Top Stories

Open letter to readers: Today and tomorrow

By Lynda Waddington | 11.17.11

Wednesday was a difficult day for The American Independent News Network, which is the larger entity that operates The Iowa Independent. Our chief executive and founder announced two of our sister sites would close and their content would be moved to The American Independent.

ACS lockout continues; plan emerges to repeal sugar protections

crystal_sugar_80
By Virginia Chamlee | 11.15.11

A recently introduced bill could have far-reaching impact on the U.S. sugar industry, including American Crystal Sugar, a farmer-owned cooperative that locked out 1,300 Midwest workers on Aug. 1.

Cain campaign: Farmers know more about regulations than EPA

hermancain_80x80
By Andrew Duffelmeyer | 11.15.11

The chairman for Herman Cain’s Iowa effort says the campaign “relied more on the word of farmers than Washington regulators” in deciding to run an ad containing claims the Environmental Protection Agency says are false.

Mathis wins, Democrats maintain Senate control

Liz Mathis
By Lynda Waddington | 11.08.11

The Iowa Senate will remain under the control of a slim 26-25 Democratic majority when it reconvenes in January 2012.

Press Release

PR: Nation should work to address veterans’ challenges

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

BRUCE BRALEY RELEASE — As US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan ends, it’s more important than ever that our nation works to address the challenges faced by the men and women who fought there.

PR: Honoring veterans, help in hiring

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

CHUCK GRASSLEY RELEASE — A difficult job market is challenging the soldiers, sailors and airmen who have protected America’s interests by serving in the Armed Forces.

PR: In honor of America’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

TOM LATHAM RELEASE — No one has done more to secure the freedom enjoyed by every single American than our veterans and those currently serving in the armed services.

PR: Honoring and supporting our nation’s veterans

By Press Release Reprints | 11.11.11

DAVE LOEBSACK RELEASE — Veterans Day is an opportunity to reflect on the service of generations of veterans and to honor the sacrifices they and their families have made so that we may live in peace and freedom here at home.

Standing With Carroll’s Old German Paper On Modern-Day Immigration

By Douglas Burns | 10.30.07 | 1:00 pm

[Commentary] When Mexican president Vicente Fox portrayed Mexican-Americans as the latest in a long line of immigrants to western Iowa during an appearance in Storm Lake, his remarks served as a reminder that passions about immigrants ran just as high a century ago as the they do today.

In 1874, German immigrants in Carroll County launched The Demokrat,a  German-language newspaper, with the declaration that the publication would battle to preserve the interests of recently arrived immigrants against “nativisim and fanaticism.”

In her magisterial book on the administration of President Lincoln,”Team of Rivals,” historian Doris Kearns Goodwin points out that vicious attitudes toward German immigrants were very much alive and well in the politics of the 19th century.

In fact, a man widely regarded as far more qualified for the presidency in his time than
Lincoln, William Seward, lost the nomination to Lincoln in no small part because he dared defend German immigrants.

Instead of seeing a version of their own family history in western Iowa’s Latino immigrants, too many in our part of the state buy into the same ugliness their forefathers endured from Protestants with roots in other parts of Europe.

When so many people in this area make heartbreakingly ignorant comments (and I’ve heard many) about Latino immigrants they may as
well be time-machining back to days of the Der Demokrat and slapping their own great-grandmothers.

This clearly isn’t the case with everyone.

Some people get the connection – and have for years.

“Most of us are not that far removed from people who emigrated from other countries,” former Carroll Mayor Tom Gronstal told me in an
interview in 2000. “Iowa’s been settled for only 150 years. None of us go back that far.”

Gronstal was part of then-Gov. Tom Vilsack’s 2010 Council, a bipartisan organization that said the state’s No. 1 goal should be to attract new residents and embrace diversity.

“We arrived at that conclusion by looking at the basic demographics of our state,” Gronstal said at the time. “We’re going to have to become welcoming to all kinds of people.”

Gronstal, whose family’s bank was known as the “German” financial house in the not-too-distant past, said then that Iowa hasn’t made immigration a priority.

