Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Study finds big economic boost for Mass. after same-sex marriage

By Jason Hancock | 05.18.09 | 11:12 am

A new study by the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law has found that Massachusetts legalizing same-sex marriage in 2004 has resulted in $111 million being pumped into the state’s economy.

The group also found that young, highly educated people in same-sex relationships were 2.5 times more likely to move to Massachusetts now that same-sex marriage is legal.

In April, the same organization found that Iowa’s economy stood to gain even more than northeastern states that have legalized same-sex marriage since Iowa has no nearby competitors for same-sex couples who want to marry. The group found that Iowa businesses could see $160 million in new wedding and tourism spending over the next three years, totaling an extra $5.3 million per year in tax revenue.

Follow Jason Hancock on Twitter


Comments

  • slincoln

    Social conservatives will ignore their fiscal conservatism in this matter. But it is ironic – liberty providing more money to the economy? and they are opposed to it?

  • alsachti

    Excerpts from the study :
    - 12,167 same-sex couples living in Massachussetts were married.
    - Same-sex couple spent an average of $7,400 on their wedding.
    - If all same-sex couples spent this amount, weddings by same-sex couples gave the economy a $90 million boost (12,167 * 7,400 = 90 million)

    Hahem… I'm sorry for the Williams Institute, but economy is a little bit more complex.
    The fact that a couple spent money for a wedding does not mean that they would not have spent this money if they had not tied the knot.
    If same-sex marriage was not legal, same-sex couples could have spent their money differently (a commitment ceremony, a new car…)

    The aim of the Williams Institute doesn't seem to be to “advance critical thougth” (as their motto claims) but to advance a political agenda.
    Another evidence of that is the title of their study : “The Business Boost from Marriage Equality”. An objective scientist wouldn't have used a subjective, political expression like “marriage equality” but a more neutral expression like “same-sex marriage”.

  • alsachti

    Excerpts from the study :
    - 12,167 same-sex couples living in Massachussetts were married.
    - Same-sex couple spent an average of $7,400 on their wedding.
    - If all same-sex couples spent this amount, weddings by same-sex couples gave the economy a $90 million boost (12,167 * 7,400 = 90 million)
    (http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/pdf/B…)

    Hahem… I'm sorry for the Williams Institute, but economy is a little bit more complex.
    The fact that a couple spent money for a wedding does not mean that they would not have spent this money if they had not tied the knot.
    If same-sex marriage was not legal, same-sex couples could have spent their money differently (a commitment ceremony, a new car…)

    The aim of the Williams Institute doesn't seem to be to “advance critical thougth” (as their motto claims) but to advance a political agenda.
    Another evidence of that is the title of their study : “The Business Boost from Marriage Equality”. An objective scientist wouldn't have used a subjective, political expression like “marriage equality” but a more neutral expression like “same-sex marriage”.

  • alsachti

    Excerpts from the study :
    - 12,167 same-sex couples living in Massachussetts were married.
    - Same-sex couple spent an average of $7,400 on their wedding.
    - If all same-sex couples spent this amount, weddings by same-sex couples gave the economy a $90 million boost (12,167 * 7,400 = 90 million)
    (http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/pdf/B…)

    Hahem… I'm sorry for the Williams Institute, but economy is a little bit more complex.
    The fact that a couple spent money for a wedding does not mean that they would not have spent this money if they had not tied the knot.
    If same-sex marriage was not legal, same-sex couples could have spent their money differently (a commitment ceremony, a new car…)

    The aim of the Williams Institute doesn't seem to be to “advance critical thougth” (as their motto claims) but to advance a political agenda.
    Another evidence of that is the title of their study : “The Business Boost from Marriage Equality”. An objective scientist wouldn't have used a subjective, political expression like “marriage equality” but a more neutral expression like “same-sex marriage”.

Switch to our mobile site