Obama, McCain Lead Newspaper Endorsements

ONLY ONE? How can you say Obama was the only one (AND YOU TALK OF BILL CLINTON LYING) against the war.  Ron Paul has been more consistently against the war than any candidate including Obama.  Also, you cry for someone who is going to make a difference and a change.  Consider the only one the rest of the world is saying would be an ideal President of The United States of America AND IS A LOT MORE EXPERIENCED, AND A LOT MORE MATURE THAN ANY CANDIDATE

CONSIDER RON PAUL

Obama is the best choice The Des Moines Register chickened out.  Hillary is totally flawed.  She says her "experience" that makes her a better choice than Obama is her time as First Lady, but she won't release her records as First Lady in time for the Primaries.  Her major experiences are all negative and show she doesn't learn: 1. the admitted health care debacle in the early 90s from which America is still reeling, 2. voting to empower Bush to rush to war against Iraq, and 3. siding with Bush again in voting that Iran's military are terrorists.  The last example is the most troubling for it was only a few months ago that she went along with Bush's proposal to vote Iran's military to be terrorists, technically an act of war.  A few weeks after her vote, we learned that a National Intelligence Estimate showed that Iran stopped its nuclear weapons development in 2003 and probably hasn't resume it since.  She was suckered again.  And she proved she learns nothing from experience. 

Her husband desperately trying to rebrand her a "change agent" a few weeks ago doesn't make her that, and in the same breadth Bill bragged about how he opposed the Iraq war from the start (another flat out lie).

America needs a change.  A politician who is honest with good judgment.  Obama is that person.  He was against the war in Iraq from the start even though it was unpopular.  He was the only one.  And Obama, unlike Hillary, didn't vote for Bush's most recent bill against Iran either.  Obama can unite America.  Hillary can't.  We can't afford to risk continuing the Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton cycle.  It's not working anymore.  The world has changed and so must America.

It might be nice to look at if there is any correlation in past elections P.S.  Any correlation between endorsements and winners in the past?

Nice job of updating the feature to include total circulation Keep at it John