Well, it is today.

But not for the reasons Gronstal and others with foresight desired.

For years, western Iowa’s agricultural economy has benefited from the back-breaking labor of Latinos, many legal workers, many illegal.

With that latter class, Iowa winked and nodded and let them into Denison and Storm Lake and Sioux City.

They contributed. They built lives.

As a matter of basic human decency, not to mention economic reality, we owe these immigrants a path to lawful residency and citizenship.

For years, western Iowa has known the score with what amounts to a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy with regard to immigration.

Political leaders and the God-fearing, church-going everyman sat largely silent in Iowa as books like “Fast Food Nation” exposed the
horrors Hispanics faced on the kill floors of Midwestern meatpacking houses. One national magazine even carried a cover story on race in
Storm Lake.

At the time, there was no battle cry for a massive overhaul of immigration.

Western Iowa wanted an invisible underclass, one not heard or seen.

And for years this bargain worked.

Now, because caught between two cultures, some of Iowa’s Latinos fly two separate flags many want them branded as confederates, trucked away as felons, dismissed as would-be terrorists.

Conservative Republicans are nothing if not good poll-readers.

They see the president’s approval rating dipping to numbers that would send most Iowa gardeners outside to cover the flowers. They’re losing
the debate on character and competence and the war and economy.

They need new enemies, new images for television ads in the 2008 elections.

And they found at least some in Marshalltown.

Comments

  • adabell

    German versus modern day immigration I was unaware that German immigrants similarly chose to preserve their German culture rather then assimilating to the American culture.  If this is true, you have educated me, since I find very little similarity to immigration in our history to that of the Latino immigration today. 
    In fact, I thought the immigrants came in accordance to our laws of the time, were detained on entry for health reasons, and had no social services or welfare offered to them.  I thought they adapted to English and would never have guessed that they waved German flags, and displayed German flags at their places of business.  The second president of the United States, John Adams was quoted as saying, “Give up your language and culture and join us.”  I thought that is what immigrants did in the past.
    Amnesty has been tried twice, each time was supposed to be a one time event.  The result was more illegal immigration.  People all over the world are on waiting lists to immigrate into this country.  John F Kennedy introduced an immigration plan that was intended to be fair to all cultures and countries and people waiting to immigrate.  No more then 10% of the total immigration from any one country.  Eight percent of our immigrants was to come from Mexico because they accounted for 8% of the worlds population.  To immigrate to this country unlawfully is unfair to all those around the world who are on waiting lists to immigrate legally.  It is that simple.  Amnesty encourages disregard for our immigration laws.

  • DWunschel

    a little misleading You are right; many of the European immigrants to the US at that time did enter in accordance with laws, or at least through a processing. They had no choice, when you got off the ship at Ellis Island. There was a screening and even a quarantine period for public health reasons. Remember this was the era before antibiotics and even before modern “germ theory” was accepted about the cause of infectious disease. So that was the standard practice. Comparing illegal immigrants of today with the immigrants of that era misses the point. The article is correct; there was a backlash against each wave of immigrants, largely xenophobic in nature. My own family did speak German almost exclusively and remained in close knit farming communities. That wasn’t so different from similar waves of Irish, Italian and Chinese immigrants as well. The term “China Town” is part of our lexicon today for that reason. For our family, it was my Grandparent’s generation that decided their children would be taught only English after their experience during WWI. However any backlash against new waves of immigrants of the nineteenth century was not about whether they entered the country legally or not – immigrants had little choice but to get processed when they arrived. That was well understood.  Clearly, animosity wasn’t over HOW they arrived, simply that they DID arrive and were different.

