Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.
A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.
The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.
BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.
CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.
TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.
DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.
Romney Would Open Oil Drilling in Alaskan Wilderness
Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney gave a presentation in Muscatine on Thursday that included a video display with graphs, statistics and bullet points. His event was billed as a talk on his “Strategy for a Stronger America: Strengthening America’s Economy.” He talked and explained slides that gave statistical projections on subjects including taxes, immigration and U.S. oil dependence.
During a question-and-answer period, one man from the audience asked about drilling for oil in domestic territories, particularly in Alaska.
Romney said he thinks drilling in “Alaska is the easiest, the people of the state want us to drill there and the nation wants to drill there. Let’s do it. But in this case the Democrats are listening to extreme environmentalists that say no.”
During his answer Romney said 60 percent of U.S. oil is imported. The Energy Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy has predicted that imported oil will rise to 70 percent by 2025.
Romney went on to talk about energy from nuclear power and how the U.S. is “beholden to people like Putin, Ahmadinejad and Chavez,” referring to the current leaders of Russia, Iran and Venezuela.
Sorry to burst your bubble The truth of the matter is Alaskans DO want oil exploration to continue and as to the caribou and other critters they know as well as any person living here, the state is huge and most folks have trouble just conceptualizing the land area involved. We also make sure the developers think about the environment when they build and operate. You may think the place is crowded with wildlife but there are a lot of areas where you would have a hard time finding them. Most of it is where they want to drill.
I agree that most Alaskans want to drill there, the reality is that it wouldn’t last very long at current U.S. consumption rates.
David
Romney can stop stagflation We’ve seen in the news today (December 14th) that stagflation, a stagnating economy plus high inflation due largely to high fuel costs, is a real possibility in the near future. Romney understands that we HAVE to develop new sources of fuel to mean increasing demand. That is the only way to decrease the price of fuel and prevent the inflation caused by higher fuel costs.
Plus Romney understands that developing our own fuel sources will free us of Venezuela, Iran, and Russia. That’s critical to our national security.
David
Romney can stop stagflation We've seen in the news today (December 14th) that stagflation, a stagnating economy plus high inflation due largely to high fuel costs, is a real possibility in the near future. Romney understands that we HAVE to develop new sources of fuel to mean increasing demand. That is the only way to decrease the price of fuel and prevent the inflation caused by higher fuel costs.
Plus Romney understands that developing our own fuel sources will free us of Venezuela, Iran, and Russia. That's critical to our national security.
Anonymous
I think its time to … stop talking about oil independence.
Factcheck.org has some figures on what it would take to become energy independent, including this one from 2004 in an article titled:
“Kerry and Bush Mislead Voters With Promises of Energy Independence”
from the article: “Bush supports expanded drilling in Alaska to increase domestic oil supply, but the US has only about 3 percent of the world's oil reserves. At current rates of consumption that would only last 4.5 years.”
So that was 4 years ago…
if we had drained all our oil reserves at the time the statements were made, we'd have about a half a year until that was gone
(according to BP's Statistical Review of World Energy).
Sorry to burst your bubble The truth of the matter is Alaskans DO want oil exploration to continue and as to the caribou and other critters they know as well as any person living here, the state is huge and most folks have trouble just conceptualizing the land area involved. We also make sure the developers think about the environment when they build and operate. You may think the place is crowded with wildlife but there are a lot of areas where you would have a hard time finding them. Most of it is where they want to drill.
Anonymous
You didn't burst nothin' my post was about the actual supply of oil in Alaska.
We have only 3% of the world's supply.
I said nothing about the wildlife or open spaces.
My post was more about people's statements that conclude that if we opened Alaskan drilling, all our oil needs would be met.
It doesn't appear to be that way. Try again and thanks for playing.
I agree that most Alaskans want to drill there, the reality is that it wouldn't last very long at current U.S. consumption rates.
JEAN
THESE HEAVY CONSUMERS MUST MAKE UP THEIR MINDS WHICH WAY THEY WANT THINGS TO HAPPEN. EITHER THEY STOP USING SO MUCH OF THE PRODUCT, OR ALLOW DRILLING IN ALASKA. WHICH IS IT?
JEAN
THESE HEAVY CONSUMERS MUST MAKE UP THEIR MINDS WHICH WAY THEY WANT THINGS TO HAPPEN. EITHER THEY STOP USING SO MUCH OF THE PRODUCT, OR ALLOW DRILLING IN ALASKA. WHICH IS IT?
Anonymous
You didn’t burst nothin’ my post was about the actual supply of oil in Alaska.
We have only 3% of the world’s supply.
I said nothing about the wildlife or open spaces.
My post was more about people’s statements that conclude that if we opened Alaskan drilling, all our oil needs would be met.
It doesn’t appear to be that way. Try again and thanks for playing.
Anonymous
I think its time to … stop talking about oil independence.
Factcheck.org has some figures on what it would take to become energy independent, including this one from 2004 in an article titled:
“Kerry and Bush Mislead Voters With Promises of Energy Independence”
from the article: “Bush supports expanded drilling in Alaska to increase domestic oil supply, but the US has only about 3 percent of the world’s oil reserves. At current rates of consumption that would only last 4.5 years.”
So that was 4 years ago…
if we had drained all our oil reserves at the time the statements were made, we’d have about a half a year until that was gone
(according to BP’s Statistical Review of World Energy).