Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Rants’ move could constitute violation of oath of office

By Jason Hancock | 04.13.09 | 6:32 pm

Lawmakers who vote to attach a same-sex marriage ban to a tax reform bill would be violating their oath of office, according to Mark Kende, a constitutional law professor at Drake University.

Republican state Rep. Christopher Rants has filed an amendment to add language to a bill that would define marriage as between a man and a woman for tax code purposes. Such a provision would be unconstitutional, Kende said, because it essentially ignores the Supreme Court’s decision in Varnum v. Brien, which said the state’s laws cannot treat same-sex couples different from opposite-sex couples for the purposes of marriage. A constitutional amendment is the only legal way to overturn the court’s decision.

“Legislators take an oath to follow the law,” Kende said. “That applies even if one doesn’t like the ruling.”

The Iowa Constitution requires that anyone appointed or elected to public office take an oath “to support the constitution of the United States, and of this state.”  Both documents have been interpreted over the years to grant courts the right to review and, if necessary, strike laws that are considered “unconstitutional.”

This is the second time this month that Rants has tried to force debate on same-sex marriage. Last week, he failed at amending a Health and Humans Services budget to include an amendment to Iowa’s constitution banning same-sex marriage.

Debate is expected on the bill Tuesday or Wednesday.

Follow Jason Hancock on Twitter


Comments

  • http://caffeinatedthoughts.com Shane Vander Hart

    This guy's argument is asinine, so we can't amend the constitution because that would violate a ruling that determined something unconstitutional.

    So the Legislature can't find a remedy? Isn't this what the amendment process is for?

    • Sarahf

      You're not understanding what he's saying. Rants isn't trying to amend the constitution now. He's trying to say same-sex couples' marriages aren't recognized in Iowa's tax code by inserting language in a tax bill. The Republicans can amend the constitution if they want, but simply passing a law that contradicts the court's ruling is not legal.

      So this guy's argument is totally sound. Rants is just trying to make Democrats vote against marriage, and since he can't get an amendment up for debate he's doing this.

    • slincoln

      Sorry Shane, Sarah is right. This isnt about the amendment – rants knows he can't get it on the agenda this session, so he is frantically trying to find ways to strip certain marriage rights away from the gay/lesbian couples who were denied them since the redefinition of civil marriage in 1998.

  • john649

    this behavior is so reminiscent of the anti civil rights tactics by white people………….how disgusting this all is…………

  • slincoln

    Sorry Shane, Sarah is right. This isnt about the amendment – rants knows he can't get it on the agenda this session, so he is frantically trying to find ways to strip certain marriage rights away from the gay/lesbian couples who were denied them since the redefinition of civil marriage in 1998.

  • slincoln

    Sorry Shane, Sarah is right. This isnt about the amendment – rants knows he can't get it on the agenda this session, so he is frantically trying to find ways to strip certain marriage rights away from the gay/lesbian couples who were denied them since the redefinition of civil marriage in 1998.

Switch to our mobile site