<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The night&#8217;s biggest number: Democratic turnout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout</link>
	<description>Iowa politics, news, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:05:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: desmoinesdem</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout/comment-page-1#comment-12423</link>
		<dc:creator>desmoinesdem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout#comment-12423</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;even more amazing statistic&lt;/strong&gt; More Iowans attended their precinct caucus than voted in the 2006 gubernatorial primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>even more amazing statistic</strong> More Iowans attended their precinct caucus than voted in the 2006 gubernatorial primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desmoinesdem</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout/comment-page-1#comment-12424</link>
		<dc:creator>desmoinesdem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout#comment-12424</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;the turnout was phenomenal&lt;/strong&gt; I was predicting a small increase to 140,000. I thought the DMR poll was outlandish to suggest 60 percent of caucus-goers would be first-timers. This was one comment I wrote at the time:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;ve contacted just about all of the 175 people who showed up to caucus in my precinct in 2004. Of course, a few had died or moved away since then. A few more won&#039;t be able to attend this year because they&#039;ll be out of town or whatever. But there are also people who didn&#039;t attend in 2004 for flukey reasons (foot surgery, out of town), who normally go to the caucuses and will be there this year.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would say that at least 140 to 150 of the people who attended our caucus in 2004 will be there on Thursday night.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we are to believe the DMR, 60 percent of caucus-goers will be first-timers. That means that either a lot of regulars are lying when they say they&#039;ll show up, or the total turnout will shatter the record. We&#039;d have to have over 300 people in the room to have 60 percent of the caucus-goers be there for the first time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;And that would suggest a statewide turnout of way more than 150,000.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not buying it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;We had 293 people in my precinct caucus on Thursday night. I still can&#039;t believe it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>the turnout was phenomenal</strong> I was predicting a small increase to 140,000. I thought the DMR poll was outlandish to suggest 60 percent of caucus-goers would be first-timers. This was one comment I wrote at the time:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#39;ve contacted just about all of the 175 people who showed up to caucus in my precinct in 2004. Of course, a few had died or moved away since then. A few more won&#39;t be able to attend this year because they&#39;ll be out of town or whatever. But there are also people who didn&#39;t attend in 2004 for flukey reasons (foot surgery, out of town), who normally go to the caucuses and will be there this year.
<p>I would say that at least 140 to 150 of the people who attended our caucus in 2004 will be there on Thursday night.</p>
<p>If we are to believe the DMR, 60 percent of caucus-goers will be first-timers. That means that either a lot of regulars are lying when they say they&#39;ll show up, or the total turnout will shatter the record. We&#39;d have to have over 300 people in the room to have 60 percent of the caucus-goers be there for the first time.</p>
<p>And that would suggest a statewide turnout of way more than 150,000.</p>
<p>I am not buying it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We had 293 people in my precinct caucus on Thursday night. I still can&#39;t believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout/comment-page-1#comment-12425</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 03:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout#comment-12425</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama for president&lt;/strong&gt; Obama for president&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;If he can win in Iowa and do well in New Hampshire with Independent support, Obama will have earned the opportunity for a final appeal to Democrats. As he does so, he will undoubtedly tout his then-proven ability to attract Independents and attract new voters into the process. That is why Clinton&#039;s status as frontrunner will be more vulnerable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carlos Men&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama for president</strong> Obama for president
<p>If he can win in Iowa and do well in New Hampshire with Independent support, Obama will have earned the opportunity for a final appeal to Democrats. As he does so, he will undoubtedly tout his then-proven ability to attract Independents and attract new voters into the process. That is why Clinton&#39;s status as frontrunner will be more vulnerable.</p>
<p>Carlos Men</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout/comment-page-1#comment-5107</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout#comment-5107</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama for president&lt;/strong&gt; Obama for president&lt;p&gt;
If he can win in Iowa and do well in New Hampshire with Independent support, Obama will have earned the opportunity for a final appeal to Democrats. As he does so, he will undoubtedly tout his then-proven ability to attract Independents and attract new voters into the process. That is why Clinton&#039;s status as frontrunner will be more vulnerable.&lt;p&gt;
Carlos Men</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama for president</strong> Obama for president
<p>
If he can win in Iowa and do well in New Hampshire with Independent support, Obama will have earned the opportunity for a final appeal to Democrats. As he does so, he will undoubtedly tout his then-proven ability to attract Independents and attract new voters into the process. That is why Clinton&#8217;s status as frontrunner will be more vulnerable.</p>
<p>
Carlos Men</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desmoinesdem</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout/comment-page-1#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator>desmoinesdem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout#comment-5108</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;the turnout was phenomenal&lt;/strong&gt; I was predicting a small increase to 140,000. I thought the DMR poll was outlandish to suggest 60 percent of caucus-goers would be first-timers. This was one comment I wrote at the time:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;ve contacted just about all of the 175 people who showed up to caucus in my precinct in 2004. Of course, a few had died or moved away since then. A few more won&#039;t be able to attend this year because they&#039;ll be out of town or whatever. But there are also people who didn&#039;t attend in 2004 for flukey reasons (foot surgery, out of town), who normally go to the caucuses and will be there this year.&lt;p&gt;
I would say that at least 140 to 150 of the people who attended our caucus in 2004 will be there on Thursday night.&lt;p&gt;
If we are to believe the DMR, 60 percent of caucus-goers will be first-timers. That means that either a lot of regulars are lying when they say they&#039;ll show up, or the total turnout will shatter the record. We&#039;d have to have over 300 people in the room to have 60 percent of the caucus-goers be there for the first time.&lt;p&gt;
And that would suggest a statewide turnout of way more than 150,000.&lt;p&gt;
I am not buying it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
We had 293 people in my precinct caucus on Thursday night. I still can&#039;t believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>the turnout was phenomenal</strong> I was predicting a small increase to 140,000. I thought the DMR poll was outlandish to suggest 60 percent of caucus-goers would be first-timers. This was one comment I wrote at the time:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve contacted just about all of the 175 people who showed up to caucus in my precinct in 2004. Of course, a few had died or moved away since then. A few more won&#8217;t be able to attend this year because they&#8217;ll be out of town or whatever. But there are also people who didn&#8217;t attend in 2004 for flukey reasons (foot surgery, out of town), who normally go to the caucuses and will be there this year.
<p>
I would say that at least 140 to 150 of the people who attended our caucus in 2004 will be there on Thursday night.</p>
<p>
If we are to believe the DMR, 60 percent of caucus-goers will be first-timers. That means that either a lot of regulars are lying when they say they&#8217;ll show up, or the total turnout will shatter the record. We&#8217;d have to have over 300 people in the room to have 60 percent of the caucus-goers be there for the first time.</p>
<p>
And that would suggest a statewide turnout of way more than 150,000.</p>
<p>
I am not buying it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
We had 293 people in my precinct caucus on Thursday night. I still can&#8217;t believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: desmoinesdem</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout/comment-page-1#comment-5109</link>
		<dc:creator>desmoinesdem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/1793/the-nights-biggest-number-democratic-turnout#comment-5109</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;even more amazing statistic&lt;/strong&gt; More Iowans attended their precinct caucus than voted in the 2006 gubernatorial primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>even more amazing statistic</strong> More Iowans attended their precinct caucus than voted in the 2006 gubernatorial primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
