Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Sex offender bill passes Senate unanimously, but could face GOP opposition in House

By Jason Hancock | 04.24.09 | 11:04 am

Iowa’s sex offender laws would no longer include residency restrictions, instead using exclusionary zones and better tracking of individuals convicted of sexual crimes, following a unanimous vote in the state Senate Thursday night.

Senate File 340 ends the law banning some sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or day care. The new law would create exclusionary zones where registered sex offenders would be prohibited from working or visiting without permission.

“This legislation is strongly supported by Iowa prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and victims’ rights groups,” said Sen. Keith Kreiman, D-Bloomfield, who managed the bill on the Senate floor. “It increases supervision of violent offenders, keeps sex offenders from hanging around schools and other places where children gather, and improves the safety of our communities.”

Despite the unanimous Senate support, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, D-Des Moines, said this morning that House Republicans informed him they were going to try to kill the measure. Republican Rep. Clel Baudler of Greenfield was assigned by McCarthy to floor manage the bill. House Minority Leader Kraig Paulsen, R-Hiawatha, could not immediately be reached for comment.

Convicted sex offenders would be prohibited from loitering within 300 feet of an elementary or secondary school; being at an elementary school or day care without permission; working at a school or childcare facility; or loitering within 300 feet of anyplace intended primarily for use by children, such as a playground or sports field. The bill would also allow ankle bracelets to be used to track convicted sex offenders in Iowa.

The “2,000-foot rule,” which passed in 2002 but didn’t go into effect until 2005, has been widely criticized by law enforcement officials as unworkable and failing to adequately protect the public from sexual predators.

Despite the overwhelming opinion that the law needed to be changed, legislators have long been hesitant, fearful political opponents could misconstrue their vote as weakening the bill when they ran for re-election. Those fears were realized when former state Rep. Ed Fallon, D-Des Moines, challenged fellow Democrat incumbent U.S. Rep. Leonard Boswell in the 2008 Third District primary. Fallon was the only “no” vote cast when the Iowa House originally passed the bill, and a few weeks before the primary, a 527 group sent our direct-mail fliers saying he was so soft on criminals he even thinks it’s OK for sex offenders to live near schools.

When the possibility of revising the law came up this year, legislators were eager ensure whatever came to a vote on the floor had broad bipartisan support. Lawmakers from both parties have held secret meetings for weeks crafting the bill passed last night.

The 2,000-foot rule would still apply to the state’s most dangerous sex offenders.

The Iowa House is expected to take up the bill Friday. Gov. Chet Culver has indicated he supports the changes.

Follow Jason Hancock on Twitter


Comments

  • TimPa

    I do not get it after 25 years in Law Enforcement and I still do not understand why these people that we elect refuse to listen to anyone. They need to pass this law and stop using the 2,000 ft rule. It makes no one safe to say a sex offender can not sleep within 2,000 ft of a school and yet they can hang around the school all day if they like. And come on the real facts on sex offenders from the US Dept. Of Justice show that sex offenders have one of the lowest recidivism rates amoung most criminals at a reconviction rate of 3.5% within three years of release from prison. Most criminals are in the 45% recidivism rates. And who is doing these sex crimes, again look to the studies; 90% of the victims know the accused very well with over 50% of them being a family member. 95% of those arrested for sexual assault have no prior arrest record. Those criminals released from prison for non sex crimes, when released commit in real numbers more sexual assaults then do released sex offenders. So maybe we need to have a Criminal Offender registry that list everyone ever arrested for anything on it, including those arrested for driving while Intoxicated. After all drunk drivers kill and injure more childern every year then do sex crimes. But sex crimes are so dam bad that is the reason we must watch those who are child molesters. But the word sex offender does not = child molester.

    • http://sites.google.com/site/firejanevalezmitchell/ HysteriaBGone

      Hear Hear!

  • National_Coalition

    I am so tired of listening to these nonsense articles and propaganda by prosecutors and law enforcement who claim that sexual abuse of children is epidemic. If a sexual offender is going to strike, NO LAW is going to prevent it. The only thing that WILL prevent sexual abuse against children is education and proper parental management. Parents are always looking for free babysitters; like the internet, video games, parks, school zones, etc, rather than keeping an eye on their own kids. Secondly, sexual assaults in school zones and “where children gather” rarely occur. You've all been listening to knuckleheads without a clue. Prosecutors and some law enforcement officials love to cause hysteria over hobglobins. The fact is that repeating a sexual offense is also considered a rarity. Check your facts people! The result of all this sex offender bashing is going to be the creation of an extremely dangerous sub culture of former criminals without hope. Politicians are exploiting this issue because they have no real solutions to the problems that are TRULY plaguing our society. This is all hobglobin nonsense. It sounds good, but is truly making things much worse. It won't happen over night, but beware, a Revolution is Calling!

