<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Iowa ad praises Iowa Supreme Court decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowaindependent.com/14310/one-iowa-ad-praises-iowa-supreme-court-decision/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowaindependent.com/14310/one-iowa-ad-praises-iowa-supreme-court-decision</link>
	<description>Iowa politics, news, and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:46:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kentuckydan</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/14310/one-iowa-ad-praises-iowa-supreme-court-decision/comment-page-1#comment-19931</link>
		<dc:creator>kentuckydan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 13:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=14310#comment-19931</guid>
		<description>The statement that this will not change Religous marriage is not true to fact&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You cannot have Religous marriage without Civil marriage the next step to be expected is a law suit against some Religous institution for not performing a same sex marriage ceremony.,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that might not be too wise, should it happen,  expect a drive for an amendment to the State Constitution and expect it to have a fair amount of support,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it does not happen then I doubt that an Amendment would gather enough support.,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I don;t expect the temptation to take this issue to that final step to be resisted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statement that this will not change Religous marriage is not true to fact</p>
<p>You cannot have Religous marriage without Civil marriage the next step to be expected is a law suit against some Religous institution for not performing a same sex marriage ceremony.,</p>
<p>Now that might not be too wise, should it happen,  expect a drive for an amendment to the State Constitution and expect it to have a fair amount of support,</p>
<p>If it does not happen then I doubt that an Amendment would gather enough support.,</p>
<p>But I don;t expect the temptation to take this issue to that final step to be resisted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kentuckydan</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/14310/one-iowa-ad-praises-iowa-supreme-court-decision/comment-page-1#comment-16728</link>
		<dc:creator>kentuckydan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 11:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=14310#comment-16728</guid>
		<description>The statement that this will not change Religous marriage is not true to fact&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You cannot have Religous marriage without Civil marriage the next step to be expected is a law suit against some Religous institution for not performing a same sex marriage ceremony.,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that might not be too wise, should it happen,  expect a drive for an amendment to the State Constitution and expect it to have a fair amount of support,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it does not happen then I doubt that an Amendment would gather enough support.,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I don;t expect the temptation to take this issue to that final step to be resisted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statement that this will not change Religous marriage is not true to fact</p>
<p>You cannot have Religous marriage without Civil marriage the next step to be expected is a law suit against some Religous institution for not performing a same sex marriage ceremony.,</p>
<p>Now that might not be too wise, should it happen,  expect a drive for an amendment to the State Constitution and expect it to have a fair amount of support,</p>
<p>If it does not happen then I doubt that an Amendment would gather enough support.,</p>
<p>But I don;t expect the temptation to take this issue to that final step to be resisted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slincoln</title>
		<link>http://iowaindependent.com/14310/one-iowa-ad-praises-iowa-supreme-court-decision/comment-page-1#comment-16507</link>
		<dc:creator>slincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowaindependent.com/?p=14310#comment-16507</guid>
		<description>The term &quot;pro-same-sex marriage&quot; is a bit of a misnomer, since their main focus is marriage equality.  This means fighting for everyone&#039;s civil marriage rights, regardless of the religious beliefs of others.  The group is just fighting for people to have the right to chose to marry who they wish and not be bound by other people&#039;s beliefs in who that person should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;pro-same-sex marriage&#8221; is a bit of a misnomer, since their main focus is marriage equality.  This means fighting for everyone&#39;s civil marriage rights, regardless of the religious beliefs of others.  The group is just fighting for people to have the right to chose to marry who they wish and not be bound by other people&#39;s beliefs in who that person should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
