Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Specter speech breathes new life into card check bill

By Jason Hancock | 06.08.09 | 11:27 am

Speaking at a labor rally this weekend, Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter voiced support for the Employee Free Choice Act, a turn of events that could revive the hopes of a bill many felt was doomed.

The legislation, which is sponsored by Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, makes it easier for labor unions to organize. Iowa Republican Sen. Charles Grassley said his party would filibuster the bill, which led Harkin to predict it would have to be altered to have any chance of passing.

Specter, who once supported the measure (and even sponsored it), came out in opposition to it in March. Most believe the about-face was due to a strong challenge in the Republican primary. Since that time, however, Specter has become a Democrat. U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak, a retired Navy Admiral, has publicly expressed an interest in challenging him in the 2010 Democratic primary, pressuring Specter from the left.

Specter’s speech this weekend in Pittsburgh appears to signal another change in opinion that could give the Democrats the votes needed to overcome a filibuster and make Harkin’s bill a reality.

“If you want to be elected in this state, you have to come to labor,” he said. “I know that. I owe my re-election in part to the endorsement the AFL-CIO has given me in the past.”

Specter was then interrupted by a man in the crowd who declared “you want my vote, I want yours,” referencing Specter’s position on the bill.

“I understand your job’s on the line,” Specter said. “I think you’ll be satisfied with my vote on this issue.”

The contentious portion of the bill involves language that would allow unions to be certified by the National Labor Relations Board if a majority of workers sign cards designating the union as their bargaining representative. It would not do away with secret ballots for union organizing, but they would no longer be required. Union activists and anti-labor groups both agree that the change would make it easier for unions organize.

Opponents say that without a secret ballot, workers will be intimidated into joining a union. Supporters of the bill counter that employees already face intimidation from their employer when contemplating a union vote. Under the current law employers can veto workers’ decision to organize through majority signup and force them into the election process where, according to a recent study, a pro-union worker is illegally fired in a quarter of all organizing drives.

Follow Jason Hancock on Twitter


Comments

  • TheGnomeOfPittsburgh

    The secret ballot is more important than getting re-elected, Arlen.
    Where are your principles? Shame on you if you support this bill.

  • Hogarth

    “according to a recent study”

    Oh, well, OK then. No further evidence required. Your job, Mr. Journalist, is done.

    Me? I'm going to check the link…

    “By 2007, pro-union workers involved in union election campaigns faced about a 1.8 percent chance of being illegally fired during the course of the campaign. If we assume…”

    Ah, we can assume. Normally we could just stop reading right there. Or, alternatively, we can look at the only hard data provided and stipulate that there is, in fact, a 1.8 percent chance of being illegally fired.

    If we really wanted to have some fun, we could then determine the odds of the employer being driven out of business by the resulting unionization, thus causing the loss of oh, say, 100% of the jobs.

    In the contemporaneous case of the employer being a car manufacturer, I guess we could assume those odds to be something in the neighborhood of 66% in favor of a bankruptcy, or worse, a gov't takeover. This assumes, of course, that Ford can survive it's own union-related problems.

  • Hogarth

    “according to a recent study”

    Oh, well, OK then. No further evidence required. Your job, Mr. Journalist, is done.

    Me? I'm going to check the link…

    “By 2007, pro-union workers involved in union election campaigns faced about a 1.8 percent chance of being illegally fired during the course of the campaign. If we assume…”

    Ah, we can assume. Normally we could just stop reading right there. Or, alternatively, we can look at the only hard data provided and stipulate that there is, in fact, a 1.8 percent chance of being illegally fired.

    If we really wanted to have some fun, we could then determine the odds of the employer being driven out of business by the resulting unionization, thus causing the loss of oh, say, 100% of the jobs.

    In the contemporaneous case of the employer being a car manufacturer, I guess we could assume those odds to be something in the neighborhood of 66% in favor of a bankruptcy, or worse, a gov't takeover. This assumes, of course, that Ford can survive it's own union-related problems.

  • Hogarth

    “according to a recent study”

    Oh, well, OK then. No further evidence required. Your job, Mr. Journalist, is done.

    Me? I'm going to check the link…

    “By 2007, pro-union workers involved in union election campaigns faced about a 1.8 percent chance of being illegally fired during the course of the campaign. If we assume…”

    Ah, we can assume. Normally we could just stop reading right there. Or, alternatively, we can look at the only hard data provided and stipulate that there is, in fact, a 1.8 percent chance of being illegally fired.

    If we really wanted to have some fun, we could then determine the odds of the employer being driven out of business by the resulting unionization, thus causing the loss of oh, say, 100% of the jobs.

    In the contemporaneous case of the employer being a car manufacturer, I guess we could assume those odds to be something in the neighborhood of 66% in favor of a bankruptcy, or worse, a gov't takeover. This assumes, of course, that Ford can survive it's own union-related problems.

Switch to our mobile site