typical “clean up” legislation, that fixes errors of the original HAVA or advances HAVA in specific ways.

    There is no billion dollar surplus that we can draw on.  Some states (NY) have not yet spent their original money from HAVA, but we can't get that money.

    Latham has never been engaged on this issue and still seems to be ignorant after all these years.

Switch to our mobile site