Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Obama-Richardson Deal Goes Both Ways in Certain Precincts and Counties

By admin | 01.03.08 | 3:49 pm

[Exclusive] It seems that the under-the-radar caucus night dealmaking first reported by Iowa Independent last night may be even more complicated than once thought, according to additional reports from sources on the ground across the state.

Two well-placed sources told Iowa Independent last night that Gov. Bill Richardson’s campaign plans to direct their supporters to Sen. Barack Obama in precincts where their candidate does not reach the 15% threshold for viability.

Today, more sources have come forward to tell Iowa Independent that some supporters of Sen. Barack Obama have been directed to swing delegates to Gov. Bill Richardson in certain counties and precincts.  Sources confirm that in at least three counties, Obama campaign field organizers have told their supporters to drive support to Richardson. The three confirmed counties are all likely Obama strongholds, and each county will assign a relatively high number of delegates tonight.  We have decided not to list the counties by name to protect sources’ anonymity.

Obama activists in certain other counties denied receiving instructions for Richardson-Obama vote-swapping.  We have heard similar rumors about precinct-specific deals between Obama and Sen. Joe Biden, although we have been unable to confirm them.

As more reports come in, we will continue to update this post with new information.  That said, the deal is likely to manifest itself in ways that will be difficult to detect, even after the caucuses are over.  So what exactly happens in the 1,784 precinct caucuses across the state may be difficult to explain for some time.

The Richardson campaign continues to deny our reports.

If you know anything please email us tips, anonymity assured.

Comments

  • IAGUY

    That was how things worked out in Iowa City Biden and Richardson were about half of viability for a delegate and so things moved on to obama in quantity.

  • ic_gardener

    True in Iowa City In my Iowa City precinct, the local Obama campaign official said there was a deal between Richardson and Obama, and that since Richardson was not viable in our precinct, his supporters would come to Obama.  The stated purpose was to take an extra delegate from Clinton, thus keeping Clinton’s numbers down.  My impression was that they did not want Clinton to get good numbers, which would keep the race going and allow Richardson to stay in the race a while longer.

    The one concession asked from the Obama camp was that the Richardson people would be allowed to choose the delegates for the convention, which all of the Obama group was okay with.

  • SALGAL21

    NO DEALS I was a precinct captain for Richardson. Three days before the caucus an Obama volunteer called my home to invite me to an event. I said I was supporting Richardson. The Obama volunteer told me my co-precinct captain had said he would support Obama if Richardson were not viable. That did not square with information I had. I called him and he said he heard that was the position of the campaign (Richardson). I personally checked with campaign headquarters and found out that it was not true. There were no deals. Richardson supporters were not urged to go with Obama.  Yet when I was registering participants, one told me she was going from Richardson to Obama because Richardson was swinging his support to Obama. She said she heard it on NPR. I called the campaign headquarters again and was again informed that was no such deal. I later heard again — when the re-alignment process was going on — that an Obama supporter had stated that he believed that Richardson supporters were to go to Obama.  The bottom line is that the sources for such a claim — as far as my own personal experience is concerned emanated from those who where Obama supporters. I also spoker with Biden supporters who had been informed by Obama people that Biden was sending his supporters to Biden — again not true. We did the best we could to get the truth to the Richardson and Biden supporters that there were no such deals. I am aware that of some that went to Obama on the erroneous belief that such a deal had been made. I wonder how many others were influenced to go to Obama based on misinformation and where that misinformation was initiated. Richardson and Biden had nothing to win from such a strategy.

  • wptv5tv

    Obama/Richardson deal I just heard the Richardson caucus goers at a high school in Des Moines announce on C-Span that they were going to Obama in the second round of voting, so it appears your exclusive was correct. Congratulations!

  • Maria

    How interesting Chase, many thanks for keeping us up to date here in upstate, Ny. Very eagerly awaiting results!

  • eyewitness

    grassroots devolution to precinct captains From the NY Times:
    http://thecaucus.blo…

    QUOTE
    David Plouffe, Obama campaign manager, responding to the report that Mr. Obama had reached an agreement for reciprocal support with Bill Richardson’s campaign, insisted the campaign had reached “no formal arrangements” with any of his rivals. But he said that “there are certainly places where our precinct captains want to work with Richardson” supporters – to gain second-choice support in cases where Mr. Richardson doesn’t reach the threshold to compete, or to lend Mr. Richardson surplus backers in instances where they can’t yield any additional Obama delegates.