    To say that today’s national cry to eliminate illegal immigration is simply another racist and xenophobic reaction only turns a deaf ear to the real focus on the ILLEGAL aspect. Yes there are loud voices that want to eliminate all immigration. Unfortunately there are also too many examples of people who pursue a rhetoric of stopping all immigration, period. Fortunately they are not representative of even most conservatives, let alone most Americans. The vast majority do see that the economy benefits from foreign labor, but the backlash today is overwhelmingly on the legal status of those arriving here. Those who are racist or xenophobic are not the central element of those who are focused on correcting the problems created by Illegal immigration. To simply mesh a racist dislike for anyone foreign with a genuine concern for the social ills that illegal immigration creates (for both the immigrant and the host country) is sadly misleading. A focus only on pursuing a legal status for those here illegally turns a blind eye on history. The problem will recreate itself with new people arrive illegally if the draw of employment of illegal immigrants is not also addressed in parallel. Most of us are old enough not to have to rely on a history book to know that, it’s only been 20 years after the last try at amnesty.

  • adabell

    German versus modern day immigration I was unaware that German immigrants similarly chose to preserve their German culture rather then assimilating to the American culture.  If this is true, you have educated me, since I find very little similarity to immigration in our history to that of the Latino immigration today. 

    In fact, I thought the immigrants came in accordance to our laws of the time, were detained on entry for health reasons, and had no social services or welfare offered to them.  I thought they adapted to English and would never have guessed that they waved German flags, and displayed German flags at their places of business.  The second president of the United States, John Adams was quoted as saying, “Give up your language and culture and join us.”  I thought that is what immigrants did in the past.

    Amnesty has been tried twice, each time was supposed to be a one time event.  The result was more illegal immigration.  People all over the world are on waiting lists to immigrate into this country.  John F Kennedy introduced an immigration plan that was intended to be fair to all cultures and countries and people waiting to immigrate.  No more then 10% of the total immigration from any one country.  Eight percent of our immigrants was to come from Mexico because they accounted for 8% of the worlds population.  To immigrate to this country unlawfully is unfair to all those around the world who are on waiting lists to immigrate legally.  It is that simple.  Amnesty encourages disregard for our immigration laws.

  • DWunschel

    a little misleading You are right; many of the European immigrants to the US at that time did enter in accordance with laws, or at least through a processing. They had no choice, when you got off the ship at Ellis Island. There was a screening and even a quarantine period for public health reasons. Remember this was the era before antibiotics and even before modern “germ theory” was accepted about the cause of infectious disease. So that was the standard practice. Comparing illegal immigrants of today with the immigrants of that era misses the point. The article is correct; there was a backlash against each wave of immigrants, largely xenophobic in nature. My own family did speak German almost exclusively and remained in close knit farming communities. That wasn't so different from similar waves of Irish, Italian and Chinese immigrants as well. The term “China Town” is part of our lexicon today for that reason. For our family, it was my Grandparent's generation that decided their children would be taught only English after their experience during WWI. However any backlash against new waves of immigrants of the nineteenth century was not about whether they entered the country legally or not – immigrants had little choice but to get processed when they arrived. That was well understood.  Clearly, animosity wasn't over HOW they arrived, simply that they DID arrive and were different.

    To say that today's national cry to eliminate illegal immigration is simply another racist and xenophobic reaction only turns a deaf ear to the real focus on the ILLEGAL aspect. Yes there are loud voices that want to eliminate all immigration. Unfortunately there are also too many examples of people who pursue a rhetoric of stopping all immigration, period. Fortunately they are not representative of even most conservatives, let alone most Americans. The vast majority do see that the economy benefits from foreign labor, but the backlash today is overwhelmingly on the legal status of those arriving here. Those who are racist or xenophobic are not the central element of those who are focused on correcting the problems created by Illegal immigration. To simply mesh a racist dislike for anyone foreign with a genuine concern for the social ills that illegal immigration creates (for both the immigrant and the host country) is sadly misleading. A focus only on pursuing a legal status for those here illegally turns a blind eye on history. The problem will recreate itself with new people arrive illegally if the draw of employment of illegal immigrants is not also addressed in parallel. Most of us are old enough not to have to rely on a history book to know that, it's only been 20 years after the last try at amnesty.

Categories & Tags: | | | |

Switch to our mobile site