  • HysteriaBGone

    This is a positive first step for Iowa. But this type of legislation should go further. According to the Department Of Justice and many university studies, less than 10% of sex offenders re-offend and most sexual abuse is committed by people known to the victim (i.e. a parent), not by strangers.
    The laws should change to reflect these facts!
    Right now, there are thousands of people listed on registries who have never committed rape or even attempted to. Public urination, public breast-feeding, voyeurism, streaking, teenagers exchanging nude photos of themselves on cellphones (aka “sexting”), and teenagers having consensual sex with other teenagers are all registrable offenses.
    In Maine, one Congresswoman (Dawn Hill) even wants to make staring at a minor for too long a sexual offense! These may be inappropriate activities, but certainly do not warrant decades of ostracizing on a sex offender registry.
    The registry obviously needs reform so that only legitimate predators will be listed on it. I see that Iowa is beginning to differentiate, but again, Iowa needs to go further. Low-risk offenders should never be blocked from taking their families to a park or picking up their kids from school. Children are more likely to be harmed by a meth-addict than someone who peed on a sign ten years ago!
    The only people who profit from these expensive feel-good laws are crooked politicians, not the common taxpayer. There is no evidence that residency restrictions prevent sexual abuse, and in fact, they may increase the danger from those who are truly dangerous since they encourage them to stop registering altogether. Therefore I support the abolishment of zoning laws.
    The original intent of Megan's Law was to monitor violent sex offenders only and that is what the laws should do now.

  • 1mother4all

    My son of almost 18 was put under the test of what he did wrong; in my feelings, the girls feelings and the parents of the young girl mentioned above, what he is punished for is wrong but the law took over. How many did she or he do before getting someone tossed in jail. That’s the real question? If consent is there, why punish someone. It takes two, and she and he wanted it why punish one?

    The people that should be convicted, are the ones who do it with out consent.

    He can not even see his baby and I have to leave my home and go someplace else so that I can be with his son, 15 months old baby, just so he has a place to be while we are together.

    The person he has as a probation officer does not even want to help him, after prison time was completed, she has made it difficult for him to get a job, LIMITS ON WHAT COUNTIES HE CAN GO IN, (only three counties, you know when you live in a small town that limits your ability to stand on your own.) AND THE FACT THAT SHE IS OVER 35 OR 50 MINS AWAY FOR HIM TO HAVE TO SEE HER EVERY TWO WEEKS with out a car and no money to get to and from, I bought him a car, but the darn thing broke down over the holiday and again today Tuesday May 26 and now I am without work because he had to go and see his probation officer and again he will have to go on Wed, and she could not even give him the chance to be with the family over the holiday but expects us to drop all that there is to make sure she and he meet, that is not helping the person who is being charged with the hideous crime but hindering the people that can help him make a new life. He is trying so hard to abide by her rules but yet she keeps pulling and pushing unlike his first probation officer that he had before we had to move to this county, so he would have a home. IF YOU HAVE ANY IDEA ON HOW TO STOP THE WRONG PEPOLE FROM BEING IN THIS TYPE OF BUSINESS LET ME KNOW. THOUGHT SHE WAS HERE TO HELP HIM MAKE A NEW LIFE, NOT TAKE OVER AND END HIS LIFE.

    It is very unfair that people like her/him can get away with this, they are to help the people out there, not make it impossible for them to regain a life in this world.

    m&s w/consent

  • sjfb1953

    I have a son who is being forced by the DOC to sign up on the sex offender registry even though a judge issued an order that he was Not to sign up. I think that it's all a political joke!! The worst offenders are the “officials” that push this type of legislation! They are deliberately and maliciously destroying lives and futures of people without consideration of the circumstances of the alleged crime.

  • sjfb1953

    I have a son who is being forced by the DOC to sign up on the sex offender registry even though a judge issued an order that he was Not to sign up. I think that it's all a political joke!! The worst offenders are the “officials” that push this type of legislation! They are deliberately and maliciously destroying lives and futures of people without consideration of the circumstances of the alleged crime.

  • sjfb1953

    I have a son who is being forced by the DOC to sign up on the sex offender registry even though a judge issued an order that he was Not to sign up. I think that it's all a political joke!! The worst offenders are the “officials” that push this type of legislation! They are deliberately and maliciously destroying lives and futures of people without consideration of the circumstances of the alleged crime.

Switch to our mobile site