    “We’re giving our precinct captains a lot of latitude to work this out,” Mr. Plouffe said. “We’re going to fight as hard as we can for every one” of Mr. Richardson’s available supporters, and “It comes down to how well our precinct captains do.”
    ENDQUOTE

  • Maria

    How interesting Chase, many thanks for keeping us up to date here in upstate, Ny. Very eagerly awaiting results!

  • eyewitness

    grassroots devolution to precinct captains From the NY Times:

    http://thecaucus.blo…

    QUOTE

    David Plouffe, Obama campaign manager, responding to the report that Mr. Obama had reached an agreement for reciprocal support with Bill Richardson's campaign, insisted the campaign had reached “no formal arrangements” with any of his rivals. But he said that “there are certainly places where our precinct captains want to work with Richardson” supporters – to gain second-choice support in cases where Mr. Richardson doesn't reach the threshold to compete, or to lend Mr. Richardson surplus backers in instances where they can't yield any additional Obama delegates.

    “We're giving our precinct captains a lot of latitude to work this out,” Mr. Plouffe said. “We're going to fight as hard as we can for every one” of Mr. Richardson's available supporters, and “It comes down to how well our precinct captains do.”

    ENDQUOTE

  • wptv5tv

    Obama/Richardson deal I just heard the Richardson caucus goers at a high school in Des Moines announce on C-Span that they were going to Obama in the second round of voting, so it appears your exclusive was correct. Congratulations!

  • PJL

    ITS A RUMOR, THATS ALL! It just not true!  Richardson supporters at our caucus did not go to Obama, necessarily. Some went to Clinton, some to Edwards, some to Obama. Neither, Richardson, Biden or Kucinich were viable at our caucus. And even though Kucinich told his supporters to go to Obama, at our caucus only half went to Obama.

    Edwards benefitted the most on second alignment. He was barely liable on first alignment.

  • IAGUY

    That was how things worked out in Iowa City Biden and Richardson were about half of viability for a delegate and so things moved on to obama in quantity.

  • mikejonesdsm

    DSM I actually ended up caucusing for Richardson instead of Obama to take an extra delegate away from the Hillary folks.  It was an organized effort.  The Obama precinct captains were really on the ball.

  • ic_gardener

    True in Iowa City In my Iowa City precinct, the local Obama campaign official said there was a deal between Richardson and Obama, and that since Richardson was not viable in our precinct, his supporters would come to Obama.  The stated purpose was to take an extra delegate from Clinton, thus keeping Clinton's numbers down.  My impression was that they did not want Clinton to get good numbers, which would keep the race going and allow Richardson to stay in the race a while longer.

    The one concession asked from the Obama camp was that the Richardson people would be allowed to choose the delegates for the convention, which all of the Obama group was okay with.

  • SALGAL21

    NO DEALS I was a precinct captain for Richardson. Three days before the caucus an Obama volunteer called my home to invite me to an event. I said I was supporting Richardson. The Obama volunteer told me my co-precinct captain had said he would support Obama if Richardson were not viable. That did not square with information I had. I called him and he said he heard that was the position of the campaign (Richardson). I personally checked with campaign headquarters and found out that it was not true. There were no deals. Richardson supporters were not urged to go with Obama.  Yet when I was registering participants, one told me she was going from Richardson to Obama because Richardson was swinging his support to Obama. She said she heard it on NPR. I called the campaign headquarters again and was again informed that was no such deal. I later heard again — when the re-alignment process was going on — that an Obama supporter had stated that he believed that Richardson supporters were to go to Obama.  The bottom line is that the sources for such a claim — as far as my own personal experience is concerned emanated from those who where Obama supporters. I also spoker with Biden supporters who had been informed by Obama people that Biden was sending his supporters to Biden — again not true. We did the best we could to get the truth to the Richardson and Biden supporters that there were no such deals. I am aware that of some that went to Obama on the erroneous belief that such a deal had been made. I wonder how many others were influenced to go to Obama based on misinformation and where that misinformation was initiated. Richardson and Biden had nothing to win from such a strategy.

  • RichardsonSupporter

    No deal, seconded I second the above. I was likewise a Richardson precinct captain. The first I heard of a “deal” was from the Obama captain during realignment: “What about the deal? Richardson told all of you guys to come over to us. Kuchinich did that, too.” I replied that I'd read about the Kuchinich deal, but had heard nothing about Obama. I asked at the Richardson office after the caucus, and they said there was never any such deal.

    My suspicion is that the rumor was intentionally planted by the Obama campaign. I wonder if part of his strategy on Thursday night was to derail Richardson, and try to ensure that it was not a four-way race in New Hampshire. As I understand it, our strategy was to gain viability and at least one delegate in as many precincts as possible, and that we were in good shape, given anticipated turnout. But with the large number of brand new “democrats” that the Obama camp turned out, the viability threshhold was higher, and in most places, we didn't make it.

    Having a better idea of their likely turnout, the Obama people might have started the rumor to quash efforts by the Richardson groups to pick up enough supporters to become viable. I have heard and read of a number of places where it worked out that way, and the Richardson people mostly went over to Obama.

    On the subject of the high turnout, I would estimate that nearly half of the total Obama count in our precinct were new registrations. As people arrived, I was helping with the new voter registration, and virtually all of them headed straight for the Obama corner. Many had pre-printed registration forms, all filled out except for the signature.

    In our precinct, had there been a genuine deal, the Obama people could have easily “given” us enough people to be viable without affecting their delegate count: the effect would have been to prevent Edwards (also non-viable, but with a larger group than we had for Richardson) from getting a delegate. But despite their captain's talk of a “deal,” so far as he was concerned it was strictly a one-way deal: Richardson supporters going to Obama.

  • mikejonesdsm

    DSM I actually ended up caucusing for Richardson instead of Obama to take an extra delegate away from the Hillary folks.  It was an organized effort.  The Obama precinct captains were really on the ball.

  • RichardsonSupporter

    No deal, seconded I second the above. I was likewise a Richardson precinct captain. The first I heard of a “deal” was from the Obama captain during realignment: “What about the deal? Richardson told all of you guys to come over to us. Kuchinich did that, too.” I replied that I’d read about the Kuchinich deal, but had heard nothing about Obama. I asked at the Richardson office after the caucus, and they said there was never any such deal.

    My suspicion is that the rumor was intentionally planted by the Obama campaign. I wonder if part of his strategy on Thursday night was to derail Richardson, and try to ensure that it was not a four-way race in New Hampshire. As I understand it, our strategy was to gain viability and at least one delegate in as many precincts as possible, and that we were in good shape, given anticipated turnout. But with the large number of brand new “democrats” that the Obama camp turned out, the viability threshhold was higher, and in most places, we didn’t make it.

    Having a better idea of their likely turnout, the Obama people might have started the rumor to quash efforts by the Richardson groups to pick up enough supporters to become viable. I have heard and read of a number of places where it worked out that way, and the Richardson people mostly went over to Obama.

    On the subject of the high turnout, I would estimate that nearly half of the total Obama count in our precinct were new registrations. As people arrived, I was helping with the new voter registration, and virtually all of them headed straight for the Obama corner. Many had pre-printed registration forms, all filled out except for the signature.

    In our precinct, had there been a genuine deal, the Obama people could have easily “given” us enough people to be viable without affecting their delegate count: the effect would have been to prevent Edwards (also non-viable, but with a larger group than we had for Richardson) from getting a delegate. But despite their captain’s talk of a “deal,” so far as he was concerned it was strictly a one-way deal: Richardson supporters going to Obama.

  • PJL

    ITS A RUMOR, THATS ALL! It just not true!  Richardson supporters at our caucus did not go to Obama, necessarily. Some went to Clinton, some to Edwards, some to Obama. Neither, Richardson, Biden or Kucinich were viable at our caucus. And even though Kucinich told his supporters to go to Obama, at our caucus only half went to Obama.

    Edwards benefitted the most on second alignment. He was barely liable on first alignment.

Categories & Tags: | | |

Switch to our mobile site